| Literature DB >> 22016638 |
Ehsan Oskoueian1, Norhani Abdullah, Syahida Ahmad, Wan Zuhainis Saad, Abdul Rahman Omar, Yin Wan Ho.
Abstract
Defatted Jatropha curcas L. (J. curcas) seed kernels contained a high percentage of crude protein (61.8%) and relatively little acid detergent fiber (4.8%) and neutral detergent fiber (9.7%). Spectrophotometric analysis of the methanolic extract showed the presence of phenolics, flavonoids and saponins with values of 3.9, 0.4 and 19.0 mg/g DM, respectively. High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analyses showed the presence of gallic acid and pyrogallol (phenolics), rutin and myricetin (flavonoids) and daidzein (isoflavonoid). The amount of phorbol esters in the methanolic extract estimated by HPLC was 3.0 ± 0.1 mg/g DM. Other metabolites detected by GC-MS include: 2-(hydroxymethyl)-2 nitro-1,3-propanediol, β-sitosterol, 2-furancarboxaldehyde, 5-(hydroxymethy) and acetic acid in the methanolic extract; 2-furancarboxaldehyde, 5-(hydroxymethy), acetic acid and furfural (2-furancarboxaldehyde) in the hot water extract. Methanolic and hot water extracts of kernel meal showed antimicrobial activity against both Gram positive and Gram negative pathogenic bacteria (inhibition range: 0-1.63 cm) at the concentrations of 1 and 1.5 mg/disc. Methanolic extract exhibited antioxidant activities that are higher than hot water extract and comparable to β-carotene. The extracts tended to scavenge the free radicals in the reduction of ferric ion (Fe(3+)) to ferrous ion (Fe(2+)). Cytotoxicity assay results indicated the potential of methanolic extract as a source of anticancer therapeutic agents toward breast cancer cells.Entities:
Keywords: Jatropha curcas L.; antibacterial; antioxidant; bioactive compounds; cytotoxicity; kernel meal
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22016638 PMCID: PMC3189762 DOI: 10.3390/ijms12095955
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Chemical and phytochemical analyses of J. curcas kernel meal (on dry matter basis) *.
| Chemical Analyses (%)
| Phytochemical Analyses (mg/g DM)
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Matter (DM) | 94.2 ± 0.53 | Total phenolic | 3.9 ± 0.23 |
| Crude Protein | 61.8 ± 0.11 | Total flavonoid | 0.4 ± 0.15 |
| Organic Matter | 91.6 ± 0.04 | Total saponin | 19.0 ± 0.48 |
| Ash | 8.3 ± 0.07 | Total phorbol esters | 3.0 ± 0.16 |
| NDF | 9.7 ± 0.52 | ||
| ADF | 4.8 ± 0.21 | ||
| Gross Energy (MJ/kg) | 17.7 ± 0.19 | ||
Neutral detergent fiber;
Acid detergent fiber;
Tannic acid equivalents;
Rutin equivalents;
Diosgenin equivalents;
Equivalent to phorbol 12-myristate,13 acetate;
Each value represents the mean ± S.E.M of three replicates.
Figure 1HPLC chromatogram of phenolic and isoflavonoid compounds from methanolic extract of J. curcas kernel meal detected at 280 nm.
Figure 2HPLC chromatogram of flavonoid compounds from methanolic extract of J. curcas kernel meal detected at 350 nm.
Concentrations of phenolic, flavonoid and isoflavonoid compounds in J. curcas kernel meal methanolic extract (μg/g) *.
| Sample | Phenolic (μg/g) | Flavonoid (μg/g) | Isoflavonoid (μg/g) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gallic Acid | Pyrogallol | Rutin | Myricetin | Daidzein | |
| 581 ± 0.4 | 631 ± 0.5 | 48 ± 0.5 | 199 ± 0.3 | 298 ± 0.3 | |
All values are on DM basis;
Each value represents the mean ± S.E.M of three replicates.
Major organic compounds detected in the methanolic and hot water extracts of J. Curcas kernel meal.
| Methanolic Extract
| Hot Water Extract
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Compounds | Content (% w/w) | Compounds | Content (% w/w) |
| 2-(Hydroxymethyl)-2 nitro-1,3-propanediol | 23.1 | 2-Furancarboxaldehyde, 5-(hydroxymethy) | 29.7 |
| β-sitosterol | 13.8 | Acetic acid | 16.2 |
| 2-Furancarboxaldehyde, 5-(hydroxymethy) | 8.9 | Furfural (2-furancarboxaldehyde) | 14.6 |
| Acetic acid | 10.7 | ||
Inhibition zones of J. curcas kernel meal extracts against pathogenic bacteria at the concentration of 1.0 and 1.5 mg/disc.
| Microorganism | Zone of Inhibition (cm)
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methanol | Hot Water | Kanamycin | Streptomycin | ||||
| 1.0 mg/disc | 1.5 mg/disc | 1.0 mg/disc | 1.5 mg/disc | 1.0 μg/disc | 1.0 μg/disc | S.E.M | |
| 1.11 b | 1.21 b | 0.21 e | 0.60 d | 1.54 a | 0.96 c | 0.04 | |
| 1.05 c | 1.20 b | 0.40 e | 0.62 d | 1.44 a | 1.04 c | 0.02 | |
| 1.25 c | 1.63 b | 0.75 e | 1.00 d | 1.70 a | 1.03 d | 0.02 | |
| 0.35 d | 0.58 b | 0.45 c | 0.37 c,d | 1.01 a | 0.41 c,d | 0.02 | |
| 0.5 c | 1.20 a | 0.22 e | 0.30 d | 1.35 b | 1.10 b | 0.02 | |
| 1.10 b | 1.40 a | 0.65 d | 0.85 c | 1.23 b | 0.86 c | 0.04 | |
| 1.00 d | 1.25 b | 0.00 f | 0.77 e | 1.49 a | 1.07 c | 0.02 | |
| 1.15 b | 1.37 a | 0.30 e | 0.75 d | 1.33 a | 0.95 c | 0.04 | |
Means with different superscripts within rows are significantly different (P < 0.05); Analyses were done in triplicate;
S.E.M: Standard error of mean.
Figure 3The free radical scavenging activity of J. curcas kernel meal extracts and reference antioxidants.
The IC50 values of J. curcas kernel meal extracts and reference antioxidants.
| Items | IC50 (mg/mL)
| |
|---|---|---|
| DPPH | FRAP | |
| Methanolic extract | 1.6 b | 3.0 b |
| Hot water extract | 5.0 a | >8 a |
| Vitamin C | 0.3 c | 0.3 c |
| BHT | 0.3 c | 0.3 c |
| β-carotene | 1.5 b | 2.6 b |
| 0.09 | 0.07 | |
| 0.05 | 0.05 | |
Values with different subscripts in each column are significantly different (p < 0.05); Analyses were done in triplicate;
S.E.M: Standard error of mean.
Figure 4Ferric reducing activity of J. curcas kernel meal extracts and reference antioxidants.
Figure 5Effect of methanolic extract of J. curcas kernel meal on MCF-7, HeLa and Chang liver cell viabilities. All bars represent the mean ± standard error of three independent experiments. *** P < 0.0001 and ** P < 0.001 indicates significant difference compared to the untreated control group.
Figure 6Effect of Tamoxifen as a positive control on MCF-7, HeLa and Chang liver cell viabilities. All bars represent the mean ± standard error of three independent experiments. *** P < 0.0001 and ** P < 0.001 indicates significant difference compared to the untreated control group.
The CC50 values of extracts and positive control (Tamoxifen) against MCF-7, HeLa and Chang liver cell lines.
| Sample | CC50 value (μg/mL)
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
| MCF-7 | HeLa | Chang liver cell | |
| Methanolic extract | 27.5 a | 56.4 a | 63.9 a |
| Tamoxifen | 17.3 b | 8.89 b | 33.6 b |
| 0.35 | 0.42 | 0.64 | |
| 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | |
Analyses were done in triplicate;
S.E.M: Standard error of mean.