Literature DB >> 22000810

The efficacy and safety of panitumumab administered concomitantly with FOLFIRI or Irinotecan in second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: the secondary analysis from STEPP (Skin Toxicity Evaluation Protocol With Panitumumab) by KRAS status.

Edith P Mitchell1, Bilal Piperdi, Mario E Lacouture, Heather Shearer, Nicholas Iannotti, Madhavan V Pillai, Feng Xu, Mohamed Yassine.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Panitumumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), is used as monotherapy for chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in patients with wild-type (WT) KRAS tumors. Although skin toxicities are the most common adverse events associated with EGFR inhibitors, the differences in efficacy and safety between pre-emptive and reactive skin treatment according to KRAS tumor status has not been reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had mCRC with disease progression or unacceptable toxicity with first-line treatment containing fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy ± bevacizumab. Patients were randomized 1:1 to pre-emptive or reactive skin treatment (after skin toxicity developed). Patients received either panitumumab 6 mg/kg + FOLFIRI every 2 weeks or panitumumab 9 mg/kg + irinotecan every 3 weeks. Key study endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), and safety according to KRAS tumor status.
RESULTS: Eighty-seven (92%) of 95 enrolled patients had evaluable KRAS tumor status: 49 (56%) patients with WT and 38 (44%) patients with mutant (MT) KRAS tumors, respectively. The ORR was 16% and 8% for patients with WT and MT KRAS tumors, respectively. Median PFS was 5.5 and 3.3 months for patients with WT and MT KRAS tumors, respectively. The most commonly observed adverse events by KRAS tumor status included dermatitis acneiform and pruritus.
CONCLUSION: Panitumumab in combination with irinotecan-based chemotherapy has an acceptable toxicity profile in second-line therapy for mCRC. Numerical differences trending in favor of the patients with WT KRAS tumors were observed for most efficacy endpoints.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22000810     DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2011.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer        ISSN: 1533-0028            Impact factor:   4.481


  16 in total

Review 1.  Panitumumab in the management of patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Christopher M Hocking; Timothy J Price
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.409

2.  Relationships between KRAS mutation status and baseline radiographic distribution of disease in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Michael H Rosenthal; Kyung Won Kim; Charles S Fuchs; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Nikhil H Ramaiya
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2014-12

3.  Combining bevacizumab and panitumumab with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Hong-Liang Liang; Ai-Ping Hu; Sen-Lin Li; Ji-Yong Liu
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-05-03       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Safety and efficacy of second-line treatment with folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in combination of panitumumab and bevacizumab for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Song Xie; Guoping Han; Zhikun Fan; Lifeng He; Wenbing Xu; Zhen Qin
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 5.  Irinotecan chemotherapy combined with fluoropyrimidines versus irinotecan alone for overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with advanced and/or metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Wahyu Wulaningsih; Ardyan Wardhana; Johnathan Watkins; Naomi Yoshuantari; Dimitra Repana; Mieke Van Hemelrijck
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-02-12

6.  A randomized Phase II clinical study of combining panitumumab and bevacizumab, plus irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) compared with FOLFIRI alone as second-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and KRAS mutation.

Authors:  Yuguo Liu; Lijuan Luan; Xingli Wang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Impact of tumour RAS/BRAF status in a first-line study of panitumumab + FOLFIRI in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Meinolf Karthaus; Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz; Laurent Mineur; Henry Letocha; Richard Greil; Josef Thaler; Eva Fernebro; Kelly S Oliner; Michael Boedigheimer; Brian Twomey; Ying Zhang; Gaston Demonty; Claus-Henning Köhne
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Targeted therapies in colorectal cancer-an integrative view by PPPM.

Authors:  Suzanne Hagan; Maria C M Orr; Brendan Doyle
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 6.543

9.  The efficacy and safety of panitumumab in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis from five randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ruo-feng Liang; Lei-lei Zheng
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 4.162

Review 10.  Effectiveness and safety of monoclonal antibodies for metastatic colorectal cancer treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bruno Rosa; Jose Paulo de Jesus; Eduardo L de Mello; Daniel Cesar; Mauro M Correia
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2015-10-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.