Literature DB >> 22006545

Syntrophic interactions improve power production in formic acid fed MFCs operated with set anode potentials or fixed resistances.

Dan Sun1, Douglas F Call, Patrick D Kiely, Aijie Wang, Bruce E Logan.   

Abstract

Formic acid is a highly energetic electron donor but it has previously resulted in low power densities in microbial fuel cells (MFCs). Three different set anode potentials (-0.30, -0.15, and +0.15 V; vs. a standard hydrogen electrode, SHE) were used to evaluate syntrophic interactions in bacterial communities for formic acid degradation relative to a non-controlled, high resistance system (1,000 Ω external resistance). No current was generated at -0.30 V, suggesting a lack of direct formic acid oxidation (standard reduction potential: -0.40 V). More positive potentials that allowed for acetic acid utilization all produced current, with the best performance at -0.15 V. The anode community in the -0.15 V reactor, based on 16S rDNA clone libraries, was 58% Geobacter sulfurreducens and 17% Acetobacterium, with lower proportions of these genera found in the other two MFCs. Acetic acid was detected in all MFCs suggesting that current generation by G. sulfurreducens was dependent on acetic acid production by Acetobacterium. When all MFCs were subsequently operated at an external resistance for maximum power production (100 Ω for MFCs originally set at -0.15 and +0.15 V; 150 Ω for the control), they produced similar power densities and exhibited the same midpoint potential of -0.15 V in first derivative cyclic voltammetry scans. All of the mixed communities converged to similar proportions of the two predominant genera (ca. 52% G. sulfurreducens and 22% Acetobacterium). These results show that syntrophic interactions can be enhanced through setting certain anode potentials, and that long-term performance produces stable and convergent communities.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22006545     DOI: 10.1002/bit.23348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng        ISSN: 0006-3592            Impact factor:   4.530


  7 in total

1.  Use of a coculture to enable current production by geobacter sulfurreducens.

Authors:  Youpeng Qu; Yujie Feng; Xin Wang; Bruce E Logan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Characterization of the genome from Geobacter anodireducens, a strain with enhanced current production in bioelectrochemical systems.

Authors:  Dan Sun; Xinyuan Wan; Wenzong Liu; Xue Xia; Fangliang Huang; Aijie Wang; Jessica A Smith; Yan Dang; Dawn E Holmes
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 4.036

3.  Metagenomic analyses reveal the involvement of syntrophic consortia in methanol/electricity conversion in microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  Ayaka Yamamuro; Atsushi Kouzuma; Takashi Abe; Kazuya Watanabe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Segregation of the Anodic Microbial Communities in a Microbial Fuel Cell Cascade.

Authors:  Douglas M Hodgson; Ann Smith; Sonal Dahale; James P Stratford; Jia V Li; André Grüning; Michael E Bushell; Julian R Marchesi; C Avignone Rossa
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Effect of Contact Area and Shape of Anode Current Collectors on Bacterial Community Structure in Microbial Fuel Cells.

Authors:  Agathe Paitier; Naoufel Haddour; Chantal Gondran; Timothy M Vogel
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  Convergent development of anodic bacterial communities in microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  Matthew D Yates; Patrick D Kiely; Douglas F Call; Hamid Rismani-Yazdi; Kyle Bibby; Jordan Peccia; John M Regan; Bruce E Logan
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 10.302

7.  Set anode potentials affect the electron fluxes and microbial community structure in propionate-fed microbial electrolysis cells.

Authors:  Ananda Rao Hari; Krishna P Katuri; Bruce E Logan; Pascal E Saikaly
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.