OBJECTIVE: Extremely low birth weight infants often require rehospitalization during infancy. Our objective was to identify at the time of discharge which extremely low birth weight infants are at higher risk for rehospitalization. METHODS: Data from extremely low birth weight infants in Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network centers from 2002-2005 were analyzed. The primary outcome was rehospitalization by the 18- to 22-month follow-up, and secondary outcome was rehospitalization for respiratory causes in the first year. Using variables and odds ratios identified by stepwise logistic regression, scoring systems were developed with scores proportional to odds ratios. Classification and regression-tree analysis was performed by recursive partitioning and automatic selection of optimal cutoff points of variables. RESULTS: A total of 3787 infants were evaluated (mean ± SD birth weight: 787 ± 136 g; gestational age: 26 ± 2 weeks; 48% male, 42% black). Forty-five percent of the infants were rehospitalized by 18 to 22 months; 14.7% were rehospitalized for respiratory causes in the first year. Both regression models (area under the curve: 0.63) and classification and regression-tree models (mean misclassification rate: 40%-42%) were moderately accurate. Predictors for the primary outcome by regression were shunt surgery for hydrocephalus, hospital stay of >120 days for pulmonary reasons, necrotizing enterocolitis stage II or higher or spontaneous gastrointestinal perforation, higher fraction of inspired oxygen at 36 weeks, and male gender. By classification and regression-tree analysis, infants with hospital stays of >120 days for pulmonary reasons had a 66% rehospitalization rate compared with 42% without such a stay. CONCLUSIONS: The scoring systems and classification and regression-tree analysis models identified infants at higher risk of rehospitalization and might assist planning for care after discharge.
OBJECTIVE: Extremely low birth weight infants often require rehospitalization during infancy. Our objective was to identify at the time of discharge which extremely low birth weight infants are at higher risk for rehospitalization. METHODS: Data from extremely low birth weight infants in Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network centers from 2002-2005 were analyzed. The primary outcome was rehospitalization by the 18- to 22-month follow-up, and secondary outcome was rehospitalization for respiratory causes in the first year. Using variables and odds ratios identified by stepwise logistic regression, scoring systems were developed with scores proportional to odds ratios. Classification and regression-tree analysis was performed by recursive partitioning and automatic selection of optimal cutoff points of variables. RESULTS: A total of 3787 infants were evaluated (mean ± SD birth weight: 787 ± 136 g; gestational age: 26 ± 2 weeks; 48% male, 42% black). Forty-five percent of the infants were rehospitalized by 18 to 22 months; 14.7% were rehospitalized for respiratory causes in the first year. Both regression models (area under the curve: 0.63) and classification and regression-tree models (mean misclassification rate: 40%-42%) were moderately accurate. Predictors for the primary outcome by regression were shunt surgery for hydrocephalus, hospital stay of >120 days for pulmonary reasons, necrotizing enterocolitis stage II or higher or spontaneous gastrointestinal perforation, higher fraction of inspired oxygen at 36 weeks, and male gender. By classification and regression-tree analysis, infants with hospital stays of >120 days for pulmonary reasons had a 66% rehospitalization rate compared with 42% without such a stay. CONCLUSIONS: The scoring systems and classification and regression-tree analysis models identified infants at higher risk of rehospitalization and might assist planning for care after discharge.
Authors: Barbara J Stoll; Nellie I Hansen; Edward F Bell; Seetha Shankaran; Abbot R Laptook; Michele C Walsh; Ellen C Hale; Nancy S Newman; Kurt Schibler; Waldemar A Carlo; Kathleen A Kennedy; Brenda B Poindexter; Neil N Finer; Richard A Ehrenkranz; Shahnaz Duara; Pablo J Sánchez; T Michael O'Shea; Ronald N Goldberg; Krisa P Van Meurs; Roger G Faix; Dale L Phelps; Ivan D Frantz; Kristi L Watterberg; Shampa Saha; Abhik Das; Rosemary D Higgins Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2010-08-23 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: A Lamarche-Vadel; B Blondel; P Truffer; A Burguet; G Cambonie; D Selton; C Arnaud; C Lardennois; C du Mazaubrun; S N'Guyen; J Mathis; G Bréart; M Kaminski Journal: Acta Paediatr Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 2.299
Authors: Susan R Hintz; Douglas E Kendrick; Barbara J Stoll; Betty R Vohr; Avroy A Fanaroff; Edward F Donovan; W Kenneth Poole; Martin L Blakely; Linda Wright; Rosemary Higgins Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Rebecca B Russell; Nancy S Green; Claudia A Steiner; Susan Meikle; Jennifer L Howse; Karalee Poschman; Todd Dias; Lisa Potetz; Michael J Davidoff; Karla Damus; Joann R Petrini Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Mar Janna Dahl; Sydney Bowen; Toshio Aoki; Andrew Rebentisch; Elaine Dawson; Luke Pettet; Haleigh Emerson; Baifeng Yu; Zhengming Wang; Haixia Yang; Chong Zhang; Angela P Presson; Lisa Joss-Moore; Donald M Null; Bradley A Yoder; Kurt H Albertine Journal: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol Date: 2018-09-13 Impact factor: 5.464
Authors: Nicholas K Schiltz; Beth Finkelstein Rosenthal; Moira A Crowley; Siran M Koroukian; Ann Nevar; Sharon B Meropol; Leona Cuttler Journal: Clin Pediatr (Phila) Date: 2014-06-04 Impact factor: 1.168
Authors: Keng Jin Lee; Sara K Berkelhamer; Gina A Kim; Joann M Taylor; Kelly M O'Shea; Robin H Steinhorn; Kathryn N Farrow Journal: Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 6.914