Literature DB >> 16203937

Dismissing the family who refuses vaccines: a study of pediatrician attitudes.

Erin A Flanagan-Klygis1, Lisa Sharp, Joel E Frader.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Parent refusal or deliberate delay of their child's vaccinations poses a challenge for pediatricians. Some pediatricians may choose to dismiss these families from their practice.
OBJECTIVES: To describe pediatricians' responses to scenarios of vaccine refusal, identify reasons pediatricians cite for both parent refusal and family dismissal, and illustrate pediatrician attitudes about well-established vs newer recommended vaccines. DESIGN/
METHODS: We conducted a nationwide survey mailed to 1004 randomly selected American Academy of Pediatrics (Elk Grove Village, Ill) members.
RESULTS: Fifty-four percent faced total vaccine refusal during a 12-month period. Pediatricians cited safety concerns as a top reason for parent refusal. Thirty-nine percent said they would dismiss a family for refusing all vaccinations. Twenty-eight percent said they would dismiss a family for refusing select vaccines. Pediatrician dismissers were not significantly different from nondismissers with respect to age, sex, and number of years in practice. Pediatrician dismissers were more likely than nondismissers to view traditional vaccines (diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis; inactivated poliovirus; Haemophilus influenzae type b; measles, mumps, and rubella) as "extremely important," but they were no more likely to view newer vaccines (7-valent pneumococcal conjugate, varicella-zoster virus, hepatitis B) as "extremely important."
CONCLUSIONS: Pediatricians commonly face vaccine refusal that they perceive to be due to parent safety concerns. In response, many pediatricians say they would discontinue care for families refusing some or all vaccines. This willingness to dismiss refusing families is inconsistent with an apparent ambivalence about newer, yet recommended, vaccines. The practice of family dismissal needs further study to examine its actual impact on vaccination rates, access to care, and doctor-patient relations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16203937     DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.159.10.929

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med        ISSN: 1072-4710


  30 in total

1.  The Reemergence of Measles.

Authors:  C L Abad; N Safdar
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.725

2.  Ethics and Childhood Vaccination Policy in the United States.

Authors:  Kristin S Hendrix; Lynne A Sturm; Gregory D Zimet; Eric M Meslin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Preserving relationships with antivaccine parents: five suggestions from social psychology.

Authors:  Jennifer Fortune; Kumanan Wilson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Genetics and the myth of vaccine encephalopathy.

Authors:  Asif Doja
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 5.  Addressing heterogeneous parental concerns about vaccination with a multiple-source model: a parent and educator perspective.

Authors:  E Allison Hagood; Stacy Mintzer Herlihy
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Parental vaccine concerns, information source, and choice of alternative immunization schedules.

Authors:  Marissa Wheeler; Alison M Buttenheim
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  The architecture of provider-parent vaccine discussions at health supervision visits.

Authors:  Douglas J Opel; John Heritage; James A Taylor; Rita Mangione-Smith; Halle Showalter Salas; Victoria Devere; Chuan Zhou; Jeffrey D Robinson
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Recommendations for Using Online Social Networking Technologies to Reduce Inaccurate Online Health Information.

Authors:  Sean D Young
Journal:  Online J Health Allied Sci       Date:  2011-07-30

9.  A web-based tool for designing vaccine formularies for childhood immunization in the United States.

Authors:  Sheldon H Jacobson; Edward C Sewell
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Maximizing the effectiveness of a pediatric vaccine formulary while prohibiting extraimmunization.

Authors:  Shane N Hall; Edward C Sewell; Sheldon H Jacobson
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2008-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.