Literature DB >> 21993567

Radical prostatectomy: value of prostate MRI in surgical planning.

Nelly Tan1, Daniel J A Margolis, Timothy D McClure, Albert Thomas, David S Finley, Robert E Reiter, Jiaoti Huang, Steven S Raman.   

Abstract

The introduction of serum prostate-specific antigen to the prostate cancer screening algorithm has led to an increase in prostate cancer diagnosis as well as a migration toward lower-stage cancer at the time of diagnosis. This stage migration has coincided with changes in treatment options; these include active surveillance, new therapies, and advances in surgical techniques. Use of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) as a surgical technique has seen a significant increase over the past several years: the number of patients undergoing RARP has risen from 1% to 40% of all prostatectomies from 2001-2006 to as many as 80% in 2010. The robotic interface provides a 3D magnified view of the surgical field, intuitive instrument manipulation, motion scaling, tremor filtration, and excellent dexterity and range of motion. However, in some cases, the lack of tactile (haptic) feedback may limit the surgeon's decision making ability in assessing malignant involvement of the neurovascular bundles. Pre-operative planning relies on nomograms based on limited clinical and prostate biopsy information. The surgical decision to spare or resect the neurovascular bundles is based on clinical information which is not spatially or anatomically based. Advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may provide spatially localized information to fill this void and aid surgical planning, particularly for robotic surgeons. In this review, we discuss the potential role of pre-operative MRI in surgical planning for radical prostatectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21993567     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-011-9805-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Imaging        ISSN: 0942-8925


  12 in total

Review 1.  Prevalence of haptic feedback in robot-mediated surgery: a systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Farshid Amirabdollahian; Salvatore Livatino; Behrad Vahedi; Radhika Gudipati; Patrick Sheen; Shan Gawrie-Mohan; Nikhil Vasdev
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-12-01

2.  In-Bore 3-T MR-guided Transrectal Targeted Prostate Biopsy: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2-based Diagnostic Performance for Detection of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Nelly Tan; Wei-Chan Lin; Pooria Khoshnoodi; Nazanin H Asvadi; Jeffrey Yoshida; Daniel J A Margolis; David S K Lu; Holden Wu; Kyung Hyun Sung; David Y Lu; Jaioti Huang; Steven S Raman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Proposal of a post-prostatectomy clinical target volume based on pre-operative MRI: volumetric and dosimetric comparison to the RTOG guidelines.

Authors:  Jennifer Croke; Jillian Maclean; Balazs Nyiri; Yan Li; Kyle Malone; Leonard Avruch; Cathleen Kayser; Shawn Malone
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Newer concepts in neural anatomy and neurovascular preservation in robotic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Sailaja Pisipati; Adnan Ali; Rao S Mandalapu; George K Haines Iii; Paras Singhal; Balaji N Reddy; Robert Leung; Ashutosh K Tewari
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2014-10

5.  Development of a Three-dimensional Surgical Navigation System with Magnetic Resonance Angiography and a Three-dimensional Printer for Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Wataru Jomoto; Masao Tanooka; Hiroshi Doi; Keisuke Kikuchi; Chiemi Mitsuie; Yusuke Yamada; Toru Suzuki; Toshiko Yamano; Reiichi Ishikura; Noriko Kotoura; Shingo Yamamoto
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-01-02

6.  Comparison of 3D printed prostate models with standard radiological information to aid understanding of the precise location of prostate cancer: A construct validation study.

Authors:  Jan Ebbing; Fredrik Jäderling; Justin W Collins; Olof Akre; Stefan Carlsson; Jonas Höijer; Mats J Olsson; Peter N Wiklund
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  "In-Bore" MRI-Guided Prostate Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Results from 140 Consecutive Patients.

Authors:  Daniele D'Agostino; Daniele Romagnoli; Marco Giampaoli; Federico Mineo Bianchi; Paolo Corsi; Alessandro Del Rosso; Riccardo Schiavina; Eugenio Brunocilla; Walter Artibani; Angelo Porreca
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2020-03-20

8.  Can diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging predict a high Gleason score of prostate cancer?

Authors:  Katsumi Shigemura; Nozomu Yamanaka; Masuo Yamashita
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-04-16

9.  3.0-T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging modifies the template of endoscopic, conventional radical prostatectomy in all cancer risk categories
.

Authors:  Mieszko Kozikowski; Jan Powroźnik; Wojciech Malewski; Szymon Kawecki; Sebastian Piotrowicz; Wojciech Michalak; Łukasz Nyk; Magdalena Gola; Jakub Dobruch
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 3.318

Review 10.  A review and guide to creating patient specific 3D printed anatomical models from MRI for benign gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Teresa E Flaxman; Carly M Cooke; Olivier X Miguel; Adnan M Sheikh; Sukhbir S Singh
Journal:  3D Print Med       Date:  2021-07-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.