Literature DB >> 22004979

Parallel contributions of cerebellar, striatal and M1 mechanisms to motor sequence learning.

Virginia B Penhune1, Christopher J Steele.   

Abstract

When learning a new motor sequence, we must execute the correct order of movements while simultaneously optimizing sensorimotor parameters such as trajectory, timing, velocity and force. Neurophysiological studies in animals and humans have identified the major brain regions involved in sequence learning, including the motor cortex (M1), basal ganglia (BG) and cerebellum. Current models link these regions to different stages of learning (early vs. late) or different components of performance (spatial vs. sensorimotor). At the same time, research in motor control has given rise to the concept that internal models at different levels of the motor system may contribute to learning. The goal of this review is to develop a new framework for motor sequence learning that combines stage and component models within the context of internal models. To do this, we review behavioral and neuroimaging studies in humans and neurophysiological studies in animals. Based on this evidence, we present a model proposing that sequence learning is underwritten by parallel, interacting processes, including internal model formation and sequence representation, that are instantiated in specific cerebellar, BG or M1 mechanisms depending on task demands and the stage of learning. The striatal system learns predictive stimulus-response associations and is critical for motor chunking. The role of the cerebellum is to acquire the optimal internal model for sequence performance in a particular context, and to contribute to error correction and control of on-going movement. M1 acts to store the representation of a learned sequence, likely as part of a distributed network including the parietal lobe and premotor cortex.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22004979     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.09.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  110 in total

1.  Locomotor impact of beneficial or nonbeneficial H-reflex conditioning after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Yi Chen; Lu Chen; Rongliang Liu; Yu Wang; Xiang Yang Chen; Jonathan R Wolpaw
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Consensus paper: the cerebellum's role in movement and cognition.

Authors:  Leonard F Koziol; Deborah Budding; Nancy Andreasen; Stefano D'Arrigo; Sara Bulgheroni; Hiroshi Imamizu; Masao Ito; Mario Manto; Cherie Marvel; Krystal Parker; Giovanni Pezzulo; Narender Ramnani; Daria Riva; Jeremy Schmahmann; Larry Vandervert; Tadashi Yamazaki
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 3.  Consolidating behavioral and neurophysiologic findings to explain the influence of contextual interference during motor sequence learning.

Authors:  David Wright; Willem Verwey; John Buchanen; Jing Chen; Joohyun Rhee; Maarten Immink
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-02

4.  Dissociation of Neural Networks for Predisposition and for Training-Related Plasticity in Auditory-Motor Learning.

Authors:  Sibylle C Herholz; Emily B J Coffey; Christo Pantev; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Why New Spinal Cord Plasticity Does Not Disrupt Old Motor Behaviors.

Authors:  Yi Chen; Lu Chen; Yu Wang; Xiang Yang Chen; Jonathan R Wolpaw
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The impact of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on learning fine-motor sequences.

Authors:  Renee E Shimizu; Allan D Wu; Jasmine K Samra; Barbara J Knowlton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Age-related differences in practice-dependent resting-state functional connectivity related to motor sequence learning.

Authors:  Alison Mary; Vincent Wens; Marc Op de Beeck; Rachel Leproult; Xavier De Tiège; Philippe Peigneux
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Collaboration of Cerebello-Rubral and Cerebello-Striatal Loops in a Motor Preparation Task.

Authors:  Chama Belkhiria; Eya Mssedi; Christophe Habas; Tarak Driss; Giovanni de Marco
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.847

9.  Bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation enhances effector-independent representations of motor synergy and sequence learning.

Authors:  Sheena Waters-Metenier; Masud Husain; Tobias Wiestler; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  α4β2 Nicotinic receptors play a role in the nAChR-mediated decline in L-dopa-induced dyskinesias in parkinsonian rats.

Authors:  Maryka Quik; Carla Campos; Tanuja Bordia; Jon-Paul Strachan; Jenny Zhang; J Michael McIntosh; Sharon Letchworth; Kristen Jordan
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 5.250

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.