Literature DB >> 22016480

Mathematics anxiety: separating the math from the anxiety.

Ian M Lyons1, Sian L Beilock.   

Abstract

Anxiety about math is tied to low math grades and standardized test scores, yet not all math-anxious individuals perform equally poorly in math. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to separate neural activity during the anticipation of doing math from activity during math performance itself. For higher (but not lower) math-anxious individuals, increased activity in frontoparietal regions when simply anticipating doing math mitigated math-specific performance deficits. This network included bilateral inferior frontal junction, a region involved in cognitive control and reappraisal of negative emotional responses. Furthermore, the relation between frontoparietal anticipatory activity and highly math-anxious individuals' math deficits was fully mediated (or accounted for) by activity in caudate, nucleus accumbens, and hippocampus during math performance. These subcortical regions are important for coordinating task demands and motivational factors during skill execution. Individual differences in how math-anxious individuals recruit cognitive control resources prior to doing math and motivational resources during math performance predict the extent of their math deficits. This work suggests that educational interventions emphasizing control of negative emotional responses to math stimuli (rather than merely additional math training) will be most effective in revealing a population of mathematically competent individuals, who might otherwise go undiscovered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22016480     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhr289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  47 in total

1.  Working memory training in children: Effectiveness depends on temperament.

Authors:  Barbara Studer-Luethi; Catherine Bauer; Walter J Perrig
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-02

2.  Modeling individual differences in response time and accuracy in numeracy.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Clarissa A Thompson; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-01-29

3.  Who is afraid of math? Two sources of genetic variance for mathematical anxiety.

Authors:  Zhe Wang; Sara Ann Hart; Yulia Kovas; Sarah Lukowski; Brooke Soden; Lee A Thompson; Robert Plomin; Grainne McLoughlin; Christopher W Bartlett; Ian M Lyons; Stephen A Petrill
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 8.982

4.  Numbers in action: individual differences and interactivity in mental arithmetic.

Authors:  Lisa G Guthrie; Frédéric Vallée-Tourangeau
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2018-02-03

5.  Dyadic Neural Similarity During Stress in Mother-Child Dyads.

Authors:  Tae-Ho Lee; Yang Qu; Eva H Telzer
Journal:  J Res Adolesc       Date:  2018-03

6.  Individual differences in the components of children's and adults' information processing for simple symbolic and non-symbolic numeric decisions.

Authors:  Clarissa A Thompson; Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2016-05-28

7.  Remediation of Childhood Math Anxiety and Associated Neural Circuits through Cognitive Tutoring.

Authors:  Kaustubh Supekar; Teresa Iuculano; Lang Chen; Vinod Menon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Cognitive enhancement or cognitive cost: trait-specific outcomes of brain stimulation in the case of mathematics anxiety.

Authors:  Amar Sarkar; Ann Dowker; Roi Cohen Kadosh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Math anxiety: A review of its cognitive consequences, psychophysiological correlates, and brain bases.

Authors:  Macarena Suárez-Pellicioni; María Isabel Núñez-Peña; Àngels Colomé
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Math anxiety and executive function: Neural influences of task switching on arithmetic processing.

Authors:  Rachel G Pizzie; Nikita Raman; David J M Kraemer
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.