Literature DB >> 22019544

Impulsivity in the supermarket. Responses to calorie taxes and subsidies in healthy weight undergraduates.

Janneke C A H Giesen1, Remco C Havermans, Chantal Nederkoorn, Anita Jansen.   

Abstract

The present study investigated the effect of taxing high-energy dense products and subsidizing low-energy dense products on changes in calorie consumption. More specifically, we hypothesized that 'more impulsive' individuals were less influenced by such pricing strategies compared to 'less impulsive' individuals. Contrary to our hypothesis, results showed that 'more impulsive' individuals adjusted their calorie consumption with regard to price changes whereas 'less impulsive' participants were less influenced by price changes. Furthermore, taxing high-energy dense products was more successful in reducing calorie consumption than subsidizing low-energy dense products.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22019544     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2011.09.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  11 in total

Review 1.  Experimental research on the relation between food price changes and food-purchasing patterns: a targeted review.

Authors:  Leonard H Epstein; Noelle Jankowiak; Chantal Nederkoorn; Hollie A Raynor; Simone A French; Eric Finkelstein
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 2.  Effectiveness of subsidies in promoting healthy food purchases and consumption: a review of field experiments.

Authors:  Ruopeng An
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 4.022

3.  Effects of nutrient profiling and price changes based on NuVal® scores on food purchasing in an online experimental supermarket.

Authors:  Leonard H Epstein; Eric A Finkelstein; David L Katz; Noelle Jankowiak; Corrin Pudlewski; Rocco A Paluch
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 4.022

4.  The Relative Costs of High- vs. Low-Energy-Density Foods and More vs. Less Healthful Beverages Consumed by Children.

Authors:  Kristin A Evans; Patricia A Stewart; Steven R Cook; Christopher L Seplaki; David Q Rich; Isabel Diana Fernandez
Journal:  J Hunger Environ Nutr       Date:  2018-01-02

5.  The effects of a 25% discount on fruits and vegetables: results of a randomized trial in a three-dimensional web-based supermarket.

Authors:  Wilma E Waterlander; Ingrid H M Steenhuis; Michiel R de Boer; Albertine J Schuit; Jacob C Seidell
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 6.457

6.  Offering within-category food swaps to reduce energy density of food purchases: a study using an experimental online supermarket.

Authors:  Suzanna E Forwood; Amy L Ahern; Theresa M Marteau; Susan A Jebb
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 6.457

7.  A process evaluation of the Supermarket Healthy Eating for Life (SHELf) randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Dana Lee Olstad; Kylie Ball; Gavin Abbott; Sarah A McNaughton; Ha N D Le; Cliona Ni Mhurchu; Christina Pollard; David A Crawford
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 6.457

8.  Consumer Acceptance of Population-Level Intervention Strategies for Healthy Food Choices: The Role of Perceived Effectiveness and Perceived Fairness.

Authors:  Colin Bos; Ivo Van Der Lans; Frank Van Rijnsoever; Hans Van Trijp
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 9.  Differential Responses to Food Price Changes by Personal Characteristic: A Systematic Review of Experimental Studies.

Authors:  Anja Mizdrak; Peter Scarborough; Wilma E Waterlander; Mike Rayner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Understanding consumer acceptance of intervention strategies for healthy food choices: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Colin Bos; Ivo A Van der Lans; Frank J Van Rijnsoever; Hans C M Van Trijp
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.