BACKGROUND AND GOALS: Magnetic resonance (MR) enterography provides the advantages of conventional enteroclysis and those of cross-sectional imaging. Adequate luminal distension, combined with ultrafast sequences, results in excellent delineation of mural and extramural manifestations of Crohn's disease. Recent technical advances, including ultra-high-field strength MR with its capability to provide fast multiplanar images with excellent soft tissue contrast, are only rarely included in abdominal studies. STUDY: One hundred four consecutive patients with a proved or suspected diagnosis of ileitis terminalis were prospectively selected for MR imaging studies and ileocolonoscopy. The final diagnosis was based on histopathological findings or based on a combined endpoint of clinical, laboratory, endoscopic, and imaging findings. RESULTS: According to the endoscopic examination, stenosis was present in 26 patients (25%) and could be ruled out in 78 patients (75%). Total agreement between MR and endoscopy could be reached in 74 patients (71%). Histology indicated absence of inflammation in 50 patients (48%). MR and endoscopic findings were concordant in 38 patients (76%) and 37 patients (74%), respectively. Corresponding results by ileocolonoscopy were 37 true negative, 29 true positive, 4 false positive, and 12 false negative (sensitivity, 70.7%; specificity, 74%). CONCLUSIONS: MR enterography with a 3.0-T scanner is a powerful tool in the evaluation of ileal diseases, and has therefore made MR enterography the first-line modality at our institution in patients with suspected inflammatory bowel disease.
BACKGROUND AND GOALS: Magnetic resonance (MR) enterography provides the advantages of conventional enteroclysis and those of cross-sectional imaging. Adequate luminal distension, combined with ultrafast sequences, results in excellent delineation of mural and extramural manifestations of Crohn's disease. Recent technical advances, including ultra-high-field strength MR with its capability to provide fast multiplanar images with excellent soft tissue contrast, are only rarely included in abdominal studies. STUDY: One hundred four consecutive patients with a proved or suspected diagnosis of ileitis terminalis were prospectively selected for MR imaging studies and ileocolonoscopy. The final diagnosis was based on histopathological findings or based on a combined endpoint of clinical, laboratory, endoscopic, and imaging findings. RESULTS: According to the endoscopic examination, stenosis was present in 26 patients (25%) and could be ruled out in 78 patients (75%). Total agreement between MR and endoscopy could be reached in 74 patients (71%). Histology indicated absence of inflammation in 50 patients (48%). MR and endoscopic findings were concordant in 38 patients (76%) and 37 patients (74%), respectively. Corresponding results by ileocolonoscopy were 37 true negative, 29 true positive, 4 false positive, and 12 false negative (sensitivity, 70.7%; specificity, 74%). CONCLUSIONS: MR enterography with a 3.0-T scanner is a powerful tool in the evaluation of ileal diseases, and has therefore made MR enterography the first-line modality at our institution in patients with suspected inflammatory bowel disease.
Authors: Ricardo de Alvares Goulart; Sandra Maria Barbalho; Rodrigo Galhardi Gasparini; Antonely de Cassio Alves de Carvalho Journal: Gastroenterology Res Date: 2016-03-08
Authors: D A Pendsé; J C Makanyanga; A A Plumb; G Bhatnagar; D Atkinson; Manuel Rodriguez-Justo; S Halligan; S A Taylor Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2017-01