BACKGROUND: Fine needle aspiration (FNA), although very reliable for cytologically benign and malignant thyroid nodules, has much lower predictive value in the case of suspicious or indeterminate nodules. We aimed to identify clinical predictors of malignancy in the subset of patients with suspicious FNA cytology. METHODS: We reviewed the electronic medical records of 462 patients who had FNA of thyroid nodules at our institution with a suspicious cytological diagnosis, and underwent surgery at Mayo Clinic between January 2004 and September 2008. Demographic data including age, gender, history of exposure to radiation and use of thyroid hormone was collected. The presence of single versus multiple nodules by ultrasonography, nodule size, and serum thyroid-stimulating harmone (TSH) level before thyroid surgery were recorded. Analysis of the latter was limited to patients not taking thyroid hormone or antithyroid drugs at the time of FNA. RESULTS: Of the 462 patients, 327 had lesions suspicious for follicular neoplasm (S-FN) or Hürthle cell neoplasm (S-HCN), 125 had cytology suspicious for papillary carcinoma (S-PC) and 10 had a variety of other suspicious lesions (medullary cancer, lymphoma and atypical). Malignancy rate for suspicious neoplastic lesions (FN+HCN) was ∼15%, whereas malignancy rate for lesions S-PC was 77%. Neither age, serum TSH level, or history of radiation exposure were associated with increased malignancy risk. The presence of multiple nodules (41.1% vs. 26.4%, p=0.0014) or smaller nodule size (2.6±1.8 cm vs. 2.9±1.6 cm, p=0.008) was associated with higher malignancy risk. In patients with cytology suspicious for neoplasm (FN, HCN) malignancy risk was higher in those receiving thyroid hormone therapy than in nonthyroid hormone users (37.7% vs. 16.5%, p=0.0004; odds ratio: 3.1), although serum TSH values did not differ significantly between thyroid hormone users and nonusers. CONCLUSION: In patients with cytologically suspicious thyroid nodules, the presence of multiple nodules or smaller nodule size was associated with increased risk of malignancy. In addition, our study demonstrates for the first time, an increased risk of malignancy in patients with nodules suspicious for neoplasm who are taking thyroid hormone therapy. The reason for this association is unknown.
BACKGROUND: Fine needle aspiration (FNA), although very reliable for cytologically benign and malignant thyroid nodules, has much lower predictive value in the case of suspicious or indeterminate nodules. We aimed to identify clinical predictors of malignancy in the subset of patients with suspicious FNA cytology. METHODS: We reviewed the electronic medical records of 462 patients who had FNA of thyroid nodules at our institution with a suspicious cytological diagnosis, and underwent surgery at Mayo Clinic between January 2004 and September 2008. Demographic data including age, gender, history of exposure to radiation and use of thyroid hormone was collected. The presence of single versus multiple nodules by ultrasonography, nodule size, and serum thyroid-stimulating harmone (TSH) level before thyroid surgery were recorded. Analysis of the latter was limited to patients not taking thyroid hormone or antithyroid drugs at the time of FNA. RESULTS: Of the 462 patients, 327 had lesions suspicious for follicular neoplasm (S-FN) or Hürthle cell neoplasm (S-HCN), 125 had cytology suspicious for papillary carcinoma (S-PC) and 10 had a variety of other suspicious lesions (medullary cancer, lymphoma and atypical). Malignancy rate for suspicious neoplastic lesions (FN+HCN) was ∼15%, whereas malignancy rate for lesions S-PC was 77%. Neither age, serum TSH level, or history of radiation exposure were associated with increased malignancy risk. The presence of multiple nodules (41.1% vs. 26.4%, p=0.0014) or smaller nodule size (2.6±1.8 cm vs. 2.9±1.6 cm, p=0.008) was associated with higher malignancy risk. In patients with cytology suspicious for neoplasm (FN, HCN) malignancy risk was higher in those receiving thyroid hormone therapy than in nonthyroid hormone users (37.7% vs. 16.5%, p=0.0004; odds ratio: 3.1), although serum TSH values did not differ significantly between thyroid hormone users and nonusers. CONCLUSION: In patients with cytologically suspicious thyroid nodules, the presence of multiple nodules or smaller nodule size was associated with increased risk of malignancy. In addition, our study demonstrates for the first time, an increased risk of malignancy in patients with nodules suspicious for neoplasm who are taking thyroid hormone therapy. The reason for this association is unknown.
Authors: E Papini; L Petrucci; R Guglielmi; C Panunzi; R Rinaldi; V Bacci; A Crescenzi; F Nardi; R Fabbrini; C M Pacella Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 1998-03 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: K Boelaert; J Horacek; R L Holder; J C Watkinson; M C Sheppard; J A Franklyn Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2006-07-25 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Megan Rist Haymart; Daniel John Repplinger; Glen E Leverson; Diane F Elson; Rebecca S Sippel; Juan Carlos Jaume; Herbert Chen Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2007-12-26 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: M-L Matthey-Gie; S M Walsh; A C O'Neill; A Lowery; D Evoy; D Gibbons; R S Prichard; S Skehan; E W McDermott Journal: Ir J Med Sci Date: 2014-01-09 Impact factor: 1.568
Authors: Huang Huang; Jennifer Rusiecki; Nan Zhao; Yingtai Chen; Shuangge Ma; Herbert Yu; Mary H Ward; Robert Udelsman; Yawei Zhang Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2017-04-04 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Kristine S Wong; Vickie Y Jo; Alarice C Lowe; William C Faquin; Andrew A Renshaw; Akeesha A Shah; Michael H Roh; Edward B Stelow; Jeffrey F Krane Journal: Cancer Cytopathol Date: 2019-11-21 Impact factor: 5.284