J Bösel1, C Kowoll, J Kahmann, R Dziewas, I Schirotzek, C Dohmen. 1. Neurologische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Deutschland. julian.boesel@med.uni-heidelberg.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neurological critical care lacks high-quality evidence to guide optimal treatment. Furthermore, it is presently rather unclear as to what extent German neurological intensivists adhere to guidelines, employ standard operating procedures or use scoring tools. METHODS: An e-mail-based questionnaire was distributed to physicians directing German neurological, neurosurgical and neurological/neurosurgical interdisciplinary intensive care units (ICUs). RESULTS: Of the 326 departments 78 answered the questionnaire and of these 53% were university units. The ICUs were either led by neurologists (37%), neurosurgeons (22%), anesthetists (28%) or a combination of these (13%). The mean number of ICU beds was 11.2 and the mean number of intensivists 7.7. Guideline adherence was stated to amount to 75 % by 41 % of the ICUs. Applications of standard procedures was achieved by more than 80 % for several ICU management aspects, while only 5 out of 19 of the respondents routinely used scoring tools in > 60% of the ICUs. The extent of protocol and score applications differed significantly according to hospital status or leading speciality. CONCLUSION: This survey suggests an obvious interest in but also an unfulfilled need of guidance in a standardized approach to neurological critical care in Germany. More activity in multicentre clinical research with a neurocritical focus to provide optimization of protocols, scores and guidelines appears to be warranted.
BACKGROUND: Neurological critical care lacks high-quality evidence to guide optimal treatment. Furthermore, it is presently rather unclear as to what extent German neurological intensivists adhere to guidelines, employ standard operating procedures or use scoring tools. METHODS: An e-mail-based questionnaire was distributed to physicians directing German neurological, neurosurgical and neurological/neurosurgical interdisciplinary intensive care units (ICUs). RESULTS: Of the 326 departments 78 answered the questionnaire and of these 53% were university units. The ICUs were either led by neurologists (37%), neurosurgeons (22%), anesthetists (28%) or a combination of these (13%). The mean number of ICU beds was 11.2 and the mean number of intensivists 7.7. Guideline adherence was stated to amount to 75 % by 41 % of the ICUs. Applications of standard procedures was achieved by more than 80 % for several ICU management aspects, while only 5 out of 19 of the respondents routinely used scoring tools in > 60% of the ICUs. The extent of protocol and score applications differed significantly according to hospital status or leading speciality. CONCLUSION: This survey suggests an obvious interest in but also an unfulfilled need of guidance in a standardized approach to neurological critical care in Germany. More activity in multicentre clinical research with a neurocritical focus to provide optimization of protocols, scores and guidelines appears to be warranted.
Authors: D Steffling; M Ritzka; W Jakob; A Steinbrecher; S Schwab-Malek; B Kaiser; P Hau; S Boy; K Fuchs; U Bogdahn; F Schlachetzki Journal: Nervenarzt Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 1.214
Authors: E W Ely; S K Inouye; G R Bernard; S Gordon; J Francis; L May; B Truman; T Speroff; S Gautam; R Margolin; R P Hart; R Dittus Journal: JAMA Date: 2001-12-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Gordon S Doig; Philippa T Heighes; Fiona Simpson; Elizabeth A Sweetman; Andrew R Davies Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2009-09-24 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Stefan A Dupont; Eelco F M Wijdicks; Edward M Manno; Giuseppe Lanzino; Alejandro A Rabinstein Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2009-07-30 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Jens Witsch; Bob Siegerink; Christian H Nolte; Maximilian Sprügel; Thorsten Steiner; Matthias Endres; Hagen B Huttner Journal: Neurol Res Pract Date: 2021-05-03