Kristin A Evans1, Patricia A Stewart2, Steven R Cook3, Christopher L Seplaki4, David Q Rich5, Isabel Diana Fernandez6. 1. IBM, Health Care and Life Sciences, kaevans@us.ibm.com. 2. Clinical Research Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY 14642, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Patricia_Stewart@URMC.Rochester.edu. 3. Department of Pediatrics, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY 14642, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Stephen_Cook@URMC.Rochester.edu. 4. Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Epidemiology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, 265 Crittenden Blvd., CU 420644, Rochester, NY, USA 14642-0644, 585-275-9554, Christopher_Seplaki@urmc.rochester.edu. 5. Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Epidemiology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, 265 Crittenden Blvd., CU 420644, Rochester, NY, USA 14642-0644, 585-275-9554, David_Rich@urmc.rochester.edu. 6. Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Epidemiology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, 265 Crittenden Blvd., CU 420644, Rochester, NY, USA 14642-0644, 585-275-9554, Diana_Fernandez@urmc.rochester.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare grocery costs between relatively high energy density foods and sugar-sweetened/high-fat beverages and lower energy density foods and more healthful beverages in children's diets. METHODS: Sixty foods were divided into high and low energy density baskets. Fourteen beverages were designated to either basket based on fat and added-sugar content. Prices were collected at 60 grocery stores and composite costs compared between baskets using Wilcoxon tests. RESULTS: The cost per kilogram of high energy density foods was greater, but the cost per quart of sugar-sweetened/high-fat beverages was lower than more healthful beverages. The cost per 1000 calories and the cost per serving of the high energy density basket were lower. CONCLUSIONS: The relative cost of high and low energy density foods in children's diets depends on how cost is quantified. "Pound-for-pound," lower energy density foods and more healthful beverages are generally less expensive, but high energy density foods and less healthful beverages are cheaper per serving. Cost metrics including other factors (e.g. time cost) may further clarify the role of grocery prices in children's diets.
OBJECTIVE: To compare grocery costs between relatively high energy density foods and sugar-sweetened/high-fat beverages and lower energy density foods and more healthful beverages in children's diets. METHODS: Sixty foods were divided into high and low energy density baskets. Fourteen beverages were designated to either basket based on fat and added-sugar content. Prices were collected at 60 grocery stores and composite costs compared between baskets using Wilcoxon tests. RESULTS: The cost per kilogram of high energy density foods was greater, but the cost per quart of sugar-sweetened/high-fat beverages was lower than more healthful beverages. The cost per 1000 calories and the cost per serving of the high energy density basket were lower. CONCLUSIONS: The relative cost of high and low energy density foods in children's diets depends on how cost is quantified. "Pound-for-pound," lower energy density foods and more healthful beverages are generally less expensive, but high energy density foods and less healthful beverages are cheaper per serving. Cost metrics including other factors (e.g. time cost) may further clarify the role of grocery prices in children's diets.
Entities:
Keywords:
beverages; children; energy density; food prices; grocery stores
Authors: S A French; R W Jeffery; M Story; K K Breitlow; J S Baxter; P Hannan; M P Snyder Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Leonard H Epstein; Elizabeth A Handley; Kelly K Dearing; David D Cho; James N Roemmich; Rocco A Paluch; Samina Raja; Youngju Pak; Bonnie Spring Journal: Psychol Sci Date: 2006-01
Authors: Marilyn S Townsend; Grant J Aaron; Pablo Monsivais; Nancy L Keim; Adam Drewnowski Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2009-02-18 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Leonard H Epstein; Kelly K Dearing; Elizabeth A Handley; James N Roemmich; Rocco A Paluch Journal: Appetite Date: 2006-05-06 Impact factor: 3.868