BACKGROUND: Severe social withdrawal (called hikikomori, and defined as isolation lasting more than six months and not due to an apparent mental disorder) has drawn increasing public attention in Japan. It is unclear whether hikikomori is merely a symptom or syndrome of social withdrawal. AIM: To evaluate this phenomenon in relationship to social anxiety disorder (SAD), as few previous studies have. METHODS: One hundred and forty-one consecutive patients with SAD diagnosed according to DSM-IV criteria by a semi-structured interview were treated with a combination of psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy and group activity. RESULTS: Twenty-seven (19%) SAD patients fulfilled the criteria for hikikomori, and these patients had earlier onset, more symptoms and less education than non-hikikomori SAD patients. Only 33% of hikikomori SAD patients spontaneously complained of SAD symptoms at first visit. There were no diagnostic differences between hikikomori and non-hikikomori SAD patients, except that comorbid obsessive-compulsive disorder was more frequent in hikikomori SAD patients. Functional impairment in 10 (37%) hikikomori SAD patients improved after several years of combination therapy. CONCLUSION: Hikikomori may serve as a proxy for a severe form of SAD. Patients with comorbid SAD and hikikomori have lower treatment response rates than those with SAD alone.
BACKGROUND: Severe social withdrawal (called hikikomori, and defined as isolation lasting more than six months and not due to an apparent mental disorder) has drawn increasing public attention in Japan. It is unclear whether hikikomori is merely a symptom or syndrome of social withdrawal. AIM: To evaluate this phenomenon in relationship to social anxiety disorder (SAD), as few previous studies have. METHODS: One hundred and forty-one consecutive patients with SAD diagnosed according to DSM-IV criteria by a semi-structured interview were treated with a combination of psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy and group activity. RESULTS: Twenty-seven (19%) SADpatients fulfilled the criteria for hikikomori, and these patients had earlier onset, more symptoms and less education than non-hikikomori SADpatients. Only 33% of hikikomori SADpatients spontaneously complained of SAD symptoms at first visit. There were no diagnostic differences between hikikomori and non-hikikomori SADpatients, except that comorbid obsessive-compulsive disorder was more frequent in hikikomori SADpatients. Functional impairment in 10 (37%) hikikomori SADpatients improved after several years of combination therapy. CONCLUSION: Hikikomori may serve as a proxy for a severe form of SAD. Patients with comorbid SAD and hikikomori have lower treatment response rates than those with SAD alone.
Authors: Alan R Teo; Michael D Fetters; Kyle Stufflebam; Masaru Tateno; Yatan Balhara; Tae Young Choi; Shigenobu Kanba; Carol A Mathews; Takahiro A Kato Journal: Int J Soc Psychiatry Date: 2014-05-27
Authors: Alan Robert Teo; Kyle Whitaker Stufflebam; Francis Lu; Michael Derwin Fetters Journal: Asia Pac Psychiatry Date: 2014-11-26 Impact factor: 2.538
Authors: John W M Yuen; Yoyo K Y Yan; Victor C W Wong; Wilson W S Tam; Ka-Wing So; Wai-Tong Chien Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-02-11 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: John W M Yuen; Victor C W Wong; Wilson W S Tam; Ka Wing So; Wai Tong Chien Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-02-14 Impact factor: 3.390