Literature DB >> 22001503

Current concepts in the treatment of Anderson Type II odontoid fractures in the elderly in Germany, Austria and Switzerland.

L Löhrer1, M J Raschke, D Thiesen, R Hartensuer, C Surke, S Ochman, T Vordemvenne.   

Abstract

Although currently there are many different recommendations and strategies in the therapy of odontoid fractures in the elderly, there are still no generally accepted guidelines for a structured and standardised treatment. Moreover, the current opinion of spine surgeons regarding the optimal treatment of odontoid fractures Type II of the elderly is unknown. In order to have an objective insight into the diverging strategies for the management of Anderson Type II odontoid fractures and form a basis for future comparisons, this study investigated the current concepts and preferences of orthopaedic, neuro- and trauma surgeons. Spine surgeons from 34 medical schools and 8 hospitals in Germany, 4 university hospitals in Austria and 5 in Switzerland were invited to participate in an online survey using a 12-item 1-sided questionnaire. A total of 44 interviewees from 34 medical institutions participated in the survey, consisting of trauma (50%), orthopaedic (20.5%) and neurosurgeons (27.3%). Out of these, 70.5% treated 1-20 fractures per year; 63.6% favoured the anterior screw fixation as therapy for Type II odontoid fractures, the open posterior Magerl transarticular C1/C2 fusion, the posterior Harms C1/C2 fusion, and conservative immobilisation by cervical orthosis was preferred by 9.1% in each case. 59.1% preferred the anterior odontoid screw fixation as an appropriate treatment of Anderson Type II odontoid fractures in the elderly. 79.5% chose cervical orthosis for postsurgical treatment. Following operative treatment, nonunion rates were reported to be <10% and <20% by 40.9% and 70% of the surgeons, respectively. 56.8% reported changing from primary conservative to secondary operative treatment in <10% of cases. The most favoured technique in revision surgery of nonunions was the open posterior Magerl transarticular fusion technique, chosen by 38.6% of respondents. 18.2% preferred the posterior Harms C1/C2 fusion technique, 11.4% the percutaneous posterior Magerl technique and the anterior odontoid screw fixation in each case. This study discovered major variations in the treatment of Anderson Type II odontoid fractures in the elderly in terms of indication for conservative and operative treatment between several treatment centres in 3 European countries. Difficulty and complexity in formulating general guidelines based on multicenter studies is conceivable.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22001503     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.09.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  6 in total

1.  A biomechanical comparison of a cement-augmented odontoid screw with a posterior-instrumented fusion in geriatric patients with an odontoid fracture type IIb.

Authors:  Falko Schwarz; Christian Liebsch; Nikolaus Berger-Roscher; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Yasser Sakr; Rolf Kalff; Albrecht Waschke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Anterior management of C2 fractures using miniplate fixation: outcome, function and quality of life in a case series of 15 patients.

Authors:  Axel Franke; Dan Bieler; Rebecca Wern; Tim Trotzke; Sebastian Hentsch; Erwin Kollig
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Cement-augmented anterior odontoid screw fixation for osteoporotic type II odontoid fractures in elderly patients: prospective evaluation of 11 patients.

Authors:  Albrecht Waschke; Bernhard Ullrich; Rolf Kalff; Falko Schwarz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Cervical spine fractures in the elderly: morbidity and mortality after operative treatment.

Authors:  A L Sander; A El Saman; P Delfosse; S Wutzler; S Meier; I Marzi; H Laurer
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.693

5.  Development and first application testing of a new protocol for CT-based stability evaluation of the injured upper cervical spine.

Authors:  Matthias K Jung; Lukas Hörnig; Michael M A Stübs; Paul A Grützner; Michael Kreinest
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 6.  Systematic review on surgical and nonsurgical treatment of type II odontoid fractures in the elderly.

Authors:  Yohan Robinson; Anna-Lena Robinson; Claes Olerud
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.