OBJECTIVES: Oral contraceptive pills suppress the hypothalomo-pituitary axis, which can affect the ultrasound and endocrine markers used to examine ovarian reserve. The objective of this study was to quantify the ultrasound and endocrine markers of functional ovarian reserve in women using a combined oral contraceptive pill (COCP) for more than a year. METHODS: This was a prospective case-control study involving healthy volunteers: 34 women using for more than a year a COCP with hormone-free interval (HFI) were compared to 36 normo-ovulatory, age-matched controls who had not used hormonal contraception within the last year. Volunteers using a COCP underwent a 3D ultrasound examination and had a blood sample taken within the first 4 days of active pill ingestion and those in the control group had the scan and blood test in the early follicular phase (days 2-5) of menstrual cycle. The main outcome measure was the difference in antral follicle counts stratified according to size and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH) and estradiol (E2) levels. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the number of small antral follicles measuring 2-6 mm. The COCP group had significantly fewer antral follicles measuring ≥ 6 mm (P < 0.001) and had significantly smaller ovaries (P < 0.001), which also had lower vascular indices than the control group (P < 0.05). While serum FSH, LH and E2 levels were significantly lower in the COCP group (P < 0.05), there was no significant difference in serum AMH levels between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged use of COCP suppressed pituitary gonadotropins and antral follicle development beyond 6 mm, but had no effect on levels of serum AMH and number of small antral follicles.
OBJECTIVES: Oral contraceptive pills suppress the hypothalomo-pituitary axis, which can affect the ultrasound and endocrine markers used to examine ovarian reserve. The objective of this study was to quantify the ultrasound and endocrine markers of functional ovarian reserve in women using a combined oral contraceptive pill (COCP) for more than a year. METHODS: This was a prospective case-control study involving healthy volunteers: 34 women using for more than a year a COCP with hormone-free interval (HFI) were compared to 36 normo-ovulatory, age-matched controls who had not used hormonal contraception within the last year. Volunteers using a COCP underwent a 3D ultrasound examination and had a blood sample taken within the first 4 days of active pill ingestion and those in the control group had the scan and blood test in the early follicular phase (days 2-5) of menstrual cycle. The main outcome measure was the difference in antral follicle counts stratified according to size and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH) and estradiol (E2) levels. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the number of small antral follicles measuring 2-6 mm. The COCP group had significantly fewer antral follicles measuring ≥ 6 mm (P < 0.001) and had significantly smaller ovaries (P < 0.001), which also had lower vascular indices than the control group (P < 0.05). While serum FSH, LH and E2 levels were significantly lower in the COCP group (P < 0.05), there was no significant difference in serum AMH levels between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged use of COCP suppressed pituitary gonadotropins and antral follicle development beyond 6 mm, but had no effect on levels of serum AMH and number of small antral follicles.
Authors: Rebecca Scherzer; Peter Bacchetti; Geralyn Messerlian; Johanna Goderre; Pauline M Maki; David B Seifer; Kathryn Anastos; Roksana Karim; Ruth M Greenblatt Journal: Am J Reprod Immunol Date: 2014-10-23 Impact factor: 3.886
Authors: Seungyoun Jung; Naomi Allen; Alan A Arslan; Laura Baglietto; Louise A Brinton; Brian L Egleston; Roni Falk; Renée T Fortner; Kathy J Helzlsouer; Annika Idahl; Rudolph Kaaks; Eva Lundin; Melissa Merritt; Charlotte Onland-Moret; Sabina Rinaldi; María-José Sánchez; Sabina Sieri; Helena Schock; Xiao-Ou Shu; Patrick M Sluss; Paul N Staats; Ruth C Travis; Anne Tjønneland; Antonia Trichopoulou; Shelley Tworoger; Kala Visvanathan; Vittorio Krogh; Elisabete Weiderpass; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Wei Zheng; Joanne F Dorgan Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Erum Azhar; David B Seifer; Katherine Melzer; Ahmed Ahmed; Jeremy Weedon; Howard Minkoff Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2015-01-18 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Anne-Marie Charpentier; Amy Lee Chong; Genevieve Gingras-Hill; Sameera Ahmed; Candemir Cigsar; Abha A Gupta; Ellen Greenblatt; David C Hodgson Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Lauren N C Johnson; Mary D Sammel; Katherine E Dillon; Lara Lechtenberg; Allison Schanne; Clarisa R Gracia Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2014-06-14 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Maria E Bleil; Joyce T Bromberger; Melissa D Latham; Nancy E Adler; Lauri A Pasch; Steven E Gregorich; Mitchell P Rosen; Marcelle I Cedars Journal: Menopause Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Maria E Bleil; Steven E Gregorich; Daniel McConnell; Mitchell P Rosen; Marcelle I Cedars Journal: Menopause Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Heidi Vanden Brink; Amy D Willis; Brittany Y Jarrett; Annie W Lin; Steven Soler; Siân Best; Erica L Bender; Andrew K Peppin; Kathleen M Hoeger; Marla E Lujan Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2016-01-27 Impact factor: 7.329