Literature DB >> 21993562

Meta-analysis combining new and existing data sets confirms that the TERT-CLPTM1L locus influences melanoma risk.

Matthew H Law, Grant W Montgomery, Kevin M Brown, Nicholas G Martin, Graham J Mann, Nicholas K Hayward, Stuart MacGregor.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21993562      PMCID: PMC3258346          DOI: 10.1038/jid.2011.322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Invest Dermatol        ISSN: 0022-202X            Impact factor:   8.551


× No keyword cloud information.

Letter

A number of GWAS have observed association between SNPs located in 5p15.33 with increased risk for a range of cancers, including some non-melanoma skin cancers (Baird, 2010). Contrary to the increased risk observed for other cancers the peak variant, rs401681 C allele, has been associated with a decreased risk for melanoma (OR=0.86, 95% CI 0.81–0.91 p=5.0×10−8) (Stacey ). There have been two attempts at independent replication. Nan et al., (2011) observed a similar direction of effect in a small sample (OR=0.73, 95% CI 0.59–0.91). However an additional replication study observed no evidence for association between rs401681 C allele and melanoma (OR=1.01, 95% CI 0.87–1.19) (Pooley ). As replication has been inconsistent, we present here unpublished Australian data and rationalize the findings. The 5p15.33 SNPs are located within or adjacent to two genes in strong LD, encoding Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase (TERT, MIM: 187270) and CLPTM1-like protein (CRR9p; CLPTM1L, MIM: 612585). CLPTM1L was identified as up-regulated in cisplatin resistant cancer cells (Yamamoto ) and while a role for CLPTM1L should not be excluded little is known about its function. TERT is a striking candidate as it encodes the catalytic subunit of telomerase. Incomplete replacement of telomere repeat sequences by telomerase following their loss during S phase is a likely cause of cell senescence (Shawi ). While TERT expression is generally absent in adult tissues it is enhanced in most, but not all, cancerous cells (Engelhardt ; Kolquist ). Nevi (moles) result from melanocyte proliferation and nevus count is positively associated with melanoma risk. Longer telomeres have been associated with increased nevus count and size as well as a non-significant increase in melanoma risk (OR 1.85, 95% CI 0.99–3.44) (Han ). Nan et al, (2011) reported a marginal association between the rs401681 C allele and shorter telomere length, an intriguing result given their earlier observation of decreased nevus count in those with shorter telomere length (Han ). Specifically, rs401681 C may associate with reduced melanoma incidence via shortened telomere mediated inhibition of nevi growth. However a far larger study observed no association between rs401681 and telomere length (Pooley ). We recently performed a large melanoma GWAS in a Caucasian population by combining 2,168 cases from the Q-MEGA (Baxter ) and AMFS studies (Cust ) and 4,387 controls combined from 3 studies (Baxter ; Cust ; Painter ). This population gave sufficient power to detect effect sizes in line with other cancer GWAS (1.20.5). Locuszoom (Pruim ) was used to plot SNP significance values across the region spanning TERT and CLPTM1L, which confirms there is indeed an association peak between TERT and CLPTM1, albeit below genome wide significance (Figure 1). Although imputation is able to fill in the missing data in cases where SNPs were not present on all arrays used, there remain regions where SNPs could not be well imputed, which in our case is a 30kb block within TERT. However those SNPs directly genotyped in this region were not meaningfully associated with melanoma (boxed squares, Figure 1) indicating the association signal between TERT and CLPTM1L does not extend into this region. Key SNP rs401681 is not on Omni1-Quad arrays. It was hence genotyped separately using the Sequenom platform (Brown ).
Figure 1

Genome wide association results for the TERT-CLPTM1L locus. Solid triangles represent genotyped SNPs, and hollow triangles fully imputed SNPs. The top imputed SNP rs13356727 is displayed as a purple diamond and the degree of LD (r2) with all other plotted SNPs indicated by their colour. The other discussed SNPs, the fully genotyped rs4975616 and rs401681 have been singled out. While all other plotted p values are derived from the imputed dosage scores there was insufficient information to well impute SNPs on the whole data set for a 30k region spanning the central part of TERT. Genotyped p values for this 30k region have been included as boxed squares, indicating the association signal does not extend into the central part of TERT.

In the combined Australian dataset the rs401681 allele C was clearly inversely associated with melanoma as previously observed, but did not reach genome-wide significance (p=0.00107, Table 1). Meta-analysis of rs401681 C allele across all four studies supports the association with reduced melanoma rates (Stacey et al., 2009; Pooley et al., 2010; Nan et al., 2011). As the I2 was high at 48.98 the random effect model is most appropriate (random effect p=3.00×10−4, OR=0.873 95% CI 0.812–0.939; fixed effect p=9×10−10, OR=0.871 95% CI 0.833–0.910). A forest plot is available in the supplementary data (Sup. Figure 1).rs401681 was not our highest association signal in this region. The strongest association for the TERT-CLPTM1L was observed at rs4975616 (Table 1), which has previously been associated with lung cancer (Broderick et al., 2009), and higher again at the fully imputed rs13356727 (Table 1). rs13356727 lies less than 10 kb from rs401681 and is also between TERT and CLPTM1L (Figure 1). All 3 SNPs exhibit strong LD (r2>0.8) with one another (Supplementary Figure 3), and all fall within the same LD block that spans the TERT promotor and the 3’ end of the CLPTM1L gene (Supplementary Figure 2). The signal at rs13356727 remained significant following covariation by rs401681 (Table 1). Similarly, covarying for rs13356727 abolished all signal at rs401681 (C allele p=0.512, OR=1.071, 95% CI 0.873–1.312). When each SNP was covaried by the other two only rs13356727 remains significant (p=0.046, OR=0.804, 95% CI 0.649–0.996). This suggests that rs13356727 represents a better proxy for the potential causal variant in this region leading to a reduced risk for melanoma. As nevi count is also associated with melanoma we hypothesized that the inverse association of rs13356727 with melanoma may result from an interaction with mole count. Self reported mole count (“None”, ”Few”, ”Some” and “Many”) was available for 1398 controls and 1592 cases with melanoma. Co varying for mole count did not meaningfully change the association between rs13356727 and melanoma (subset melanoma association p=4.88×10−5 OR 0.800 95% CI 0.718–0.891; subset co-varied by mole count p=3.01×10−4, OR 0.816 95% CI 0.731–0.911). The protective rs13356727 A allele was also associated with a reduction in mole count (regression of self reported mole count on rs13356727 100,000 permutations p=0.00042). rs401681 C and rs4975616 A alleles were also associated with reduced mole count to a lesser extent (pperm=0.00407 and pperm 0.00069 respectively).
Table 1

Association results at the TERT- CLPTM1L locus

Association of genotyping results with melanomaAssociation of imputed dosage scores with melanomaaResults when co-varied by rs401681

SNP: Tested alleleN genotyped Case/ControlTested allele freq Case/Controlp valueOR (95% CI)2 bp valueOR (95% CI)p valueOR (95% CI)
rs401681: C2035/43450.5388/0.56970.00107c0.883 (0.819–0.951)NANANANANA

rs4975616: A c2168/43610.5542/0.58990.0001010.864 (0.803–0.930)0.9880.000210.869 (0.807–0.937)0.1260.848 (0.686–1.048)

rs13356727: A dNANANANA0.9079.96×10−50.858 (0.795–0.926)0.04550.803 (0.649–0.996)

Total population following imputation was 2168 cases and 4387 controls; rs4975616’s imputation p value is generated using the combination of genotyped and imputed data, while rs13356727 is fully imputed.

r̂2 is a measure of imputation quality; it is equivalent to the ratio between the variance of the imputed genotypes and the expected binomial variance 2p(1-p) at HWE where p is the estimated allele frequency (Li ).

genotyped SNP most associated with melanoma.

imputed SNP most associated with melanoma

In conclusion we examined the role of TERT-CLPTM1L variants in determining melanoma risk by presenting new data on a large Australian case-control sample. Combining these data with inconclusive existing data clarifies that TERT-CLPTM1L variants do influence risk, albeit with a relatively small effect size. In our data there was an association with mole count and it is intriguing to speculate that the inverse association (relative to other cancers) may be due to an interaction with nevus propensity. However, the observed melanoma association was unchanged by correction with mole count and further work is required to dissect the specific role variation at TERT-CLPTM1L plays in mole count and melanoma. When considered in the light of studies by Nan et al (2011) and Han et al (2009), it may be that the apparently independent association we observed between this loci and melanoma or mole count was due to a functional variant influencing telomere length, which in turn altered melanoma and nevus development in a complex manner.
  17 in total

Review 1.  Variation at the TERT locus and predisposition for cancer.

Authors:  Duncan M Baird
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Med       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 5.600

2.  Common sequence variants on 20q11.22 confer melanoma susceptibility.

Authors:  Kevin M Brown; Stuart Macgregor; Grant W Montgomery; David W Craig; Zhen Zhen Zhao; Kelly Iyadurai; Anjali K Henders; Nils Homer; Megan J Campbell; Mitchell Stark; Shane Thomas; Helen Schmid; Elizabeth A Holland; Elizabeth M Gillanders; David L Duffy; Judith A Maskiell; Jodie Jetann; Megan Ferguson; Dietrich A Stephan; Anne E Cust; David Whiteman; Adele Green; Håkan Olsson; Susana Puig; Paola Ghiorzo; Johan Hansson; Florence Demenais; Alisa M Goldstein; Nelleke A Gruis; David E Elder; Julia Newton Bishop; Richard F Kefford; Graham G Giles; Bruce K Armstrong; Joanne F Aitken; John L Hopper; Nicholas G Martin; Jeffrey M Trent; Graham J Mann; Nicholas K Hayward
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2008-05-18       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  No association between TERT-CLPTM1L single nucleotide polymorphism rs401681 and mean telomere length or cancer risk.

Authors:  Karen A Pooley; Jonathan Tyrer; Mitul Shah; Kristy E Driver; Jean Leyland; Judith Brown; Tina Audley; Lesley McGuffog; Bruce A J Ponder; Paul D P Pharoah; Douglas F Easton; Alison M Dunning
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  A prospective study of telomere length and the risk of skin cancer.

Authors:  Jiali Han; Abrar A Qureshi; Jennifer Prescott; Qun Guo; Li Ye; David J Hunter; Immaculata De Vivo
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 8.551

5.  Population-based, case-control-family design to investigate genetic and environmental influences on melanoma risk: Australian Melanoma Family Study.

Authors:  Anne E Cust; Helen Schmid; Judith A Maskiell; Jodie Jetann; Megan Ferguson; Elizabeth A Holland; Chantelle Agha-Hamilton; Mark A Jenkins; John Kelly; Richard F Kefford; Graham G Giles; Bruce K Armstrong; Joanne F Aitken; John L Hopper; Graham J Mann
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  New common variants affecting susceptibility to basal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Simon N Stacey; Patrick Sulem; Gisli Masson; Sigurjon A Gudjonsson; Gudmar Thorleifsson; Margret Jakobsdottir; Asgeir Sigurdsson; Daniel F Gudbjartsson; Bardur Sigurgeirsson; Kristrun R Benediktsdottir; Kristin Thorisdottir; Rafn Ragnarsson; Dominique Scherer; Kari Hemminki; Peter Rudnai; Eugene Gurzau; Kvetoslava Koppova; Rafael Botella-Estrada; Virtudes Soriano; Pablo Juberias; Berta Saez; Yolanda Gilaberte; Victoria Fuentelsaz; Cristina Corredera; Matilde Grasa; Veronica Höiom; Annika Lindblom; Johannes J Bonenkamp; Michelle M van Rossum; Katja K H Aben; Esther de Vries; Mario Santinami; Maria G Di Mauro; Andrea Maurichi; Judith Wendt; Pia Hochleitner; Hubert Pehamberger; Julius Gudmundsson; Droplaug N Magnusdottir; Solveig Gretarsdottir; Hilma Holm; Valgerdur Steinthorsdottir; Michael L Frigge; Thorarinn Blondal; Jona Saemundsdottir; Hjördis Bjarnason; Kristleifur Kristjansson; Gyda Bjornsdottir; Ichiro Okamoto; Licia Rivoltini; Monica Rodolfo; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Johan Hansson; Eduardo Nagore; José I Mayordomo; Rajiv Kumar; Margaret R Karagas; Heather H Nelson; Jeffrey R Gulcher; Thorunn Rafnar; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Jon H Olafsson; Augustine Kong; Kari Stefansson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-07-05       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 7.  Telomerase, senescence and ageing.

Authors:  May Shawi; Chantal Autexier
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 5.432

8.  Deciphering the impact of common genetic variation on lung cancer risk: a genome-wide association study.

Authors:  Peter Broderick; Yufei Wang; Jayaram Vijayakrishnan; Athena Matakidou; Margaret R Spitz; Timothy Eisen; Christopher I Amos; Richard S Houlston
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Relative contribution of normal and neoplastic cells determines telomerase activity and telomere length in primary cancers of the prostate, colon, and sarcoma.

Authors:  M Engelhardt; J Albanell; P Drullinsky; W Han; J Guillem; H I Scher; V Reuter; M A Moore
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Genome-wide association study identifies a locus at 7p15.2 associated with endometriosis.

Authors:  Jodie N Painter; Carl A Anderson; Dale R Nyholt; Stuart Macgregor; Jianghai Lin; Sang Hong Lee; Ann Lambert; Zhen Z Zhao; Fenella Roseman; Qun Guo; Scott D Gordon; Leanne Wallace; Anjali K Henders; Peter M Visscher; Peter Kraft; Nicholas G Martin; Andrew P Morris; Susan A Treloar; Stephen H Kennedy; Stacey A Missmer; Grant W Montgomery; Krina T Zondervan
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-12-12       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  24 in total

1.  Blood DNA methylation, nevi number, and the risk of melanoma.

Authors:  Laura Pergoli; Chiara Favero; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Letizia Tarantini; Donato Calista; Tommaso Cavalleri; Laura Angelici; Dario Consonni; Pier A Bertazzi; Angela C Pesatori; Maria T Landi; Valentina Bollati
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.599

2.  Association of CRR9 locus with elevated risk of squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Tao Liu; Li Jiang; Xiaoxing Lv; Jinqing Li; Yuejun Li; Wangzhou Li; Xueyong Li; Jing Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-03-15

3.  Association of Interferon Regulatory Factor-4 Polymorphism rs12203592 With Divergent Melanoma Pathways.

Authors:  David C Gibbs; Irene Orlow; Jennifer I Bramson; Peter A Kanetsky; Li Luo; Anne Kricker; Bruce K Armstrong; Hoda Anton-Culver; Stephen B Gruber; Loraine D Marrett; Richard P Gallagher; Roberto Zanetti; Stefano Rosso; Terence Dwyer; Ajay Sharma; Emily La Pilla; Lynn From; Klaus J Busam; Anne E Cust; David W Ollila; Colin B Begg; Marianne Berwick; Nancy E Thomas
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Interactions between ultraviolet light and MC1R and OCA2 variants are determinants of childhood nevus and freckle phenotypes.

Authors:  Anna E Barón; Nancy L Asdigian; Victoria Gonzalez; Jenny Aalborg; Tamara Terzian; Regan A Stiegmann; Enrique C Torchia; Marianne Berwick; Robert P Dellavalle; Joseph G Morelli; Stefan T Mokrohisky; Lori A Crane; Neil F Box
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Inherited Genetic Variants Associated with Melanoma BRAF/NRAS Subtypes.

Authors:  Nancy E Thomas; Sharon N Edmiston; Irene Orlow; Peter A Kanetsky; Li Luo; David C Gibbs; Eloise A Parrish; Honglin Hao; Klaus J Busam; Bruce K Armstrong; Anne Kricker; Anne E Cust; Hoda Anton-Culver; Stephen B Gruber; Richard P Gallagher; Roberto Zanetti; Stefano Rosso; Lidia Sacchetto; Terence Dwyer; David W Ollila; Colin B Begg; Marianne Berwick; Kathleen Conway
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 8.551

6.  Update on the Epidemiology of Melanoma.

Authors:  Steven T Chen; Alan C Geller; Hensin Tsao
Journal:  Curr Dermatol Rep       Date:  2013-03-01

7.  Correlation of CLPTM1L polymorphisms with lung cancer susceptibility and response to cisplatin-based chemotherapy in a Chinese Han population.

Authors:  Yiqian Liang; Asmitananda Thakur; Lei Gao; Ting Wang; Shuo Zhang; Hui Ren; Junhui Meng; Tingting Geng; Tianbo Jin; Mingwei Chen
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-08-26

8.  Establishment and characterization of a highly tumourigenic and cancer stem cell enriched pancreatic cancer cell line as a well defined model system.

Authors:  Johannes Fredebohm; Michael Boettcher; Christian Eisen; Matthias M Gaida; Anette Heller; Shereen Keleg; Jörg Tost; Karin M Greulich-Bode; Agnes Hotz-Wagenblatt; Mark Lathrop; Nathalia A Giese; Jörg D Hoheisel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Identification of nine new susceptibility loci for testicular cancer, including variants near DAZL and PRDM14.

Authors:  Elise Ruark; Sheila Seal; Heather McDonald; Feng Zhang; Anna Elliot; Kingwai Lau; Elizabeth Perdeaux; Elizabeth Rapley; Rosalind Eeles; Julian Peto; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Kenneth Muir; Jeremie Nsengimana; Janet Shipley; D Timothy Bishop; Michael R Stratton; Douglas F Easton; Robert A Huddart; Nazneen Rahman; Clare Turnbull
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-05-12       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Genome-wide meta-analysis points to CTC1 and ZNF676 as genes regulating telomere homeostasis in humans.

Authors:  Massimo Mangino; Shih-Jen Hwang; Timothy D Spector; Steven C Hunt; Masayuki Kimura; Annette L Fitzpatrick; Lene Christiansen; Inge Petersen; Clara C Elbers; Tamara Harris; Wei Chen; Sathanur R Srinivasan; Jeremy D Kark; Athanase Benetos; Said El Shamieh; Sophie Visvikis-Siest; Kaare Christensen; Gerald S Berenson; Ana M Valdes; Ana Viñuela; Melissa Garcia; Donna K Arnett; Ulrich Broeckel; Michael A Province; James S Pankow; Candace Kammerer; Yongmei Liu; Michael Nalls; Sarah Tishkoff; Fridtjof Thomas; Elad Ziv; Bruce M Psaty; Joshua C Bis; Jerome I Rotter; Kent D Taylor; Erin Smith; Nicholas J Schork; Daniel Levy; Abraham Aviv
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 6.150

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.