Literature DB >> 30556616

The Impact of Electrical Charge Delivery on Inhibition of Mechanical Hypersensitivity in Nerve-Injured Rats by Sub-Sensory Threshold Spinal Cord Stimulation.

Zhiyong Chen1, Qian Huang1, Fei Yang1,2, Christine Shi1, Eellan Sivanesan1, Shuguang Liu1,3, Xueming Chen4, Sridevi V Sarma5, Louis P Vera-Portocarrero6, Bengt Linderoth7, Srinivasa N Raja1, Yun Guan1,8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) represents an important neurostimulation therapy for pain. A new ultra-high frequency (10,000 Hz) SCS paradigm has shown improved pain relief without eliciting paresthesia. We aim to determine whether sub-sensory threshold SCS of lower frequencies also can inhibit mechanical hypersensitivity in nerve-injured rats and examine how electric charge delivery of stimulation may affect pain inhibition by different patterns of subthreshold SCS.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used a custom-made quadripolar electrode (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) to provide bipolar SCS epidurally at the T10 to T12 vertebral level. According to previous findings, SCS was tested at 40% of the motor threshold, which is considered to be a sub-sensory threshold intensity in rats. Paw withdrawal thresholds to punctate mechanical stimulation were measured before and after SCS in rats that received an L5 spinal nerve ligation.
RESULTS: Both 10,000 Hz (10 kHz, 0.024 msec) and lower frequencies (200 Hz, 1 msec; 500 Hz, 0.5 msec; 1200 Hz; 0.2 msec) of subthreshold SCS (120 min) attenuated mechanical hypersensitivity, as indicated by increased paw withdrawal thresholds after stimulation in spinal nerve ligation rats. Pain inhibition from different patterns of subthreshold SCS was not governed by individual stimulation parameters. However, correlation analysis suggests that pain inhibition from 10 kHz subthreshold SCS in individual animals was positively correlated with the electric charges delivered per second (electrical dose).
CONCLUSIONS: Inhibition of neuropathic mechanical hypersensitivity can be achieved with low-frequency subthreshold SCS by optimizing the electric charge delivery, which may affect the effect of SCS in individual animals.
© 2018 International Neuromodulation Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electrical charge; nerve injury; pain; rat; spinal cord stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30556616      PMCID: PMC6374184          DOI: 10.1111/ner.12910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuromodulation        ISSN: 1094-7159


  46 in total

Review 1.  Molecular mechanisms of nociception.

Authors:  D Julius; A I Basbaum
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-09-13       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Nociceptors--noxious stimulus detectors.

Authors:  Clifford J Woolf; Qiufu Ma
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Spinal cord reflexes induced by epidural spinal cord stimulation in normal awake rats.

Authors:  Yury P Gerasimenko; Igor A Lavrov; Gregoire Courtine; Ronaldo M Ichiyama; Christine J Dy; Hui Zhong; Roland R Roy; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Distinct subsets of unmyelinated primary sensory fibers mediate behavioral responses to noxious thermal and mechanical stimuli.

Authors:  Daniel J Cavanaugh; Hyosang Lee; Liching Lo; Shannon D Shields; Mark J Zylka; Allan I Basbaum; David J Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Mechanisms of neuropathic pain.

Authors:  James N Campbell; Richard A Meyer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 6.  Neuropathic pain: aetiology, symptoms, mechanisms, and management.

Authors:  C J Woolf; R J Mannion
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-06-05       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Rat dorsal horn nociceptive-specific neurons are more sensitive than wide dynamic range neurons to depression by immobilizing doses of volatile anesthetics: an effect partially reversed by the opioid receptor antagonist naloxone.

Authors:  Linda S Barter; Earl E Carstens; Steven L Jinks; Joseph F Antognini
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Low frequencies, but not high frequencies of bi-polar spinal cord stimulation reduce cutaneous and muscle hyperalgesia induced by nerve injury.

Authors:  Y Maeda; P W Wacnik; K A Sluka
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Spinal cord stimulation inhibits long-term potentiation of spinal wide dynamic range neurons.

Authors:  Johan Wallin; Atle Fiskå; Arne Tjølsen; Bengt Linderoth; Kjell Hole
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-23       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 10.  Neuropathic pain: a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Ralf Baron
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2009
View more
  4 in total

1.  Real-World Outcomes Using a Spinal Cord Stimulation Device Capable of Combination Therapy for Chronic Pain: A European, Multicenter Experience.

Authors:  Jan Willem Kallewaard; Jose Francisco Paz-Solis; Pasquale De Negri; Maria Angeles Canós-Verdecho; Hayat Belaid; Simon J Thomson; David Abejón; Jan Vesper; Vivek Mehta; Philippe Rigoard; Paolo Maino; Sarah Love-Jones; Isaac F Peña; Simon Bayerl; Christophe Perruchoud; Renaud Bougeard; Cleo Mertz; Yu Pei; Roshini Jain
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Dorsal column and root stimulation at Aβ-fiber intensity activate superficial dorsal horn glutamatergic and GABAergic populations.

Authors:  Wei Fan; Steve J Sullivan; Andrei D Sdrulla
Journal:  Mol Pain       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.395

3.  Spinal Cord Stimulation Attenuates Below-Level Mechanical Hypersensitivity in Rats After Thoracic Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Wanru Duan; Qian Huang; Fei Yang; Shao-Qiu He; Yun Guan
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2020-08-08

4.  The influence of High Dose Spinal Cord Stimulation on the descending pain modulatory system in patients with failed back surgery syndrome.

Authors:  Sander De Groote; Lisa Goudman; Ronald Peeters; Bengt Linderoth; Peter Van Schuerbeek; Stefan Sunaert; Mats De Jaeger; Ann De Smedt; José De Andrés; Maarten Moens
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 4.881

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.