| Literature DB >> 21994636 |
Abinash Padhi1, Howard Ross, Julie Terwee, Sue Vandewoude, Mary Poss.
Abstract
CD4 decline is a hallmark of disease onset in individuals infected with Feline Immunodeficiency Virus (FIV) or Human Immunodeficiency Virus type 1 (HIV-1). Cats that are infected with a poorly replicating, apathogenic FIV (PLV) prior to exposure to a virulent FIV strain (FIVC) maintain CD4 numbers by mechanisms that are not correlated with a measurable adaptive immune response or reduction in circulating viral load. We employed population genetic approaches based on the 3' portion of the viral genome to estimate the population structure of FIVC from single and dual infected cats. In dual infected cats, FIVC effective population size was decreased during the initial viral expansion phase, and after three weeks of infection, the population declined sharply. The FIVC population recovered to pre-bottleneck levels approximately seven weeks post-FIVC infection. However, the population emerging from the bottleneck in dual infected cats was distinct based on estimates of temporal population structure and substitution profiles. The transition to transversion rate ratio (κ) increased from early to late phases in dual infected cats due primarily to a decrease in transversions whereas in single infected cats, κ declined over time. Although one clone with extensive G to A substitutions, indicative of host cytidine deaminase editing, was recovered from a dual infected cat during the bottleneck, the post bottleneck population had an overall reduction in G to A substitutions. These data are consistent with a model of PLV-induced host restriction, putatively involving host DNA editing, that alters the dynamics of FIVC throughout the course of infection leading to disease attenuation.Entities:
Keywords: Lentivirus; dual infection; genetic bottleneck; mutation rate; population genetics; viral temporal dynamics
Year: 2010 PMID: 21994636 PMCID: PMC3185597 DOI: 10.3390/v2122663
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Viruses ISSN: 1999-4915 Impact factor: 5.048
Mutation rates of FIV genome in single and dual infected cats.
| Single | Strict | 10.60 (9.23–12.5) | N.A |
| Relaxed | 4.60 (4.21–5.00) | 0.866 (0.698–1.057) | |
| Dual | Strict | 11.3 (9.87–12.9) | N.A |
| Relaxed | 6.94 (5.27–8.12) | 0.884 (0.681–1.116) |
Estimates are based on the HKY model with uncorrelated log-normal distribution (UCLD) and Time to the Most Recent Common Ancestor (TMRCA) was constrained (90 days);
CoV: Coefficient of Variation. N.A: Not applicable.
Figure 1FIVC genomic diversity in dual and single infection. Bayesian skyline plot depicting dynamics of FIVC effective population size in single (grey) and dual (black) infections. Thick lines indicate median values and dotted lines indicate 95% confident intervals. The time scales are referenced to the day of PLV infection, and to the day of FIVC infection, which occurred 28 days after cats were infected with PLV. Shading highlights severe constriction of effective population size, indicative of a population bottleneck.
Analyses of Molecular Variance (AMOVA) showing the hierarchical genetic partitioning in FIV from single and dual infections.
| Among groups | 1 | 11.208 | −0.01690 Va | −0.14 | FCT: −0.00175 |
| Among populations within groups | 2 | 24.364 | 0.08847 Vb | 0.92 | |
| Within populations | 114 | 1092.68 | 9.58492 Vc | 99.26 | |
| Total | 117 | 1128.25 | 9.65649 |
The data was partitioned into four temporally-spaced populations: single early (SE), single late (SL), dual early (DE) and dual late (DL). Single group include SE and SL, and dual group include DE and DL; Va, Vb, and Vc are the associate covariance components. FCT, FST, and FSC are the F-statistics;
Significant values at P < 0.001 after 10,000 permutations.
Figure 2Clustering of FIVC from dual and single infections. FST-based neighbor joining tree showing the relationships among the temporally-spaced infection groups. Branch lengths are shown at the base of the respective nodes.
Transition and transversion rate ratio (kappa, k) for ui, vif, and env genes at early and late time point of single and dual infection groups.
| Kappa (k = Ts/Tv) | Early | Late | Early | Late | Early | Late |
| Single | 17.1712 | 10.2651 | 9.0782 | 7.88854 | 14.8736 | 7.88854 |
| Dual | 8.868 | 20.1281 | 10.2285 | 33.0202 | 13.6558 | 26.5212 |
Horizontal dark grey shading shows the trend from early to late for each gene of the respective infection group. The vertical light grey shading shows the trend in late phase.
Figure 3Nucleotide substitution frequency in a hypermutated clone from a dual infected cat. (A) Plot of percentage A versus G for all clones in all the four groups. The outlier clone, dF96B68_d45, is identified in the upper left quadrant. (B) Specific mutations noted in the hypermutated clone relative to parental virus. Inset indicates non-G to A transitions on an expanded scale.
Figure 4Percentage of substitutions in early and late populations in FIVC sequences from single and dual infections. (A) Percentage of total substitutions in each gene that are G to A substitutions. Dual late FIVC genomes have the lowest percentage of G to A substitutions. (B) Percentage of total substitutions in each gene that are each possible transversion. The di-nucleotide symbol indicates that the first nucleotide is replaced by the second, e.g., GT indicates a G to T substitution. Data are shown for three genes; ui is the 3′ end of the pol gene encoding dUTPase and integrase.
Figure 5Schematic model of the dynamics of FIVC in single and dual infection. Key elements of FIVC infection dynamics in dual infected cats are indicated with letters. A: Initial infection of 10 cats with PLV or sham inoculated. B: (28 days post PLV infection); Infection of five cats in each group with FIVC (4 groups total). C: Peak effective population size one week after FIVC infection. D: Population bottleneck between week 3–7 in dual infected cats. E: FIVC recovery from bottleneck. The black and grey lines represent changes in FIVC effective population size from dual and single infected cats, respectively. The circles along the lines are proportional to FIVC population size in PBMC and circles adjacent to the line represent hypothetical dynamics of virus infection in peripheral tissues. The number and color of dots in each tissue ‘circle’ represent genetic diversity in each FIVC population. Possible mechanisms for the bottleneck related to changes in infected cell dynamics include decreased immigration of infected cells from peripheral tissues to blood (dashed arrow) or increased emigration from peripheral blood to tissues (bold arrow). The recovered population (E) in dual infected cats has unique substitution features (see text) suggesting that the majority of infected cells sampled in peripheral blood might be coming from a tissue compartment or cell type not represented in the pre-bottleneck sample (indicated by the curved arrows). An alternative explanation is that the recovered population derives from a genetically impoverished population depicted at D that survived the bottleneck. The population size of FIVC in single infection is stable throughout this period (C–E).