Literature DB >> 22004519

Identification of inorganic improvised explosive devices using sequential injection capillary electrophoresis and contactless conductivity detection.

Gustavo A Blanco1, Yi H Nai, Emily F Hilder, Robert A Shellie, Greg W Dicinoski, Paul R Haddad, Michael C Breadmore.   

Abstract

A simple sequential injection capillary electrophoresis (SI-CE) instrument with capacitively coupled contactless conductivity detection (C(4)D) has been developed for the rapid separation of anions relevant to the identification of inorganic improvised explosive devices (IEDs). Four of the most common explosive tracer ions, nitrate, perchlorate, chlorate, and azide, and the most common background ions, chloride, sulfate, thiocyanate, fluoride, phosphate, and carbonate, were chosen for investigation. Using a separation electrolyte comprising 50 mM tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane, 50 mM cyclohexyl-2-aminoethanesulfonic acid, pH 8.9 and 0.05% poly(ethyleneimine) (PEI) in a hexadimethrine bromide (HDMB)-coated capillary it was possible to partially separate all 10 ions within 90 s. The combination of two cationic polymer additives (PEI and HDMB) was necessary to achieve adequate selectivity with a sufficiently stable electroosmotic flow (EOF), which was not possible with only one polymer. Careful optimization of variables affecting the speed of separation and injection timing allowed a further reduction of separation time to 55 s while maintaining adequate efficiency and resolution. Software control makes high sample throughput possible (60 samples/h), with very high repeatability of migration times [0.63-2.07% relative standard deviation (RSD) for 240 injections]. The separation speed does not compromise sensitivity, with limits of detection ranging from 23 to 50 μg·L(-1) for all the explosive residues considered, which is 10× lower than those achieved by indirect absorbance detection and 2× lower than those achieved by C(4)D using portable benchtop instrumentation. The combination of automation, high sample throughput, high confidence of peak identification, and low limits of detection makes this methodology ideal for the rapid identification of inorganic IED residues.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22004519     DOI: 10.1021/ac2020195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  9 in total

1.  DART-MS analysis of inorganic explosives using high temperature thermal desorption.

Authors:  Thomas P Forbes; Edward Sisco; Matthew Staymates; Greg Gillen
Journal:  Anal Methods       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 2.896

2.  Emerging techniques for the detection of pyrotechnic residues from seized postal packages containing fireworks.

Authors:  Karlijn D B Bezemer; Thomas P Forbes; Annemieke W C Hulsbergen; Jennifer Verkouteren; Shannon T Krauss; Mattijs Koeberg; Peter J Schoenmakers; Greg Gillen; Arian C van Asten
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Detection of nitro-based and peroxide-based explosives by fast polarity-switchable ion mobility spectrometer with ion focusing in vicinity of Faraday detector.

Authors:  Qinghua Zhou; Liying Peng; Dandan Jiang; Xin Wang; Haiyan Wang; Haiyang Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  On-site rapid detection of trace non-volatile inorganic explosives by stand-alone ion mobility spectrometry via acid-enhanced evaporization.

Authors:  Liying Peng; Lei Hua; Weiguo Wang; Qinghua Zhou; Haiyang Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Ultrasensitive, Real-time and Discriminative Detection of Improvised Explosives by Chemiresistive Thin-film Sensory Array of Mn(2+) Tailored Hierarchical ZnS.

Authors:  Chaoyu Zhou; Zhaofeng Wu; Yanan Guo; Yushu Li; Hongyu Cao; Xuefang Zheng; Xincun Dou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Time-Resolved Pharmacological Studies using Automated, On-line Monitoring of Five Parallel Suspension Cultures.

Authors:  Ala A Alhusban; Michael C Breadmore; Nuri Gueven; Rosanne M Guijt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  A Study on Double Inputs Direct Contact and Single Output Capacitively Coupled Conductivity Detector.

Authors:  Shuangfei Zhang; Hongyan Yuan; Dan Xiao
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  An Integrated Portable Multiplex Microchip Device for Fingerprinting Chemical Warfare Agents.

Authors:  Karolina Petkovic; Anthony Swallow; Robert Stewart; Yuan Gao; Sheng Li; Fiona Glenn; Januar Gotama; Mel Dell'Olio; Michael Best; Justin Doward; Simon Ovendon; Yonggang Zhu
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 2.891

9.  Qualitative Detection Toward Military and Improvised Explosive Vapors by a Facile TiO2 Nanosheet-Based Chemiresistive Sensor Array.

Authors:  Yushu Li; Wenyi Zhou; Baiyi Zu; Xincun Dou
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 5.221

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.