Literature DB >> 22009710

Navigation-assisted surgery for bone and soft tissue tumors with bony extension.

Makoto Ieguchi1, Manabu Hoshi, Jun Takada, Noriaki Hidaka, Hiroaki Nakamura.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The navigation system was introduced to orthopaedic surgery in the 1990s. More recently, CT-based navigation systems have been used more commonly in spine and joint replacement surgery because of their precision. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The aim of our study was to evaluate the accuracy and efficacy of navigation-assisted excision of bone and soft tissue tumors.
METHODS: From 2006 to 2009, we performed navigation-assisted surgery in 16 patients, 11 males and five females, with a mean age of 39 years (range, 13-70 years). We diagnosed nine benign bone tumors and seven malignant bone and soft tissue tumors. In two patients, the malignant soft tissue tumors infiltrated the adjacent bones. Nine excisional biopsies for benign tumors and seven en bloc excisions for malignant tumors were performed. In all cases, the point registration method was performed using 10 skin markers, which were placed around the tumor. Each excisional difference between the preoperative and postoperative plans was evaluated histologically or by postoperative CT.
RESULTS: The mean accuracy of this system, which was determined using skin markers, was 0.93 mm (range, 0.6-1.2 mm). All biopsy and excision samples were evaluated by pathologic examination and postoperative CT imaging. The mean difference between the planned margin and postoperative CT or excised histologic specimen was 0 mm to 4 mm. The mean followup was 34 months (range, 10-54 months). There were no local recurrences, except for excision of skip metastases in a patient with a chordoma.
CONCLUSION: We report our experience with navigation-assisted surgery for bone and soft tissue tumors. Navigation-assisted surgery could be indicated for sufficiently reliable, accurate, and minimally invasive resections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22009710      PMCID: PMC3238002          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-2094-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  34 in total

1.  Image-guided transnasal endoscopic surgery of the paranasal sinuses and anterior skull base.

Authors:  A M Neumann; K Pasquale-Niebles; T Bhuta; M J Sillers
Journal:  Am J Rhinol       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec

2.  [CT and fluoroscopy based navigation in pelvic surgery].

Authors:  U Stöckle; B König; K Schaser; I Melcher; N P Haas
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Caffeine-assisted chemotherapy and minimized tumor excision for nonmetastatic osteosarcoma.

Authors:  H Tsuchiya; K Tomita; Y Mori; N Asada; T Morinaga; S Kitano; N Yamamoto
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.480

4.  Computer assisted knee replacement.

Authors:  S L Delp; S D Stulberg; B Davies; F Picard; F Leitner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Computer-aided pedicle screw placement using frameless stereotaxis.

Authors:  N D Glossop; R W Hu; J A Randle
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  [CAS (computer assisted surgery). A new procedure in head and neck surgery].

Authors:  G Schlöndorff; R Mösges; D Meyer-Ebrecht; W Krybus; L Adams
Journal:  HNO       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  New method of evaluating the surgical margin and safety margin for musculoskeletal sarcoma, analysed on the basis of 457 surgical cases.

Authors:  N Kawaguchi; S Matumoto; J Manabe
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Computer-assisted anterior spinal surgery for a case of recurrent giant cell tumor.

Authors:  Naoki Shoda; Susumu Nakajima; Atsushi Seichi; Akinori Kan; Motoshige Iwasaki; Tomoaki Kitagawa; Hiroshi Kawaguchi; Kozo Nakamura
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.601

9.  Ossifying fibroma of the skull: interactive image-guided minimally invasive localization and resection.

Authors:  Carsten Westendorff; Jürgen Hoffmann; Dirk Troitzsch; Florian Dammann; Siegmar Reinert
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.046

10.  New indications for computer-assisted surgery: tumor resection in the pelvis.

Authors:  Tobias Hüfner; Maurício Kfuri; Michael Galanski; Leonard Bastian; Martin Loss; Tim Pohlemann; Christian Krettek
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  13 in total

1.  Are Skin Fiducials Comparable to Bone Fiducials for Registration When Planning Navigation-assisted Musculoskeletal Tumor Resections in a Cadaveric Simulated Tumor Model?

Authors:  Rodolfo Zamora; Stephanie E Punt; Claudia Christman-Skieller; Cengiz Yildirim; John C Shapton; Ernest U Conrad
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  What Is the Expected Learning Curve in Computer-assisted Navigation for Bone Tumor Resection?

Authors:  Germán L Farfalli; José I Albergo; Lucas E Ritacco; Miguel A Ayerza; Federico E Milano; Luis A Aponte-Tinao
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Assessment of registration accuracy during computer-aided oncologic limb-salvage surgery.

Authors:  Kurt E Stoll; Joan D Miles; Jedediah K White; Stephanie E W Punt; Ernest U Conrad; Randal P Ching
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Patient-specific instrument can achieve same accuracy with less resection time than navigation assistance in periacetabular pelvic tumor surgery: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Kwok-Chuen Wong; Kwan-Yik Sze; Irene Oi-Ling Wong; Chung-Ming Wong; Shekhar-Madhukar Kumta
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Can Navigation-assisted Surgery Help Achieve Negative Margins in Resection of Pelvic and Sacral Tumors?

Authors:  John A Abraham; Barry Kenneally; Kamil Amer; David S Geller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Treatment of Post-traumatic Pediatric Ankle Varus Deformity with Physeal Bar Resection and Hemi-Epiphysiodesis.

Authors:  Gang Fu; Wang Wang; Yi-Fei Dong; Xue-Min Lv; Zheng Yang
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2019-07-25

7.  Does intraoperative navigation assistance improve bone tumor resection and allograft reconstruction results?

Authors:  Luis Aponte-Tinao; Lucas E Ritacco; Miguel A Ayerza; D Luis Muscolo; Jose I Albergo; Germán L Farfalli; Germán L Farfall
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Computer navigation-assisted surgery for musculoskeletal tumors: a closer look into the learning curve.

Authors:  Kevin Staats; Joannis Panotopoulos; Thomas M Tiefenboeck; Reinhard Windhager; Philipp T Funovics
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-06-24

9.  Computer-assisted tumor surgery in malignant bone tumors.

Authors:  Kwok Chuen Wong; Shekhar Madhukar Kumta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Use of Computer Navigation in Orthopedic Oncology.

Authors:  Kwok-Chuen Wong; Shekhar-Madhukar Kumta
Journal:  Curr Surg Rep       Date:  2014-02-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.