Literature DB >> 2199444

The fidelity of DNA synthesis catalyzed by derivatives of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I.

K Bebenek1, C M Joyce, M P Fitzgerald, T A Kunkel.   

Abstract

The fidelity of DNA synthesis by an exonuclease-proficient DNA polymerase results from the selectivity of the polymerization reaction and from exonucleolytic proofreading. We have examined the contribution of these two steps to the fidelity of DNA synthesis catalyzed by the large Klenow fragment of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I, using enzymes engineered by site-directed mutagenesis to inactivate the proofreading exonuclease. Measurements with two mutant Klenow polymerases lacking exonuclease activity but retaining normal polymerase activity and protein structure demonstrate that the base substitution fidelity of polymerization averages one error for each 10,000 to 40,000 bases polymerized, and can vary more than 30-fold depending on the mispair and its position. Steady-state enzyme kinetic measurements of selectivity at the initial insertion step by the exonuclease-deficient polymerase demonstrate differences in both the Km and the Vmax for incorrect versus correct nucleotides. Exonucleolytic proofreading by the wild-type enzyme improves the average base substitution fidelity by 4- to 7-fold, reflecting efficient proofreading of some mispairs and less efficient proofreading of others. The wild-type polymerase is highly accurate for -1 base frameshift errors, with an error rate of less than or equal to 10(-6). The exonuclease-deficient polymerase is less accurate, suggesting that proofreading also enhances frameshift fidelity. Even without a proofreading exonuclease, Klenow polymerase has high frameshift fidelity relative to several other DNA polymerases, including eucaryotic DNA polymerase-alpha, an exonuclease-deficient, 4-subunit complex whose catalytic subunit is almost three times larger. The Klenow polymerase has a large (46 kDa) domain containing the polymerase active site and a smaller (22 kDa) domain containing the active site for the 3'----5' exonuclease. Upon removal of the small domain, the large polymerase domain has altered base substitution error specificity when compared to the two-domain but exonuclease-deficient enzyme. It is also less accurate for -1 base errors at reiterated template nucleotides and for a 276-nucleotide deletion error. Thus, removal of a protein domain of a DNA polymerase can affect its fidelity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2199444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  64 in total

Review 1.  A biochemical mechanism for nonrandom mutations and evolution.

Authors:  B E Wright
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  The roles of Klenow processing and flap processing activities of DNA polymerase I in chromosome instability in Escherichia coli K12 strains.

Authors:  Yuki Nagata; Kazumi Mashimo; Masakado Kawata; Kazuo Yamamoto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Incoming nucleotide binds to Klenow ternary complex leading to stable physical sequestration of preceding dNTP on DNA.

Authors:  S Ramanathan; K V Chary; B J Rao
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Whole genome analysis of genetic alterations in small DNA samples using hyperbranched strand displacement amplification and array-CGH.

Authors:  José M Lage; John H Leamon; Tanja Pejovic; Stefan Hamann; Michelle Lacey; Deborah Dillon; Richard Segraves; Bettina Vossbrinck; Antonio González; Daniel Pinkel; Donna G Albertson; Jose Costa; Paul M Lizardi
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Processive DNA synthesis observed in a polymerase crystal suggests a mechanism for the prevention of frameshift mutations.

Authors:  Sean J Johnson; Jeffrey S Taylor; Lorena S Beese
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-03-20       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Kinetic analysis of the unique error signature of human DNA polymerase ν.

Authors:  Mercedes E Arana; Olga Potapova; Thomas A Kunkel; Catherine M Joyce
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  A unique error signature for human DNA polymerase nu.

Authors:  Mercedes E Arana; Kei-ichi Takata; Miguel Garcia-Diaz; Richard D Wood; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2006-11-21

8.  Role of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I in conferring viability upon the dnaN159 mutant strain.

Authors:  Robert W Maul; Laurie H Sanders; James B Lim; Rosemary Benitez; Mark D Sutton
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Evolving a polymerase for hydrophobic base analogues.

Authors:  David Loakes; José Gallego; Vitor B Pinheiro; Eric T Kool; Philipp Holliger
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Unequal fidelity of leading strand and lagging strand DNA replication on the Escherichia coli chromosome.

Authors:  I J Fijalkowska; P Jonczyk; M M Tkaczyk; M Bialoskorska; R M Schaaper
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-08-18       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.