Literature DB >> 22018839

Evaluation of the Kinect™ sensor for 3-D kinematic measurement in the workplace.

Tilak Dutta1.   

Abstract

Recording posture and movement is important for determining risk of musculoskeletal injury in the workplace, but existing motion capture systems are not suited for field work. Estimates of the 3-D relative positions of four 0.10 m cubes from the Kinect were compared to estimates from a Vicon motion capture system to determine whether the hardware sensing components were sensitive enough to be used as a portable 3-D motion capture system for workplace ergonomic assessments. The root-mean-squared errors (SD) were 0.0065 m (0.0048 m), 0.0109 m (0.0059 m), 0.0057 m (0.0042 m) in the x, y and z directions (with x axis to the right, y axis away from the sensor and z axis upwards). These data were collected over a range of 1.0-3.0m from the device covering a field of view of 54.0 degrees horizontally and 39.1 degrees vertically. Requirements for software, hardware and subject preparation were also considered to determine the usability of the Kinect in the field.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd and The Ergonomics Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22018839     DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.09.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  36 in total

Review 1.  A Commentary on Real-Time Biofeedback to Augment Neuromuscular Training for ACL Injury Prevention in Adolescent Athletes.

Authors:  Adam W Kiefer; Adam M Kushner; John Groene; Christopher Williams; Michael A Riley; Gregory D Myer
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Instability of delay classification and determination of early intervention eligibility in the first two years of life.

Authors:  M A Lobo; D A Paul; A Mackley; J Maher; J C Galloway
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2013-10-28

3.  Evaluation of spinal posture using Microsoft Kinect™: A preliminary case-study with 98 volunteers.

Authors:  A P G Castro; J D Pacheco; C Lourenço; S Queirós; A H J Moreira; N F Rodrigues; J L Vilaça
Journal:  Porto Biomed J       Date:  2016-12-27

4.  Modifying Kinect placement to improve upper limb joint angle measurement accuracy.

Authors:  Na Jin Seo; Mojtaba F Fathi; Pilwon Hur; Vincent Crocher
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 1.950

5.  Evaluation of upper extremity movement characteristics during standardized pediatric functional assessment with a Kinect®-based markerless motion analysis system.

Authors:  Jacob R Rammer; Joseph J Krzak; Susan A Riedel; Gerald F Harris
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2014

6.  Can low-cost motion-tracking systems substitute a Polhemus system when researching social motor coordination in children?

Authors:  Veronica Romero; Joseph Amaral; Paula Fitzpatrick; R C Schmidt; Amie W Duncan; Michael J Richardson
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2017-04

7.  Assessment and stability of early learning abilities in preterm and full-term infants across the first two years of life.

Authors:  Michele A Lobo; James C Galloway
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2013-03-15

8.  Concussion History and Neuromechanical Responsiveness Asymmetry.

Authors:  Gary B Wilkerson; Dustin C Nabhan; Ryan T Crane
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Design and Real-World Evaluation of Eyes-Free Yoga: An Exergame for Blind and Low-Vision Exercise.

Authors:  Kyle Rector; Roger Vilardaga; Leo Lansky; Kellie Lu; Cynthia L Bennett; Richard E Ladner; Julie A Kientz
Journal:  ACM Trans Access Comput       Date:  2017-04

Review 10.  A review of computational approaches for evaluation of rehabilitation exercises.

Authors:  Yalin Liao; Aleksandar Vakanski; Min Xian; David Paul; Russell Baker
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 4.589

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.