Literature DB >> 21993431

First prospective, multi-centre clinical experience with a novel left ventricular quadripolar lead.

Johannes Sperzel1, Wilfried Dänschel, Klaus-Jürgen Gutleben, Wolfgang Kranig, Peter Mortensen, Derek Connelly, Hans-Joachim Trappe, Karlheinz Seidl, Gabor Duray, Burkert Pieske, Jochem Stockinger, Giuseppe Boriani, Werner Jung, Richard Schilling, Linda Saberi, Benoit Hallier, Marcus Simon, Christopher A Rinaldi.   

Abstract

AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is sometimes complicated by elevated pacing thresholds and phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS), both of which may require that the coronary sinus lead be repositioned. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of a novel quadripolar electrode lead and cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) device that enables electrical repositioning, potentially obviating a lead reposition procedure. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Patients indicated for CRT were enrolled and received a quadripolar electrode lead and CRT-D device (Quartetmodel 1458Q and Promote Q; St Jude Medical, Sylmar, CA, USA). Electrical data, and the presence of PNS during pacing from each left ventricular (LV) configuration, were documented at pre-hospital discharge and at 1 month. Seventy-five patients were enrolled and 71 were successfully implanted with a Quartetlead. Electrical measurements were stable over the follow-up period. Ninety-seven per cent (64 of 66) of patients had one or more programmable configurations with a threshold < 2.5 V and no PNS vs. 86% (57 of 66) if only conventional bipolar configurations were considered. Physicians were able to use the increased programming options to manage threshold changes and PNS.
CONCLUSION: The new quadripolar electrode LV lead provides more programming options to address common problems faced when managing CRT patients. Electrical measurements from new vectors are comparable with conventional configurations. Furthermore, 11% of patients in the study suffered PNS on all conventional bipolar vectors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21993431     DOI: 10.1093/europace/eur322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  27 in total

Review 1.  Updates in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Chronic Heart Failure: Review of Multisite Pacing.

Authors:  Antonios P Antoniadis; Ben Sieniewicz; Justin Gould; Bradley Porter; Jessica Webb; Simon Claridge; Jonathan M Behar; Christopher Aldo Rinaldi
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2017-10

2.  Improved implant and postoperative lead performance in CRT-D patients implanted with a quadripolar left ventricular lead. A 6-month follow-up analysis from a multicenter prospective comparative study.

Authors:  Giovanni B Forleo; Luigi Di Biase; Germana Panattoni; Massimo Mantica; Quintino Parisi; Annamaria Martino; Augusto Pappalardo; Domenico Sergi; Manfredi Tesauro; Lida P Papavasileiou; Luca Santini; Leonardo Calò; Claudio Tondo; Andrea Natale; Francesco Romeo
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Limitations of chronic delivery of multi-vein left ventricular stimulation for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Jonathan M Behar; Julian Bostock; Matthew Ginks; Tom Jackson; Manav Sohal; Simon Claridge; Reza Razavi; Christopher Aldo Rinaldi
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  A Meta-Analysis Of Quadripolar Versus Bipolar Left Ventricular Leads On Post-Procedural Outcomes.

Authors:  Mohit K Turagam; Muhammad R Afzal; Sandia Iskander; Luigi Di Biase; Andrea Natale; Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-08-31

5.  Left ventricular or biventricular pacing? Single or multielectrode leads? An implanter's viewpoint.

Authors:  Kamal K Sethi; Kabir Sethi; Surendra K Chutani
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 6.  Phrenic nerve stimulation in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Ghassan Moubarak; Abdeslam Bouzeman; Jacky Ollitrault; Frederic Anselme; Serge Cazeau
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 7.  Optimizing CRT - Do We Need More Leads and Delivery Methods.

Authors:  Pieter Martens; Frederik Hendrik Verbrugge; Wilfried Mullens
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-04-30

8.  Single-center experience of a quadripolar pacing lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Antonello Vado; Endrj Menardi; Guido Rossetti; Gianpaolo Ballari; Mauro Feola; Marco Bobbio
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 1.900

9.  Phrenic nerve stimulation in CRT patients and benefits of electronic lead repositioning: the ERACE trial.

Authors:  Stephan Goetze; Pascal Defaye; Alexander Bauer; Matthias Merkel; Olivier Bizeau; Sven Treusch; Klaus Contzen; Claus Juenger; Joachim Winter
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 10.  Electromechanical dyssynchrony and resynchronization of the failing heart.

Authors:  Jonathan A Kirk; David A Kass
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 17.367

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.