OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to report the evidence for effectiveness of different self-management course characteristics and components for chronic musculoskeletal pain. METHODS: We searched 9 relevant electronic databases for randomized, controlled trials (RCTs). Two reviewers selected studies against inclusion criteria and assessed their quality. We classified RCTs according to type of course delivery (group, individual, mixed or remote), tutor (healthcare professional, lay or mixed), setting (medical, community or occupational), duration (more or less than 8 weeks), and the number and type of components (psychological, lifestyle, pain education, mind body therapies, and physical activity). We extracted data on pain intensity, physical function, self-efficacy, global health, and depression and compared these outcomes for self-management and usual care or waiting list control. We used random effects standardized mean difference meta-analysis. We looked for patterns of clinically important and statistically significant beneficial effects for courses with different delivery characteristics and the presence or absence of components across outcomes over 3 follow-up intervals. RESULTS: We included 46 RCTs (N=8539). Group-delivered courses that had healthcare professional input showed more beneficial effects. Longer courses did not necessarily give better outcomes. There was mixed evidence of effectiveness for components of courses, but data for courses with a psychological component showed slightly more consistent beneficial effects over each follow-up period. DISCUSSION: Serious consideration should be given to the development of short (<8 weeks) group and healthcare professional-delivered interventions but more research is required to establish the most effective and cost-effective course components.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to report the evidence for effectiveness of different self-management course characteristics and components for chronic musculoskeletal pain. METHODS: We searched 9 relevant electronic databases for randomized, controlled trials (RCTs). Two reviewers selected studies against inclusion criteria and assessed their quality. We classified RCTs according to type of course delivery (group, individual, mixed or remote), tutor (healthcare professional, lay or mixed), setting (medical, community or occupational), duration (more or less than 8 weeks), and the number and type of components (psychological, lifestyle, pain education, mind body therapies, and physical activity). We extracted data on pain intensity, physical function, self-efficacy, global health, and depression and compared these outcomes for self-management and usual care or waiting list control. We used random effects standardized mean difference meta-analysis. We looked for patterns of clinically important and statistically significant beneficial effects for courses with different delivery characteristics and the presence or absence of components across outcomes over 3 follow-up intervals. RESULTS: We included 46 RCTs (N=8539). Group-delivered courses that had healthcare professional input showed more beneficial effects. Longer courses did not necessarily give better outcomes. There was mixed evidence of effectiveness for components of courses, but data for courses with a psychological component showed slightly more consistent beneficial effects over each follow-up period. DISCUSSION: Serious consideration should be given to the development of short (<8 weeks) group and healthcare professional-delivered interventions but more research is required to establish the most effective and cost-effective course components.
Authors: Jessica S Merlin; Melonie Walcott; Robert Kerns; Matthew J Bair; Kathryn L Burgio; Janet M Turan Journal: Pain Med Date: 2015-02-03 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Manu Thakral; Michael Von Korff; Susan M McCurry; Charles M Morin; Michael V Vitiello Journal: Sleep Med Rev Date: 2019-11-09 Impact factor: 11.609
Authors: Ana Howarth; Muhammad Riaz; Linda Perkins-Porras; Jared G Smith; Jeevakan Subramaniam; Claire Copland; Mike Hurley; Iain Beith; Michael Ussher Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2019-04-22
Authors: Corinna E Löckenhoff; Seth S Laucks; Alexander D Port; Judy Tung; Elaine Wethington; M Carrington Reid Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2012-10-26
Authors: Mark Sullivan; Dale J Langford; Pamela Stitzlein Davies; Christine Tran; Roger Vilardaga; Gifford Cheung; Daisy Yoo; Justin McReynolds; William B Lober; David Tauben; Kevin E Vowles Journal: J Pain Date: 2018-03-29 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Nathan Hutting; J Bart Staal; Yvonne F Heerkens; Josephine A Engels; Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden Journal: Trials Date: 2013-08-16 Impact factor: 2.279