Literature DB >> 21997474

[Scoring systems in intensive care medicine : principles, models, application and limits].

V Fleig1, F Brenck, M Wolff, M A Weigand.   

Abstract

Scoring systems are used in all diagnostic areas of medicine. Several parameters are evaluated and rated with points according to their value in order to simplify a complex clinical situation with a score. The application ranges from the classification of disease severity through determining the number of staff for the intensive care unit (ICU) to the evaluation of new therapies under study conditions. Since the introduction of scoring systems in the 1980's a variety of different score models has been developed. The scoring systems that are employed in intensive care and are discussed in this article can be categorized into prognostic scores, expenses scores and disease-specific scores. Since the introduction of compulsory recording of two scoring systems for accounting in the German diagnosis-related groups (DRG) system, these tools have gained more importance for all intensive care physicians. Problems remain in the valid calculation of scores and interpretation of the results.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21997474     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-011-1942-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  19 in total

1.  The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information.

Authors:  G A MILLER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1956-03       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Should the pre-sedation Glasgow Coma Scale value be used when calculating Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation scores for sedated patients? Scottish Intensive Care Society Audit Group.

Authors:  B M Livingston; S J Mackenzie; F N MacKirdy; J C Howie
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Assessing pain in critically ill sedated patients by using a behavioral pain scale.

Authors:  J F Payen; O Bru; J L Bosson; A Lagrasta; E Novel; I Deschaux; P Lavagne; C Jacquot
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Validation of a predictive rule for the management of community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  A Capelastegui; P P España; J M Quintana; I Areitio; I Gorordo; M Egurrola; A Bilbao
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 16.671

5.  APACHE-acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: a physiologically based classification system.

Authors:  W A Knaus; J E Zimmerman; D P Wagner; E A Draper; D E Lawrence
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Simplified Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System: the TISS-28 items--results from a multicenter study.

Authors:  D R Miranda; A de Rijk; W Schaufeli
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Improving risk adjustment in critically ill trauma patients: the TRISS-SAPS Score.

Authors:  Ana Reiter; Walter Mauritz; Barbara Jordan; Thomas Lang; Alexandra Pölzl; Linda Pelinka; Philipp G H Metnitz
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2004-08

8.  A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study.

Authors:  J R Le Gall; S Lemeshow; F Saulnier
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993 Dec 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  [The Mannheim peritonitis index. An instrument for the intraoperative prognosis of peritonitis].

Authors:  M M Linder; H Wacha; U Feldmann; G Wesch; R A Streifensand; E Gundlach
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 10.  Multiple organ dysfunction score: a reliable descriptor of a complex clinical outcome.

Authors:  J C Marshall; D J Cook; N V Christou; G R Bernard; C L Sprung; W J Sibbald
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  6 in total

1.  Standards of scoring, monitoring, and parameter targeting in German neurocritical care units: a national survey.

Authors:  C M Kowoll; C Dohmen; J Kahmann; R Dziewas; I Schirotzek; O W Sakowitz; J Bösel
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.210

2.  [Survey study: update on neurological intensive care in Germany 2012: structure, standards and scores in neurological intensive care units].

Authors:  J Bösel; C Kowoll; J Kahmann; R Dziewas; I Schirotzek; C Dohmen
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 3.  [Use of biomarkers in sepsis. Update and perspectives].

Authors:  B H Siegler; S Weiterer; C Lichtenstern; D Stumpp; T Brenner; S Hofer; M A Weigand; F Uhle
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Comparison of three different commercial PCR assays for the detection of pathogens in critically ill sepsis patients.

Authors:  J Schreiber; A Nierhaus; S A Braune; G de Heer; S Kluge
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 5.  Diagnostics, therapy and outcome prediction in abdominal sepsis: current standards and future perspectives.

Authors:  A Hecker; F Uhle; T Schwandner; W Padberg; M A Weigand
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-11-02       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Using a machine learning approach to predict mortality in critically ill influenza patients: a cross-sectional retrospective multicentre study in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chien-An Hu; Chia-Ming Chen; Yen-Chun Fang; Shinn-Jye Liang; Hao-Chien Wang; Wen-Feng Fang; Chau-Chyun Sheu; Wann-Cherng Perng; Kuang-Yao Yang; Kuo-Chin Kao; Chieh-Liang Wu; Chwei-Shyong Tsai; Ming-Yen Lin; Wen-Cheng Chao
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.