OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to noninvasively image the electrophysiological (EP) substrate of human ventricles after myocardial infarction and define its characteristics. BACKGROUND: Ventricular infarct border zone is characterized by abnormal cellular electrophysiology and altered structural architecture and is a key contributor to arrhythmogenesis. The ability to noninvasively image its electrical characteristics could contribute to understanding of mechanisms and to risk-stratification for ventricular arrhythmia. METHODS: Electrocardiographic imaging, a noninvasive functional EP imaging modality, was performed during sinus rhythm (SR) in 24 subjects with infarct-related myocardial scar. The abnormal EP substrate on the epicardial aspect of the scar was identified, and its location, size, and morphology were compared with the anatomic scar imaged by other noninvasive modalities. RESULTS: Electrocardiographic imaging constructs epicardial electrograms that have characteristics of reduced amplitude (low voltage) and fractionation. Electrocardiographic imaging colocalizes the epicardial electrical scar to the anatomic scar with a high degree of accuracy (sensitivity 89%, specificity 85%). In nearly all subjects, SR activation patterns were affected by the presence of myocardial scar. Late potentials could be identified and were almost always within ventricular scar. CONCLUSIONS: Electrocardiographic imaging accurately identifies areas of anatomic scar and complements standard anatomic imaging by providing scar-related EP characteristics of low voltages, altered SR activation, electrogram fragmentation, and presence of late potentials.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to noninvasively image the electrophysiological (EP) substrate of human ventricles after myocardial infarction and define its characteristics. BACKGROUND:Ventricular infarct border zone is characterized by abnormal cellular electrophysiology and altered structural architecture and is a key contributor to arrhythmogenesis. The ability to noninvasively image its electrical characteristics could contribute to understanding of mechanisms and to risk-stratification for ventricular arrhythmia. METHODS: Electrocardiographic imaging, a noninvasive functional EP imaging modality, was performed during sinus rhythm (SR) in 24 subjects with infarct-related myocardial scar. The abnormal EP substrate on the epicardial aspect of the scar was identified, and its location, size, and morphology were compared with the anatomic scar imaged by other noninvasive modalities. RESULTS: Electrocardiographic imaging constructs epicardial electrograms that have characteristics of reduced amplitude (low voltage) and fractionation. Electrocardiographic imaging colocalizes the epicardial electrical scar to the anatomic scar with a high degree of accuracy (sensitivity 89%, specificity 85%). In nearly all subjects, SR activation patterns were affected by the presence of myocardial scar. Late potentials could be identified and were almost always within ventricular scar. CONCLUSIONS: Electrocardiographic imaging accurately identifies areas of anatomic scar and complements standard anatomic imaging by providing scar-related EP characteristics of low voltages, altered SR activation, electrogram fragmentation, and presence of late potentials.
Authors: Heiko Mahrholdt; Anja Wagner; Thomas A Holly; Michael D Elliott; Robert O Bonow; Raymond J Kim; Robert M Judd Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-10-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Mathew D Hutchinson; Edward P Gerstenfeld; Benoit Desjardins; Rupa Bala; Michael P Riley; Fermin C Garcia; Sanjay Dixit; David Lin; Wendy S Tzou; Joshua M Cooper; Ralph J Verdino; David J Callans; Francis E Marchlinski Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2010-12-03
Authors: M B Simson; W J Untereker; S R Spielman; L N Horowitz; N H Marcus; R A Falcone; A H Harken; M E Josephson Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1983-01-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Saenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Christopher M Andrews; Neil T Srinivasan; Stefania Rosmini; Heerajnarain Bulluck; Michele Orini; Sharon Jenkins; Antonis Pantazis; William J McKenna; James C Moon; Pier D Lambiase; Yoram Rudy Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2017-07
Authors: Junjie Zhang; Mélèze Hocini; Maria Strom; Phillip S Cuculich; Daniel H Cooper; Frédéric Sacher; Michel Haïssaguerre; Yoram Rudy Journal: JACC Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2017-08
Authors: Clifford G Robinson; Pamela P Samson; Kaitlin M S Moore; Geoffrey D Hugo; Nels Knutson; Sasa Mutic; S Murty Goddu; Adam Lang; Daniel H Cooper; Mitchell Faddis; Amit Noheria; Timothy W Smith; Pamela K Woodard; Robert J Gropler; Dennis E Hallahan; Yoram Rudy; Phillip S Cuculich Journal: Circulation Date: 2019-01-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Phillip S Cuculich; Matthew R Schill; Rojano Kashani; Sasa Mutic; Adam Lang; Daniel Cooper; Mitchell Faddis; Marye Gleva; Amit Noheria; Timothy W Smith; Dennis Hallahan; Yoram Rudy; Clifford G Robinson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-12-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Junjie Zhang; Daniel H Cooper; Kavit A Desouza; Phillip S Cuculich; Pamela K Woodard; Timothy W Smith; Yoram Rudy Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2016-06-06 Impact factor: 1.976