Literature DB >> 21993788

Sound-induced tympanal membrane motion in bushcrickets and its relationship to sensory output.

Jennifer Hummel1, Manfred Kössl, Manuela Nowotny.   

Abstract

In the auditory system of bushcrickets, sound can reach the receptors via two different paths: (i) by acting on the outside of the tympana situated on both sides of each foreleg or (ii) through the acoustic trachea that opens at a spiracle on the thorax. While the spiracle is considered to be the main point of sound entry for higher audio and ultrasonic frequencies, the role of the tympana is still unclear. The tympana border the air-filled acoustic trachea as well as the fluid-filled haemolymph channel containing the receptor organs. To understand their role during sound transduction, the sound-induced neuronal response of the hearing organ was recorded in combination with measurement of tympanal membrane motion using laser-Doppler vibrometry. For far-field stimulation, the frequency of the most sensitive hearing (∼16 kHz) matched the frequency of a pronounced maximum of tympanal membrane vibration. A second maximum of tympanum motion at lower frequencies (∼7 kHz) was correlated with an increased nerve activity at higher intensities (>70 dB sound pressure level, SPL). These correlations support the hypothesis of functional coupling between tympanum motion and nerve activity. When sound stimuli were applied locally, through either the tympanum or the spiracle, significant differences between tympanum motion and nerve activity were found. These discrepancies show that tympanum motion and neuronal response are not coupled directly and that there is no linear relationship with the applied SPL. Taken together, these data verify a functional, albeit indirect, coupling of tympanum motion and sensory cell activity for one of the pronounced vibration maxima, which appears to represent a resonance frequency of the tympanum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21993788     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.054445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  8 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanics of hearing in katydids.

Authors:  Fernando Montealegre-Z; Daniel Robert
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Processing of simple and complex acoustic signals in a tonotopically organized ear.

Authors:  Jennifer Hummel; Konstantin Wolf; Manfred Kössl; Manuela Nowotny
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Gating of Acoustic Transducer Channels Is Shaped by Biomechanical Filter Processes.

Authors:  Jennifer Hummel; Stefan Schöneich; Manfred Kössl; Jan Scherberich; Berthold Hedwig; Simone Prinz; Manuela Nowotny
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Tonotopically arranged traveling waves in the miniature hearing organ of bushcrickets.

Authors:  Arun Palghat Udayashankar; Manfred Kössl; Manuela Nowotny
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Competition and cooperation in a synchronous bushcricket chorus.

Authors:  M Hartbauer; L Haitzinger; M Kainz; H Römer
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  Comparative micromechanics of bushcricket ears with and without a specialized auditory fovea region in the crista acustica.

Authors:  Jan Scherberich; Roxana Taszus; Alexander Stoessel; Manuela Nowotny
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Lateralization of travelling wave response in the hearing organ of bushcrickets.

Authors:  Arun Palghat Udayashankar; Manfred Kössl; Manuela Nowotny
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Position-dependent hearing in three species of bushcrickets (Tettigoniidae, Orthoptera).

Authors:  Reinhard Lakes-Harlan; Jan Scherberich
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 2.963

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.