Literature DB >> 22008213

Practice guidelines and clinical risk assessment models: is it time to reform?

Nariman Sepehrvand1, Firouz Ghaderi Pakdel, Mohammad Hosein Rahimi-Rad, Babak Moosavi-Toomatari, Shahrzad Bazargan-Hejazi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines and Risk Assessment Models (RAMs) are some useful tools to bring medical evidences into our daily clinical practice. Despite the improvement over the time, they still have some shortcomings. DISCUSSION: One of these shortcomings is the arbitrary cutoffs used in these tools to facilitate the decision making process. This problem is to some extent due to the "Black or White" approach of modern medicine in making the decisions, whilst in the real world and our daily practice we used mostly an uncertain approach, which is called recently as "Fuzzy" thinking approach.
SUMMARY: The authors of this article believe that the fuzzy type of thinking may resolve the above mentioned shortcomings of clinical practice guideline or risk assessment models and they tried to discuss about this using an example about Venous Thromboembolism related guidelines and RAMs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22008213      PMCID: PMC3210091          DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-11-63

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak        ISSN: 1472-6947            Impact factor:   2.796


  21 in total

1.  Fuzzy epidemics.

Authors:  Eduardo Massad; Neli Regina Siqueira Ortega; Cláudio José Struchiner; Marcelo Nascimento Burattini
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.326

Review 2.  Fuzzy logic and causal reasoning with an 'n' of 1 for diagnosis and treatment of the stroke patient.

Authors:  Cathy M Helgason; Thomas H Jobe
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.618

3.  Probabilistic and fuzzy logic in the clinical diagnosis.

Authors:  L Pagliaro
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 4.  Fuzzy set theory in medicine.

Authors:  F Steimann
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.326

5.  Fuzzy logic and continuous cellular automata in warfarin dosing of stroke patients.

Authors:  Cathy M Helgason; Thomas H Jobe
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2005-07

6.  Electronic alerts to prevent venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Nils Kucher; Sophia Koo; Rene Quiroz; Joshua M Cooper; Marilyn D Paterno; Boris Soukonnikov; Samuel Z Goldhaber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-03-10       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  A validation study of a retrospective venous thromboembolism risk scoring method.

Authors:  Vinita Bahl; Hsou Mei Hu; Peter K Henke; Thomas W Wakefield; Darrell A Campbell; Joseph A Caprini
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  The application of fuzzy logic to the prescription of antithrombotic agents in the elderly.

Authors:  Cathy M Helgason
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.923

9.  Thromboembolic risk assessment and the efficacy of enoxaparin prophylaxis in excisional body contouring surgery.

Authors:  Daniel A Hatef; Jeffrey M Kenkel; Marilyn Q Nguyen; Jordan P Farkas; Fatemeh Abtahi; Rod J Rohrich; Spencer A Brown
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 10.  Risk factors for venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Frederick A Anderson; Frederick A Spencer
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-06-17       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  1 in total

1.  External Validation and Refinement of Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade Risk Model in Patients With Heart Failure in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Nariman Sepehrvand; Erik Youngson; Jeffrey A Bakal; Finlay A McAlister; Brian H Rowe; Justin A Ezekowitz
Journal:  CJC Open       Date:  2019-04-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.