Literature DB >> 22016105

Molecular morphometric analysis shows relative intra-tumoural homogeneity for KRAS mutations in colorectal cancer.

Liora Farber1, Edna Efrati, Hela Elkin, Yehudit Peerless, Edmond Sabo, Ofer Ben-Izhak, Dov Hershkovitz.   

Abstract

KRAS mutation status has a significant role determining anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) treatment response in colon carcinoma patients. Malignant transformation is a dynamic process and therefore, it is conceivable that, at a certain point, the tumor cells' mass might be heterogeneous for particular mutations. Therefore, the fraction of tumor cells carrying a particular mutation may be more relevant for treatment than the simple determination of presence or absence of mutation. The purpose of this study is to assess whether or not KRAS mutation status is heterogeneous and, if so, to what extent in colon carcinoma samples. Deoxyribonucleic acid was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples of colon carcinoma and analyzed for the presence of KRAS mutation. The relative fraction of mutated versus wild-type KRAS alleles was evaluated by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Additionally, the relative fraction of cancer cells in the tissue sample was evaluated using computer assisted morphometric analysis. Using this data, we calculated the fraction of mutation containing cells in the samples. Colon carcinoma (169 cases) were analyzed, and a KRAS mutation was found in 75 cases (44%), of which 42 were available for morphometric analysis. In 41 (97.6%) of these cases, the fraction of mutation containing tumor cells was 50% or higher, indicating the absence of significant KRAS mutation status heterogeneity. There was a strong positive correlation (R = 0.66, P < 0.0001) between the fraction of mutated KRAS alleles and the fraction of cancer cells in the samples. The strong positive correlation between the fraction of mutated KRAS alleles and the fraction of cancer cells in the samples indicate homogeneity of KRAS mutation status in colorectal carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22016105     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-011-1158-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  19 in total

1.  KRAS mutation status in primary nonsmall cell lung cancer and matched metastases.

Authors:  Alexis B Cortot; Antoine Italiano; Fanny Burel-Vandenbos; Ghyslaine Martel-Planche; Pierre Hainaut
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Acquired KRAS mutations during progression of colorectal cancer metastases: possible implications for therapy and prognosis.

Authors:  Mohamed Bouchahda; Abdoulaye Karaboué; Raphaël Saffroy; Pasquale Innominato; Lee Gorden; Catherine Guettier; René Adam; Francis Lévi
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 3.  ras oncogenes in human cancer: a review.

Authors:  J L Bos
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1989-09-01       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Targeted KRAS mutation assessment on patient tumor histologic material in real time diagnostics.

Authors:  Vassiliki Kotoula; Elpida Charalambous; Bart Biesmans; Andigoni Malousi; Eleni Vrettou; George Fountzilas; George Karkavelas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  KRAS mutations in primary colorectal cancer tumors and related metastases: a potential role in prediction of lung metastasis.

Authors:  Paloma Cejas; Miriam López-Gómez; Cristina Aguayo; Rosario Madero; Javier de Castro Carpeño; Cristóbal Belda-Iniesta; Jorge Barriuso; Víctor Moreno García; Javier Larrauri; Rocío López; Enrique Casado; Manuel Gonzalez-Barón; Jaime Feliu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Christos S Karapetis; Shirin Khambata-Ford; Derek J Jonker; Chris J O'Callaghan; Dongsheng Tu; Niall C Tebbutt; R John Simes; Haji Chalchal; Jeremy D Shapiro; Sonia Robitaille; Timothy J Price; Lois Shepherd; Heather-Jane Au; Christiane Langer; Malcolm J Moore; John R Zalcberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  The colorectal adenoma-carcinoma sequence.

Authors:  A Leslie; F A Carey; N R Pratt; R J C Steele
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 8.  KRAS mutation testing in human cancers: The pathologist's role in the era of personalized medicine.

Authors:  Hanlin L Wang; Jean Lopategui; Mahul B Amin; Scott D Patterson
Journal:  Adv Anat Pathol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.875

9.  KRAS mutation analysis: a comparison between primary tumours and matched liver metastases in 305 colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  N Knijn; L J M Mekenkamp; M Klomp; M E Vink-Börger; J Tol; S Teerenstra; J W R Meijer; M Tebar; S Riemersma; J H J M van Krieken; C J A Punt; I D Nagtegaal
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 10.  American Society of Clinical Oncology provisional clinical opinion: testing for KRAS gene mutations in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma to predict response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody therapy.

Authors:  Carmen J Allegra; J Milburn Jessup; Mark R Somerfield; Stanley R Hamilton; Elizabeth H Hammond; Daniel F Hayes; Pamela K McAllister; Roscoe F Morton; Richard L Schilsky
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  7 in total

1.  Allele specific locked nucleic acid quantitative PCR (ASLNAqPCR): an accurate and cost-effective assay to diagnose and quantify KRAS and BRAF mutation.

Authors:  Luca Morandi; Dario de Biase; Michela Visani; Valentina Cesari; Giovanna De Maglio; Stefano Pizzolitto; Annalisa Pession; Giovanni Tallini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Tumor heterogeneity: mechanisms and bases for a reliable application of molecular marker design.

Authors:  Salvador J Diaz-Cano
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 6.208

3.  Variation in KRAS driver substitution distributions between tumor types is determined by both mutation and natural selection.

Authors:  Sheli L Ostrow; Einav Simon; Elad Prinz; Tova Bick; Talia Shentzer; Sima S Nagawkar; Edmond Sabo; Ofer Ben-Izhak; Ruth Hershberg; Dov Hershkovitz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Clinically significant sub-clonality for common drivers can be detected in 26% of KRAS/EGFR mutated lung adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Einav Simon; Tova Bick; Shada Sarji; Talia Shentzer; Elad Prinz; Liza Yehiam; Edmond Sabo; Ofer Ben-Izhak; Dov Hershkovitz
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-11

5.  Genetic and Epigenetic Intra-tumour Heterogeneity in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Huw Geraint Jones; Gareth Jenkins; Namor Williams; Paul Griffiths; Phil Chambers; John Beynon; Dean Harris
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Heterogeneity in Colorectal Cancer: A Challenge for Personalized Medicine?

Authors:  Chiara Molinari; Giorgia Marisi; Alessandro Passardi; Laura Matteucci; Giulia De Maio; Paola Ulivi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Targeted therapies in colorectal cancer-an integrative view by PPPM.

Authors:  Suzanne Hagan; Maria C M Orr; Brendan Doyle
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 6.543

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.