Literature DB >> 21993928

Selective tissue elevation by pressure for endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal adenoma: first clinical trial.

S Belle1, P H Collet, M Szyrach, P Ströbel, S Post, M D Enderle, G Kähler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection of large lateral spreading tumors currently are technically limited by complications such as bleeding, perforation, and disturbed large procedural sites, leading to incomplete resection and secondary surgery. Further technical improvements are necessary. The authors previously demonstrated the effectiveness of a focused water jet for elevation of the lamina submucosa in animal studies. For the first time, the clinical application of selective tissue elevation by pressure (STEP) for the treatment of colorectal adenomas as a prospective single-arm human trial is presented.
METHODS: This trial evaluated 59 patients who had primary colorectal adenomas with diameters exceeding 12 mm classified as 0-IIa or 0-IIb according to Paris classification. A submucosal cushion was created with a flexible water jet applicator using the Helix HydroJet. The adenoma was subsequently resected with a mucosal resection snare. All results were recorded. The resected specimens were assessed histologically.
RESULTS: A total of 59 patients underwent resection of 70 lesions with a maximum diameter of 80 mm (mean, 27 mm). Submucosal elevation with the water jet dissector was possible in all cases and locations from the pectinate line to the ileocecal valve. Of the 70 lesions, 64 (91%) were resected completely in one session. Histologically, the resected specimens were found to be adenocarcinomas (n = 2, 3%), adenomas with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (n = 24, 34%), adenomas with low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (n = 38, 54%), and hyperplastic polyps (n = 6, 9%). Hemostasis during the resection was necessary in 24 cases (34%). No perforation required surgical intervention.
CONCLUSION: This first clinical trial to analyze STEP technique demonstrated that STEP used to elevate large mucosal lesions in any location is feasible and facilitates EMR for colorectal adenoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21993928     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1873-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  22 in total

1.  Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection in the West--too many concerns and caveats?

Authors:  H Neuhaus
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  Randomized controlled study of EMR versus endoscopic submucosal dissection with a water-jet hybrid-knife of esophageal lesions in a porcine model.

Authors:  Horst Neuhaus; Katja Wirths; Martin Schenk; Markus Dominik Enderle; Brigitte Schumacher
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 3.  Colonoscopy perforation rate, mechanisms and outcome: from diagnostic to therapeutic colonoscopy.

Authors:  V Panteris; J Haringsma; E J Kuipers
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 4.  [Anatomical and atypical liver resections].

Authors:  J Scheele
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Efficacy, safety and outcomes of 'inject and cut' endoscopic mucosal resection for large sessile and flat colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Francesco Ferrara; Carmelo Luigiano; Stefania Ghersi; Carlo Fabbri; Marco Bassi; Patrizia Landi; Anna Maria Polifemo; Paola Billi; Vincenzo Cennamo; Pierluigi Consolo; Angela Alibrandi; Nicola D'Imperio
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 3.216

6.  Efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection: a study of 101 cases.

Authors:  Nuzhat A Ahmad; Michael L Kochman; William B Long; Emma E Furth; Gregory G Ginsberg
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection.

Authors:  Yutaka Saito; Masakatsu Fukuzawa; Takahisa Matsuda; Shusei Fukunaga; Taku Sakamoto; Toshio Uraoka; Takeshi Nakajima; Hisatomo Ikehara; Kuang-I Fu; Takao Itoi; Takahiro Fujii
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Meta-analysis and systematic review of colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection.

Authors:  Srinivas R Puli; Yasuo Kakugawa; Takuji Gotoda; Daphne Antillon; Yutaka Saito; Mainor R Antillon
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Endoscopic mucosal resection of 161 cases of large sessile or flat colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Naila Arebi; David Swain; Noriko Suzuki; Chris Fraser; Ashley Price; Brian P Saunders
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  Selective tissue elevation by pressure injection (STEP) facilitates endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR).

Authors:  Georg F B A Kähler; Moritz S Sold; Stefan Post; Klaus Fischer; Markus D Enderle
Journal:  Surg Technol Int       Date:  2007
View more
  4 in total

1.  Recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection-therapy failure?

Authors:  S Belle; L Haase; L R Pilz; S Post; M Ebert; G Kaehler
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) in Colorectal Tumors.

Authors:  Franz Ludwig Dumoulin; Bernd Sido; Reinhard Bollmann; Malte Sauer
Journal:  Viszeralmedizin       Date:  2014-02

Review 3.  Improved Techniques for Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) in Colorectal Adenoma.

Authors:  Moritz Sold; Georg Kähler
Journal:  Viszeralmedizin       Date:  2014-02

4.  Management of colorectal laterally spreading tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pedro Russo; Sandra Barbeiro; Halim Awadie; Diogo Libânio; Mario Dinis-Ribeiro; Michael Bourke
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2019-01-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.