Literature DB >> 10737283

The accuracy of physical examination to detect abdominal aortic aneurysm.

H A Fink1, F A Lederle, C S Roth, C A Bowles, D B Nelson, M A Haas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Abdominal palpation during physical examination is an important means of detecting abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), but limited information is available on its accuracy.
METHODS: Two hundred subjects (aged 51-88 years), 99 with and 101 without AAA as determined by previous ultrasound, each underwent physical examination of the abdomen by 2 internists who were blinded to each other's findings and to the ultrasound diagnosis.
RESULTS: The overall accuracy of abdominal palpation for detecting AAA was as follows: sensitivity, 68% (95% confidence interval [CI], 60%-76%); specificity, 75% (95% CI, 68%-82%); positive likelihood ratio, 2.7 (95% CI, 2.0-3.6); negative likelihood ratio 0.43 (95% CI, 0.33-0.56). Interobserver pair agreement for AAA vs no AAA between the first and second examinations was 77% (kappa = 0.53). Sensitivity increased with AAA diameter, from 61% for AAAs of 3.0 to 3.9 cm, to 69% for AAAs of 4.0 to 4.9 cm, 72% for AAAs of 4.0 cm or larger, and 82% for AAAs of 5.0 cm or larger. Sensitivity in subjects with an abdominal girth less than 100 cm (40-in waistline) was 91% vs 53% for girth of 100 cm or greater (P<.001). When girth was 100 cm or greater and the aorta was palpable, sensitivity was 82%. When girth was less than 100 cm and the AAA was 5.0 cm or larger, sensitivity was 100% (12 examinations). Factors independently associated with correct examination findings included AAA diameter (odds ratio [OR], 1.95 per centimeter increase; 95% CI, 1.06-3.58); abdominal girth (OR, 0.90 per centimeter increase; 95% CI, 0.87-0.94); and the examiner's assessment that the abdomen was not tight (OR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.17-6.13).
CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal palpation has only moderate overall sensitivity for detecting AAA, but appears to be highly sensitive for diagnosis of AAAs large enough to warrant elective intervention in patients who do not have a large girth. Abdominal palpation has good sensitivity even in patients with a large girth if the aorta is palpable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10737283     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.160.6.833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  23 in total

1.  Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm presenting as groin pain.

Authors:  Richard M Lynch
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  An atypical presentation of aortic rupture: intuition and investigation can avoid disaster.

Authors:  T T Shah; P Herbert; T Beresford
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 3.  Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Kate Clancy; James Wong; Allison Spicher
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2019-10-25

4.  Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA): cost-effectiveness of screening, surveillance of intermediate-sized AAA, and management of symptomatic AAA.

Authors:  Marc D Silverstein; Stephen R Pitts; Elliot L Chaikof; David J Ballard
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2005-10

5.  Management of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Authors:  Jennifer M Dehlin; Gilbert R Upchurch
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2005-06

6.  Clinical detection of abdominal aortic aneurysm in a 74-year-old man in chiropractic practice.

Authors:  Nathan J de Boer; Simone F C Knaap; Annemarie de Zoete
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2010-03

7.  Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2006-01-01

Review 8.  Circulating markers of abdominal aortic aneurysm presence and progression.

Authors:  Jonathan Golledge; Philip S Tsao; Ronald L Dalman; Paul E Norman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  An aortic wall to vertebral body fistula presenting as a lytic lesion.

Authors:  Paul Farnsworth; Katie Bailey; Erika Baardsen; Jean Johnson
Journal:  J Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2020-09-30

10.  Impact of Body Mass Index on Clinical Axillary Nodal Assessment in Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Damian McCartan; Michelle Stempel; Anne Eaton; Monica Morrow; Melissa Pilewskie
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.