Literature DB >> 22004619

An atypical presentation of aortic rupture: intuition and investigation can avoid disaster.

T T Shah1, P Herbert, T Beresford.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Patients with an acute abdomen are a common presentation for those participating in emergency surgery cover. The aetiology of this presentation incorporates the spectrum of organ systems and is often not identified satisfactorily. Nevertheless, certain diagnoses will always be difficult to make and some presentations can be deceptive. Radiological investigations increasingly play a role in establishing an accurate diagnosis and frequently allow prompt management to be instituted.
INTRODUCTION: Patients with an acute abdomen are a common presentation for those participating in emergency surgery cover. The aetiology of this presentation incorporates the spectrum of organ systems and is often not identified satisfactorily. Nevertheless, certain diagnoses will always be difficult to make and some presentations can be deceptive. Radiological investigations increasingly play a role in establishing an accurate diagnosis and frequently allow prompt management to be instituted.
INTRODUCTION: Ruptured AAA should be considered as a differential diagnosis in all elderly patients presenting with acute severe abdominal pain who may be haemodynamically stable. Atypical history and examination with inconsistent or equivocal clinical signs should raise the suspicion of aneurysm, particularly in elderly men with known arterial disease. There should be a low threshold for both requesting and justifying definitive imaging (ie CT) in such cases if a catastrophic outcome through misdiagnosis is to be avoided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22004619      PMCID: PMC5826995          DOI: 10.1308/147870811X602131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  12 in total

1.  The accuracy of physical examination to detect abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  H A Fink; F A Lederle; C S Roth; C A Bowles; D B Nelson; M A Haas
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2000-03-27

2.  Incidence among men of asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms: estimates from 500 screen detected cases.

Authors:  K A Vardulaki; T C Prevost; N M Walker; N E Day; A B Wilmink; C R Quick; H A Ashton; R A Scott
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.136

3.  The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have abdominal aortic aneurysm? .

Authors:  F A Lederle; D L Simel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-01-06       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Atypical manifestations of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  A Banerjee
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm manifesting as symptomatic inguinal hernia.

Authors:  E W Grabowski; D B Pilcher
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 0.688

6.  Unoperated ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: a retrospective clinicopathological study over a 10-year period.

Authors:  J C McGregor
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Misdiagnosis of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  W A Marston; R Ahlquist; G Johnson; A A Meyer
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.268

8.  Emergency ultrasound of the abdominal aorta by UK emergency physicians: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  B Dent; R J Kendall; A A Boyle; P R T Atkinson
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 9.  Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  P A Cosford; G C Leng
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-04-18

10.  Screening men for abdominal aortic aneurysm: 10 year mortality and cost effectiveness results from the randomised Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study.

Authors:  S G Thompson; H A Ashton; L Gao; R A P Scott
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-06-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.