OBJECTIVES: Recent data suggest that community viral load (CVL) can be used as a population-level biomarker for HIV transmission and its reduction may be associated with a decrease in HIV incidence. Given the magnitude of the HIV epidemic in Washington, District of Columbia, we sought to measure the District of Columbia's CVL. DESIGN: An ecological analysis was conducted. METHODS: Mean and total CVL were calculated using the most recent viral load for prevalent HIV/AIDS cases reported to District of Columbia HIV/AIDS surveillance through 2008. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted to assess differences in CVL availability, mean CVL, proportion of undetectable viral loads, and 5-year trends in mean CVL and new HIV/AIDS diagnoses. Geospatial analysis was used to map mean CVL and selected indicators of socioeconomic status by geopolitical designation. RESULTS: Among 15,467 HIV/AIDS cases alive from 2004 to 2008, 48.2% had at least one viral load reported. Viral load data completeness increased significantly over the 5 years (P < 0.001). Mean CVL significantly decreased over time (P < 0.0001). At the end of 2008, the mean CVL was 33,847 copies/ml; 57.4% of cases had undetectable viral loads. Overlaps in the geographic distribution of CVL by census tract were observed with the highest means observed in areas with high poverty rates and low high school diploma rates. CONCLUSION: Mean and total CVL provide markers of access to care and treatment, are indicators of the population's viral burden, and are useful in assessing trends in local HIV/AIDS epidemics. Measurement of CVL is a novel tool for assessing the potential impact of population-level HIV prevention and treatment interventions.
OBJECTIVES: Recent data suggest that community viral load (CVL) can be used as a population-level biomarker for HIV transmission and its reduction may be associated with a decrease in HIV incidence. Given the magnitude of the HIV epidemic in Washington, District of Columbia, we sought to measure the District of Columbia's CVL. DESIGN: An ecological analysis was conducted. METHODS: Mean and total CVL were calculated using the most recent viral load for prevalent HIV/AIDS cases reported to District of Columbia HIV/AIDS surveillance through 2008. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted to assess differences in CVL availability, mean CVL, proportion of undetectable viral loads, and 5-year trends in mean CVL and new HIV/AIDS diagnoses. Geospatial analysis was used to map mean CVL and selected indicators of socioeconomic status by geopolitical designation. RESULTS: Among 15,467 HIV/AIDS cases alive from 2004 to 2008, 48.2% had at least one viral load reported. Viral load data completeness increased significantly over the 5 years (P < 0.001). Mean CVL significantly decreased over time (P < 0.0001). At the end of 2008, the mean CVL was 33,847 copies/ml; 57.4% of cases had undetectable viral loads. Overlaps in the geographic distribution of CVL by census tract were observed with the highest means observed in areas with high poverty rates and low high school diploma rates. CONCLUSION: Mean and total CVL provide markers of access to care and treatment, are indicators of the population's viral burden, and are useful in assessing trends in local HIV/AIDS epidemics. Measurement of CVL is a novel tool for assessing the potential impact of population-level HIV prevention and treatment interventions.
Authors: David W Pantalone; Julia C Tomassilli; Tyrel J Starks; Sarit A Golub; Jeffrey T Parsons Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Brian Houle; Sanyu A Mojola; Nicole Angotti; Enid Schatz; F Xavier Gómez-Olivé; Samuel J Clark; Jill R Williams; Chodziwadziwa Kabudula; Stephen Tollman; Jane Menken Journal: AIDS Care Date: 2018-04-27
Authors: Michael G Eberhart; Baligh R Yehia; Amy Hillier; Chelsea D Voytek; Michael B Blank; Ian Frank; David S Metzger; Kathleen A Brady Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2013-11-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Jonathan M Ellen; Bill Kapogiannis; J Dennis Fortenberry; Jiahong Xu; Nancy Willard; Anna Duval; Jill Pace; Jackie Loeb; Dina Monte; James Bethel Journal: AIDS Date: 2014-05-15 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Vladimir Novitsky; Melanie Prague; Sikhulile Moyo; Tendani Gaolathe; Mompati Mmalane; Etienne Kadima Yankinda; Unoda Chakalisa; Refeletswe Lebelonyane; Nealia Khan; Kathleen M Powis; Erik Widenfelt; Simani Gaseitsiwe; Scott L Dryden-Peterson; Molly Pretorius Holme; Victor De Gruttola; Pam Bachanas; Joseph Makhema; Shahin Lockman; M Essex Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2018-01-17 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Vivek Jain; Teri Liegler; Jane Kabami; Gabriel Chamie; Tamara D Clark; Douglas Black; Elvin H Geng; Dalsone Kwarisiima; Joseph K Wong; Mohamed Abdel-Mohsen; Nitin Sonawane; Francesca T Aweeka; Harsha Thirumurthy; Maya L Petersen; Edwin D Charlebois; Moses R Kamya; Diane V Havlir Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2012-12-12 Impact factor: 9.079