Literature DB >> 22013397

Cancer mortality for a single race in low versus high elevation counties in the u.s.

John Hart1.   

Abstract

A previous study compared cancer mortality in the six lowest versus six highest elevations in the U.S. for all races. This study looks at a single race since death rates tend to vary by race. In this ecological study, cancer mortality rates were compared between low and high states for a race that had sufficient number of counties reporting mortality data, that is, the white race. The average cancer mortality rate for low elevation counties was 73.47 + 18.35 compared to 53.90 + 13.76 for high elevation counties, a difference that was statistically significant (p < 0.0001), with a very large effect size (of 1.2). Higher elevation counties showed less cancer mortality rates for a single race compared to lower elevation counties, suggesting the presence of radiation hormesis. Further rigorous research is indicated to verify or refute these findings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Background radiation; Caucasian race; altitude; cancer death rates; medical geography

Year:  2010        PMID: 22013397      PMCID: PMC3186929          DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.10-014.Hart

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dose Response        ISSN: 1559-3258            Impact factor:   2.658


  3 in total

1.  Breast and cervical cancer screening: sociodemographic predictors among White, Black, and Hispanic women.

Authors:  Elizabeth Selvin; Kate M Brett
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Cancer mortality in six lowest versus six highest elevation jurisdictions in the u.s.

Authors:  John Hart
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Cancer mortality in the United States by education level and race.

Authors:  Jessica D Albano; Elizabeth Ward; Ahmedin Jemal; Robert Anderson; Vilma E Cokkinides; Taylor Murray; Jane Henley; Jonathan Liff; Michael J Thun
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 13.506

  3 in total
  7 in total

1.  The cancer mortality in high natural radiation areas in poland.

Authors:  Krzysztof Wojciech Fornalski; Ludwik Dobrzyński
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Hypoxia-Inducible Factors and Cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan C Jun; Aman Rathore; Haris Younas; Daniele Gilkes; Vsevolod Y Polotsky
Journal:  Curr Sleep Med Rep       Date:  2017-01-28

3.  Radiation-hormesis phenotypes, the related mechanisms and implications for disease prevention and therapy.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  J Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 5.782

Review 4.  Health Impacts of Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation: Current Scientific Debates and Regulatory Issues.

Authors:  Alexander Vaiserman; Alexander Koliada; Oksana Zabuga; Yehoshua Socol
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 5.  Influence of Individual Radiosensitivity on the Hormesis Phenomenon: Toward a Mechanistic Explanation Based on the Nucleoshuttling of ATM Protein.

Authors:  Clément Devic; Mélanie L Ferlazzo; Elise Berthel; Nicolas Foray
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Background radiation impacts human longevity and cancer mortality: reconsidering the linear no-threshold paradigm.

Authors:  Elroei David; Marina Wolfson; Vadim E Fraifeld
Journal:  Biogerontology       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 4.277

7.  Heart Disease Death Rates in Low Versus High Land Elevation Counties in the U.S.

Authors:  John Hart
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 2.658

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.