Literature DB >> 22012522

The effect of weekly risedronate on periprosthetic bone resorption following total hip arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Olof Gustaf Sköldenberg1, Mats Olof Salemyr, Henrik Stefan Bodén, Torbjörn Efraim Ahl, Per Yngve Adolphson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bone loss leading to late-occurring periprosthetic femoral fracture is a mode of failure in cementless total hip arthroplasty. The aim of this trial was to investigate the effect of a bisphosphonate, risedronate, on femoral periprosthetic bone resorption following total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip.
METHODS: We enrolled seventy-three patients between the ages of forty and seventy years who were scheduled to undergo total hip arthroplasty in a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive either 35 mg of risedronate (n = 36) or a placebo (n = 37) orally once weekly for six months. The primary end point was the change in bone mineral density in Gruen femoral zones 1 and 7. Bone mineral density scans were made preoperatively and at two days and three, six, twelve, and twenty-four months postoperatively. Secondary end points included migration of the femoral stem and clinical outcome.
RESULTS: Seventy of the seventy-three patients (thirty-three in the risedronate group and thirty-seven in the placebo group) were analyzed for the primary end point. The mean bone mineral density in zone 1 was 9.2% higher (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2% to 14.1%) in the risedronate group than in the placebo group at six months postoperatively and 7.2% higher (95% CI, 1.0% to 13.3%) at one year. The mean bone mineral density in zone 7 was 8.0% higher (95% CI, 2.7% to 13.4%) in the risedronate group than in the placebo group at six months postoperatively and 4.3% higher (95% CI, -1.5% to 10.1%) at one year. Migration of the femoral stem, the clinical outcome, and the frequency of adverse events did not differ between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Risedronate taken once weekly for six months following total hip arthroplasty was effective in reducing periprosthetic bone resorption around an uncemented femoral stem up to one year after surgery but had no discernible effect on implant migration or clinical outcome. Future studies of bisphosphonate treatment following total hip arthroplasty should focus on clinically relevant end points such as the risks of fracture and revision arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22012522     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01646

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  30 in total

1.  Bisphosphonates for the preservation of periprosthetic bone mineral density after total joint arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of 25 randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  M Shi; L Chen; Z Xin; Y Wang; W Wang; S Yan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Porous titanium construct cup compared to porous coated titanium cup in total hip arthroplasty. A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Mats Salemyr; Olle Muren; Thomas Eisler; Henrik Bodén; Ghazi Chammout; André Stark; Olof Sköldenberg
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Anterior and Anterolateral Approaches for THA Are Associated With Lower Dislocation Risk Without Higher Revision Risk.

Authors:  Dhiren Sheth; Guy Cafri; Maria C S Inacio; Elizabeth W Paxton; Robert S Namba
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Are biologic treatments a potential approach to wear- and corrosion-related problems?

Authors:  R Lane Smith; Edward M Schwarz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Association of Bisphosphonate Use and Risk of Revision After THA: Outcomes From a US Total Joint Replacement Registry.

Authors:  Monti Khatod; Maria C S Inacio; Richard M Dell; Stefano A Bini; Elizabeth W Paxton; Robert S Namba
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Pharmacologic augmentation of implant fixation in osteopenic bone.

Authors:  R D Ross; J L Hamilton; B M Wilson; D R Sumner; A S Virdi
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.096

7.  Restoration of proximal periprosthetic bone loss by denosumab in cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Satoshi Nagoya; Kenji Tateda; Shunichiro Okazaki; Ima Kosukegawa; Junya Shimizu; Toshihiko Yamashita
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-05-17

Review 8.  [Periprosthetic fractures following total hip and knee arthroplasty: Risk factors, epidemiological aspects, diagnostics and classification systems].

Authors:  M Fuchs; C Perka; P von Roth
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 9.  Painful prosthesis: approaching the patient with persistent pain following total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Prisco Piscitelli; Giovanni Iolascon; Massimo Innocenti; Roberto Civinini; Alessandro Rubinacci; Maurizio Muratore; Michele D'Arienzo; Paolo Tranquilli Leali; Anna Maria Carossino; Maria Luisa Brandi
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2013-05

Review 10.  [Endoprosthetic treatment of osteoporosis-related coxarthrosis : aspects of safe patient treatment].

Authors:  S Kirschner; A Hartmann; K-P Günther; C Hamann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.