Literature DB >> 22016578

Recommendations for Using Online Social Networking Technologies to Reduce Inaccurate Online Health Information.

Sean D Young1.   

Abstract

This short report highlights the increasing use of the Internet and online social networking technologies for health information and health decision making, and the consequences of seeking information from sites with biased or inaccurate health information. As the number of disreputable health information sites continues to grow rapidly, this paper provides practical advice for health providers on how they can help prevent health information consumers from seeking inaccurate information online. Reflecting on the utility of online social networking technologies for reaching large audiences, we recommend that health providers use online social networking technologies to communicate with patients and consumers of health information and direct them to reputable sources with accurate health information. We outline the steps to this approach.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22016578      PMCID: PMC3196338     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Online J Health Allied Sci        ISSN: 0972-5997


  9 in total

Review 1.  Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art.

Authors:  R J Cline; K M Haynes
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2001-12

Review 2.  Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gunther Eysenbach; John Powell; Oliver Kuss; Eun-Ryoung Sa
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002 May 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Vaccine disputes.

Authors:  Rebecca Coombes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-06-22

4.  Practicing medicine in the age of Facebook.

Authors:  Sachin H Jain
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Dismissing the family who refuses vaccines: a study of pediatrician attitudes.

Authors:  Erin A Flanagan-Klygis; Lisa Sharp; Joel E Frader
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2005-10

6.  Dissemination of health information through social networks: twitter and antibiotics.

Authors:  Daniel Scanfeld; Vanessa Scanfeld; Elaine L Larson
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.918

7.  How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews.

Authors:  Gunther Eysenbach; Christian Köhler
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-09

8.  Doctors and the Web. Help your patients surf the Net safely.

Authors:  D A Grandinetti
Journal:  Med Econ       Date:  2000-03-06

Review 9.  An evidence-based approach to interactive health communication: a challenge to medicine in the information age. Science Panel on Interactive Communication and Health.

Authors:  T N Robinson; K Patrick; T R Eng; D Gustafson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-10-14       Impact factor: 56.272

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  Harnessing Online Peer Education (HOPE): integrating C-POL and social media to train peer leaders in HIV prevention.

Authors:  Devan Jaganath; Harkiran K Gill; Adam Carl Cohen; Sean D Young
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2011-12-07

2.  Online Technologies for Health Information and Education: A literature review.

Authors:  Harkiran K Gill; Navkiranjit Gill; Sean D Young
Journal:  J Consum Health Internet       Date:  2013-04-01

3.  Consumer Use of "Dr Google": A Survey on Health Information-Seeking Behaviors and Navigational Needs.

Authors:  Kenneth Lee; Kreshnik Hoti; Jeffery David Hughes; Lynne M Emmerton
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Are Health Videos from Hospitals, Health Organizations, and Active Users Available to Health Consumers? An Analysis of Diabetes Health Video Ranking in YouTube.

Authors:  Carlos Fernandez-Llatas; Vicente Traver; Jose-Enrique Borras-Morell; Antonio Martinez-Millana; Randi Karlsen
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 2.238

5.  A qualitative analysis of orthodontic-related posts on Twitter.

Authors:  M Rachel Henzell; A Margaret Knight; K C Morgaine; J S Antoun; M Farella
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 2.079

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.