Literature DB >> 22019336

Nucleosomes and the accessibility problem.

Xin Wang1, Lu Bai, Gene O Bryant, Mark Ptashne.   

Abstract

Eukaryotic DNA is packaged in nucleosomes. How does this sequestration affect the ability of transcription regulators to access their sites? We cite evidence against the idea that nucleosome positioning is determined primarily by the intrinsic propensities of DNA sequences to form nucleosomes--such that, for example, regulatory sites would be 'nucleosome-free'. Instead, studies in yeast show that nucleosome positioning is primarily determined by specific DNA-binding proteins. Where nucleosomes would otherwise compete with regulatory protein binding (a modest but potentially biologically important effect), this obstacle can be relieved by at least two strategies for exposing regulatory sites. In contrast to their lack of effect on nucleosome positioning, DNA sequence differences do directly affect both the efficiencies with which nucleosomes form in regions flanking regulatory sites before induction, and the extent of their removal upon induction. These nucleosomes, evidently, inhibit basal transcription but are poised to be removed quickly upon command. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22019336     DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2011.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Genet        ISSN: 0168-9525            Impact factor:   11.639


  20 in total

Review 1.  The chemistry of regulation of genes and other things.

Authors:  Mark Ptashne
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Altered promoter nucleosome positioning is an early event in gene silencing.

Authors:  Luke B Hesson; Mathew A Sloane; Jason Wh Wong; Andrea C Nunez; Sameer Srivastava; Benedict Ng; Nicholas J Hawkins; Michael J Bourke; Robyn L Ward
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.528

Review 3.  Nucleosome positioning: bringing order to the eukaryotic genome.

Authors:  Vishwanath R Iyer
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 20.808

Review 4.  Disentangling the many layers of eukaryotic transcriptional regulation.

Authors:  Katherine M Lelli; Matthew Slattery; Richard S Mann
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 16.830

5.  Polycomb Responds to Low Levels of Transcription.

Authors:  Georgina Berrozpe; Gene O Bryant; Katherine Warpinski; Dan Spagna; Santosh Narayan; Shivangi Shah; Mark Ptashne
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 9.423

6.  Distinct functions of three chromatin remodelers in activator binding and preinitiation complex assembly.

Authors:  Yashpal Rawal; Hongfang Qiu; Alan G Hinnebusch
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 6.020

7.  Concentration dependent chromatin states induced by the bicoid morphogen gradient.

Authors:  Colleen E Hannon; Shelby A Blythe; Eric F Wieschaus
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Nucleosome free regions in yeast promoters result from competitive binding of transcription factors that interact with chromatin modifiers.

Authors:  Evgeniy A Ozonov; Erik van Nimwegen
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Uncoupling histone turnover from transcription-associated histone H3 modifications.

Authors:  Paolo Ferrari; Michel Strubin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 10.  The emerging roles of ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling enzymes in nucleotide excision repair.

Authors:  Wioletta Czaja; Peng Mao; Michael J Smerdon
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 6.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.