Literature DB >> 22004168

Children discard a resource to avoid inequity.

Alex Shaw1, Kristina R Olson.   

Abstract

Elucidating how inequity aversion (a tendency to dislike and correct unequal outcomes) functions as one develops is important to understanding more complex fairness considerations in adulthood. Although previous research has demonstrated that adults and children reduce inequity, it is unclear if people are actually responding negatively to inequity or if people dislike others getting more than them (motivated by social comparison) and like to share maximal resources, especially with those who have few resources (motivated by social welfare preferences). In order to evaluate if children are truly averse to inequity, we had 3- to 8-year-old children distribute resources to 3rd parties and found that 6- to 8-year-old children would rather throw a resource in the trash than distribute unequally, suggesting that concerns with equity can trump concerns with maximal sharing. We also demonstrated that children's reactions were not based on wanting to avoid upsetting the recipients or based on a preference for visual symmetry and that children will even throw away a resource that could have gone to themselves in order to avoid inequity. These results demonstrate the existence of inequity aversion in children, provide a new method for studying inequity aversion specifically, and suggest the need for new models to explain why inequity aversion may have evolved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22004168     DOI: 10.1037/a0025907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  49 in total

1.  Human children but not chimpanzees make irrational decisions driven by social comparison.

Authors:  Esther Herrmann; Lou M Haux; Henriette Zeidler; Jan M Engelmann
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Evolution of fairness in the one-shot anonymous Ultimatum Game.

Authors:  David G Rand; Corina E Tarnita; Hisashi Ohtsuki; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  'To the victor go the spoils': Infants expect resources to align with dominance structures.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Enright; Hyowon Gweon; Jessica A Sommerville
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2017-03-24

4.  When fairness matters less than we expect.

Authors:  Gus Cooney; Daniel T Gilbert; Timothy D Wilson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Sentiment Analysis in Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders in an Ingroup/Outgroup Setting.

Authors:  E Vaucheret Paz; M Martino; M Hyland; M Corletto; C Puga; M Peralta; N Deltetto; T Kuhlmann; D Cavalié; M Leist; B Duarte; I Lascombes
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2020-01

6.  Balancing the Fair Treatment of Others While Preserving Group Identity and Autonomy.

Authors:  Melanie Killen; Laura Elenbaas; Adam Rutland
Journal:  Hum Dev       Date:  2016-04

7.  Development of in-group favoritism in children's third-party punishment of selfishness.

Authors:  Jillian J Jordan; Katherine McAuliffe; Felix Warneken
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Developmental Differences in Infants' Fairness Expectations From 6 to 15 Months of Age.

Authors:  Talee Ziv; Jessica A Sommerville
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2016-11-21

9.  Anti-equality: social comparison in young children.

Authors:  Mark Sheskin; Paul Bloom; Karen Wynn
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-11-28

10.  Children rectify inequalities for disadvantaged groups.

Authors:  Laura Elenbaas; Melanie Killen
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2016-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.