Literature DB >> 22001236

Flanking nucleotide specificity for DNA mismatch repair-deficient frameshifts within activin receptor 2 (ACVR2).

Heekyung Chung1, Joy Chaudhry, Jenny F Lai, Dennis J Young, John M Carethers.   

Abstract

We previously demonstrated that exonic selectivity for frameshift mutation (exon 10 over exon 3) of ACVR2 in mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient cells is partially determined by 6 nucleotides flanking 5' and 3' of each microsatellite. Substitution of flanking nucleotides surrounding the exon 10 microsatellite with those surrounding the exon 3 microsatellite greatly diminished heteroduplex (A(7)/T(8)) and full (A(7)/T(7)) mutation, while substitution of flanking nucleotides from exon 3 with those from exon 10 enhanced frameshift mutation. We hypothesized that specific individual nucleotide(s) within these flanking sequences control ACVR2 frameshift mutation rates. Only the 3rd nucleotide 5' of the microsatellite, and 3rd, 4th, and 5th nucleotides 3' of the microsatellite were altered from the native flanking sequences and these locations were individually altered (sites A, B, C, and D, respectively). Constructs were cloned +1bp out-of-frame of EGFP, allowing a -1bp frameshift to express EGFP. Plasmids were stably transfected into MMR-deficient cells. Non-fluorescent cells were sorted, cultured for 35 days, and harvested for flow cytometry and DNA-sequencing. Site A (C to T) and B (G to C) in ACVR2 exon 10 decreased both heteroduplex and full mutant as much as the construct containing all 4 alterations. For ACVR2 exon 3, site A (T to C), C (A to G), and D (G to C) are responsible for increased heteroduplex formation, whereas site D is responsible for full mutant formation by ACVR2 exon 10 flanking sequences. Exonic selectivity for frameshift mutation within ACVR2's sequence context is specifically controlled by individual nucleotides flanking each microsatellite.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22001236      PMCID: PMC3237829          DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2011.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  25 in total

1.  Both microsatellite length and sequence context determine frameshift mutation rates in defective DNA mismatch repair.

Authors:  Heekyung Chung; Claudia G Lopez; Joy Holmstrom; Dennis J Young; Jenny F Lai; Deena Ream-Robinson; John M Carethers
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 6.150

2.  Frameshift mutator mutations.

Authors:  S Malkhosyan; N Rampino; H Yamamoto; M Perucho
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-08-08       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Microsatellite instability in the insulin-like growth factor II receptor gene in gastrointestinal tumours.

Authors:  R F Souza; R Appel; J Yin; S Wang; K N Smolinski; J M Abraham; T T Zou; Y Q Shi; J Lei; J Cottrell; K Cymes; K Biden; L Simms; B Leggett; P M Lynch; M Frazier; S M Powell; N Harpaz; H Sugimura; J Young; S J Meltzer
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  hMSH2 forms specific mispair-binding complexes with hMSH3 and hMSH6.

Authors:  S Acharya; T Wilson; S Gradia; M F Kane; S Guerrette; G T Marsischky; R Kolodner; R Fishel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-11-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Instabilotyping: comprehensive identification of frameshift mutations caused by coding region microsatellite instability.

Authors:  Y Mori; J Yin; A Rashid; B A Leggett; J Young; L Simms; P M Kuehl; P Langenberg; S J Meltzer; O C Stine
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Somatic frameshift mutations in the BAX gene in colon cancers of the microsatellite mutator phenotype.

Authors:  N Rampino; H Yamamoto; Y Ionov; Y Li; H Sawai; J C Reed; M Perucho
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-02-14       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Microsatellite instability in cancer of the proximal colon.

Authors:  S N Thibodeau; G Bren; D Schaid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-05-07       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  There is no increase in frequency of somatic mutations in metastases compared with primary colorectal carcinomas with microsatellite instability.

Authors:  Rebecca Barnetson; Robert Eckstein; Bruce Robinson; Margaret Schnitzler
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.006

9.  The human mutator gene homolog MSH2 and its association with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer.

Authors:  R Fishel; M K Lescoe; M R Rao; N G Copeland; N A Jenkins; J Garber; M Kane; R Kolodner
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1993-12-03       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 10.  Genomic and epigenetic instability in colorectal cancer pathogenesis.

Authors:  William M Grady; John M Carethers
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  6 in total

1.  Microsatellite Instability Pathway and EMAST in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  John M Carethers
Journal:  Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep       Date:  2017-02-02

Review 2.  EMAST is a Form of Microsatellite Instability That is Initiated by Inflammation and Modulates Colorectal Cancer Progression.

Authors:  John M Carethers; Minoru Koi; Stephanie S Tseng-Rogenski
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 4.096

3.  A new method for discovering EMAST sequences in animal models of cancer.

Authors:  Nitya Bhaskaran; Jennifer Luu; Scott T Kelley; Mohammad W Khan; Priyadarshini Mamindla; Kathleen L McGuire
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Tetranucleotide Microsatellite Mutational Behavior Assessed in Real Time: Implications for Future Microsatellite Panels.

Authors:  Maide Ö Raeker; Jovan Pierre-Charles; John M Carethers
Journal:  Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-01-23

5.  Production of truncated MBD4 protein by frameshift mutation in DNA mismatch repair-deficient cells enhances 5-fluorouracil sensitivity that is independent of hMLH1 status.

Authors:  Satoshi Suzuki; Moriya Iwaizumi; Stephanie Tseng-Rogenski; Yasushi Hamaya; Hiroaki Miyajima; Shigeru Kanaoka; Ken Sugimoto; John M Carethers
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 4.742

6.  Oxidative stress induces nuclear-to-cytosol shift of hMSH3, a potential mechanism for EMAST in colorectal cancer cells.

Authors:  Stephanie S Tseng-Rogenski; Heekyung Chung; Maike B Wilk; Shuai Zhang; Moriya Iwaizumi; John M Carethers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.