Literature DB >> 20418486

Both microsatellite length and sequence context determine frameshift mutation rates in defective DNA mismatch repair.

Heekyung Chung1, Claudia G Lopez, Joy Holmstrom, Dennis J Young, Jenny F Lai, Deena Ream-Robinson, John M Carethers.   

Abstract

It is generally accepted that longer microsatellites mutate more frequently in defective DNA mismatch repair (MMR) than shorter microsatellites. Indeed, we have previously observed that the A10 microsatellite of transforming growth factor beta type II receptor (TGFBR2) frameshifts -1 bp at a faster rate than the A8 microsatellite of activin type II receptor (ACVR2), although both genes become frameshift-mutated in >80% of MMR-defective colorectal cancers. To experimentally determine the effect of microsatellite length upon frameshift mutation in gene-specific sequence contexts, we altered the microsatellite length within TGFBR2 exon 3 and ACVR2 exon 10, generating A7, A10 and A13 constructs. These constructs were cloned 1 bp out of frame of EGFP, allowing a -1 bp frameshift to drive EGFP expression, and stably transfected into MMR-deficient cells. Subsequent non-fluorescent cells were sorted, cultured for 7-35 days and harvested for EGFP analysis and DNA sequencing. Longer microsatellites within TGFBR2 and ACVR2 showed significantly higher mutation rates than shorter ones, with TGFBR2 A13, A10 and A7 frameshifts measured at 22.38x10(-4), 2.17x10(-4) and 0.13x10(-4), respectively. Surprisingly, shorter ACVR2 constructs showed three times higher mutation rates at A7 and A10 lengths than identical length TGFBR2 constructs but comparably lower at the A13 length, suggesting influences from both microsatellite length as well as the sequence context. Furthermore, the TGFBR2 A13 construct mutated into 33% A11 sequences (-2 bp) in addition to expected A12 (-1 bp), indicating that this construct undergoes continual subsequent frameshift mutation. These data demonstrate experimentally that both the length of a mononucleotide microsatellite and its sequence context influence mutation rate in defective DNA MMR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20418486      PMCID: PMC2912546          DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddq151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mol Genet        ISSN: 0964-6906            Impact factor:   6.150


  22 in total

1.  Slippage synthesis of simple sequence DNA.

Authors:  C Schlötterer; D Tautz
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1992-01-25       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Relative rates of insertion and deletion mutations in dinucleotide repeats of various lengths in mismatch repair proficient mouse and mismatch repair deficient human cells.

Authors:  Nazumi A Yamada; Gwynedd A Smith; Anay Castro; Carmen N Roques; Jayne C Boyer; Rosann A Farber
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2002-02-20       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  Microsatellite instability in yeast: dependence on the length of the microsatellite.

Authors:  M Wierdl; M Dominska; T D Petes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Instabilotyping: comprehensive identification of frameshift mutations caused by coding region microsatellite instability.

Authors:  Y Mori; J Yin; A Rashid; B A Leggett; J Young; L Simms; P M Kuehl; P Langenberg; S J Meltzer; O C Stine
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Somatic frameshift mutations in the BAX gene in colon cancers of the microsatellite mutator phenotype.

Authors:  N Rampino; H Yamamoto; Y Ionov; Y Li; H Sawai; J C Reed; M Perucho
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-02-14       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Sequence composition and context effects on the generation and repair of frameshift intermediates in mononucleotide runs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  B D Harfe; S Jinks-Robertson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Microsatellite instability in yeast: dependence on repeat unit size and DNA mismatch repair genes.

Authors:  E A Sia; R J Kokoska; M Dominska; P Greenwell; T D Petes
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Microsatellite instability in cancer of the proximal colon.

Authors:  S N Thibodeau; G Bren; D Schaid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-05-07       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  Genomic and epigenetic instability in colorectal cancer pathogenesis.

Authors:  William M Grady; John M Carethers
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Genetic instability within monotonous runs of CpG sequences in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  M Bichara; S Schumacher; R P Fuchs
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  11 in total

1.  GRG Profiles: John M. Carethers.

Authors:  John M Carethers
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Flanking nucleotide specificity for DNA mismatch repair-deficient frameshifts within activin receptor 2 (ACVR2).

Authors:  Heekyung Chung; Joy Chaudhry; Jenny F Lai; Dennis J Young; John M Carethers
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  HEREDITARY, SPORADIC AND METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER ARE COMMONLY DRIVEN BY SPECIFIC SPECTRUMS OF DEFECTIVE DNA MISMATCH REPAIR COMPONENTS.

Authors:  John M Carethers
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2016

4.  Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer: from molecular oncogenic mechanisms to clinical implications.

Authors:  Aziz Zaanan; Katy Meunier; Fatiha Sangar; Jean-François Fléjou; Françoise Praz
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 6.730

5.  Microsatellite Instability Pathway and EMAST in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  John M Carethers
Journal:  Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep       Date:  2017-02-02

6.  Immunological Features with DNA Microsatellite Alterations in Patients with Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Maide O Raeker; John M Carethers
Journal:  J Cancer Immunol (Wilmington)       Date:  2020

7.  Genotype-phenotype analysis of F-helix mutations at the kinase domain of TGFBR2, including a type 2 Marfan syndrome familial study.

Authors:  Lin Zhang; Ling-Gen Gao; Ming Zhang; Xian-Liang Zhou
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 2.367

Review 8.  EMAST is a Form of Microsatellite Instability That is Initiated by Inflammation and Modulates Colorectal Cancer Progression.

Authors:  John M Carethers; Minoru Koi; Stephanie S Tseng-Rogenski
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 4.096

9.  Production of truncated MBD4 protein by frameshift mutation in DNA mismatch repair-deficient cells enhances 5-fluorouracil sensitivity that is independent of hMLH1 status.

Authors:  Satoshi Suzuki; Moriya Iwaizumi; Stephanie Tseng-Rogenski; Yasushi Hamaya; Hiroaki Miyajima; Shigeru Kanaoka; Ken Sugimoto; John M Carethers
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 4.742

10.  Oxidative stress induces nuclear-to-cytosol shift of hMSH3, a potential mechanism for EMAST in colorectal cancer cells.

Authors:  Stephanie S Tseng-Rogenski; Heekyung Chung; Maike B Wilk; Shuai Zhang; Moriya Iwaizumi; John M Carethers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.