Xuyuan Jiang1, Patrick Asbach, Bernd Hamm, Ke Xu, Jan Banzer. 1. Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, No. 155 Nanjing North Street, Heping District, 110001, Shenyang, China.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of MR enterography (MRE) for detection of distal ileal and colorectal inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and to evaluate whether 3 T MRI can provide a higher diagnostic performance compared to 1.5 T. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with known or suspected IBD who underwent MRE and colonoscopy within 3 months was performed. For analysis, the bowel was divided into six segments. Compared with colonoscopy, the accuracy values for MRI diagnosis of overall and each magnetic field strength were calculated, and the differences between 1.5 T and 3.0 T were compared. The image quality was scored separately for both field strengths and compared. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients were included in the study. On a patient basis, MRE had an overall sensitivity of 92.1 % and specificity of 72.0 %. On a segment basis, the sensitivity and specificity were 79.1 % and 93.6 %, respectively. Concerning severely inflamed segments, per-segment sensitivity increased from 79.1 to 94.7 %. The comparison of accuracy values between the two field strengths showed no statistically significant difference. B1 homogeneity and overall artifacts were not significantly different between 3.0 T and 1.5 T imaging. Compared to colonoscopy, MRI found four more fistulas confirmed at subsequent surgery. CONCLUSIONS: MRI has a high diagnostic accuracy for detection of distal ileal and colorectal IBD. 3 T MRI can be considered equivalent but not superior compared to 1.5 T imaging in this context. In addition, our findings suggest MRE to be a valuable tool in detecting surgically relevant pathologies (fistulas) with higher accuracy than colonoscopy.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of MR enterography (MRE) for detection of distal ileal and colorectal inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and to evaluate whether 3 T MRI can provide a higher diagnostic performance compared to 1.5 T. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with known or suspected IBD who underwent MRE and colonoscopy within 3 months was performed. For analysis, the bowel was divided into six segments. Compared with colonoscopy, the accuracy values for MRI diagnosis of overall and each magnetic field strength were calculated, and the differences between 1.5 T and 3.0 T were compared. The image quality was scored separately for both field strengths and compared. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients were included in the study. On a patient basis, MRE had an overall sensitivity of 92.1 % and specificity of 72.0 %. On a segment basis, the sensitivity and specificity were 79.1 % and 93.6 %, respectively. Concerning severely inflamed segments, per-segment sensitivity increased from 79.1 to 94.7 %. The comparison of accuracy values between the two field strengths showed no statistically significant difference. B1 homogeneity and overall artifacts were not significantly different between 3.0 T and 1.5 T imaging. Compared to colonoscopy, MRI found four more fistulas confirmed at subsequent surgery. CONCLUSIONS: MRI has a high diagnostic accuracy for detection of distal ileal and colorectal IBD. 3 T MRI can be considered equivalent but not superior compared to 1.5 T imaging in this context. In addition, our findings suggest MRE to be a valuable tool in detecting surgically relevant pathologies (fistulas) with higher accuracy than colonoscopy.
Authors: A Dignass; G Van Assche; J O Lindsay; M Lémann; J Söderholm; J F Colombel; S Danese; A D'Hoore; M Gassull; F Gomollón; D W Hommes; P Michetti; C O'Morain; T Oresland; A Windsor; E F Stange; S P L Travis Journal: J Crohns Colitis Date: 2010-01-15 Impact factor: 9.071
Authors: Karin van Gemert-Horsthuis; Jasper Florie; Daniel W Hommes; Cristina Lavini; Johannes B Reitsma; Sander J van Deventer; Jaap Stoker Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Jeroen A W Tielbeek; Jesica C Makanyanga; Shandra Bipat; Doug A Pendsé; C Yung Nio; Frans M Vos; Stuart A Taylor; Jaap Stoker Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: S A Taylor; F Avni; C G Cronin; C Hoeffel; S H Kim; A Laghi; M Napolitano; P Petit; J Rimola; D J Tolan; M R Torkzad; M Zappa; G Bhatnagar; C A J Puylaert; J Stoker Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-10-18 Impact factor: 5.315