Literature DB >> 22001681

Bipolar spinal cord stimulation attenuates mechanical hypersensitivity at an intensity that activates a small portion of A-fiber afferents in spinal nerve-injured rats.

F Yang1, A F Carteret, P W Wacnik, C-Y Chung, L Xing, X Dong, R A Meyer, S N Raja, Y Guan.   

Abstract

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is used clinically to treat neuropathic pain states, but the precise mechanism by which it attenuates neuropathic pain remains to be established. The profile of afferent fiber activation during SCS and how it may correlate with the efficacy of SCS-induced analgesia are unclear. After subjecting rats to an L5 spinal nerve ligation (SNL), we implanted a miniature quadripolar electrode similar to that used clinically. Our goal was to determine the population and number of afferent fibers retrogradely activated by SCS in SNL rats by recording the antidromic compound action potential (AP) at the sciatic nerve after examining the ability of bipolar epidural SCS to alleviate mechanical hypersensitivity in this model. Notably, we compared the profiles of afferent fiber activation to SCS between SNL rats that exhibited good SCS-induced analgesia (responders) and those that did not (nonresponders). Additionally, we examined how different contact configurations affect the motor threshold (MoT) and compound AP threshold. Results showed that three consecutive days of SCS treatment (50 Hz, 0.2 ms, 30 min, 80-90% of MoT), but not sham stimulation, gradually alleviated mechanical hypersensitivity in SNL rats. The MoT obtained in the animal behavioral study was significantly less than the Aα/β-threshold of the compound AP determined during electrophysiological recording, suggesting that SCS could attenuate mechanical hypersensitivity with a stimulus intensity that recruits only a small fraction of the A-fiber population in SNL rats. Although both the MoT and compound AP threshold were similar between responders and nonresponders, the size of the compound AP waveform at higher stimulation intensities was larger in the responders, indicating a more efficient activation of the dorsal column structure in responders.
Copyright © 2011 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22001681     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.09.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  17 in total

Review 1.  Spinal cord stimulation: neurophysiological and neurochemical mechanisms of action.

Authors:  Yun Guan
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2012-06

2.  Assessment of axonal recruitment using model-guided preclinical spinal cord stimulation in the ex vivo adult mouse spinal cord.

Authors:  Shaquia Idlett; Mallika Halder; Tianhe Zhang; Jorge Quevedo; Natalie Brill; Wendy Gu; Michael Moffitt; Shawn Hochman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Comparison of intensity-dependent inhibition of spinal wide-dynamic range neurons by dorsal column and peripheral nerve stimulation in a rat model of neuropathic pain.

Authors:  F Yang; Q Xu; Y-K Cheong; R Shechter; A Sdrulla; S-Q He; V Tiwari; X Dong; P W Wacnik; R Meyer; S N Raja; Y Guan
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 3.931

4.  Conventional and kilohertz-frequency spinal cord stimulation produces intensity- and frequency-dependent inhibition of mechanical hypersensitivity in a rat model of neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Ronen Shechter; Fei Yang; Qian Xu; Yong-Kwan Cheong; Shao-Qiu He; Andrei Sdrulla; Alene F Carteret; Paul W Wacnik; Xinzhong Dong; Richard A Meyer; Srinivasa N Raja; Yun Guan
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Spinal cord stimulation reduces mechanical hyperalgesia and glial cell activation in animals with neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Karina L Sato; Lisa M Johanek; Luciana S Sanada; Kathleen A Sluka
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Peripherally Acting μ-Opioid Receptor Agonists Attenuate Ongoing Pain-associated Behavior and Spontaneous Neuronal Activity after Nerve Injury in Rats.

Authors:  Vinod Tiwari; Michael Anderson; Fei Yang; Vineeta Tiwari; Qin Zheng; Shao-Qiu He; Tong Zhang; Bin Shu; Xueming Chen; Shaness A Grenald; Kimberly E Stephens; Zhiyong Chen; Xinzhong Dong; Srinivasa N Raja; Yun Guan
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Treating Low Back Pain in Failed Back Surgery Patients with Multicolumn-lead Spinal Cord Stimulation.

Authors:  Thibault Remacle; Nathalie Gilis; Stéphane Mauviel; Jean Michel Remacle
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 1.355

8.  Intra-spinal microstimulation may alleviate chronic pain after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Bin Shu; Fei Yang; Yun Guan
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 1.538

9.  The Impact of Electrical Charge Delivery on Inhibition of Mechanical Hypersensitivity in Nerve-Injured Rats by Sub-Sensory Threshold Spinal Cord Stimulation.

Authors:  Zhiyong Chen; Qian Huang; Fei Yang; Christine Shi; Eellan Sivanesan; Shuguang Liu; Xueming Chen; Sridevi V Sarma; Louis P Vera-Portocarrero; Bengt Linderoth; Srinivasa N Raja; Yun Guan
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2018-12-17

Review 10.  Spinal Cord Stimulation for Treating Chronic Pain: Reviewing Preclinical and Clinical Data on Paresthesia-Free High-Frequency Therapy.

Authors:  Krishnan Chakravarthy; Hira Richter; Paul J Christo; Kayode Williams; Yun Guan
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2017-11-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.