Literature DB >> 21993270

Approach to the intraoperative consultation for neurosurgical specimens.

Hilary Lynch Somerset1, Bette Kay Kleinschmidt-DeMasters.   

Abstract

Intraoperative consultation remains an invaluable tool in the initial evaluation of surgically excised specimens. Good communication is required between the pathologist and surgeon to obtain the best care for their mutual patient. Intraoperative consultation (frozen section, FS) provides a preliminary diagnosis for the surgeon and aids in guiding his/her subsequent surgical approach. For the pathologist, it serves to assess tissue adequacy in the context of the clinical and imaging features of the patient. FS can guarantee that the surgeon is in the desired anatomic location, but most often serves to ensure that adequate amounts of abnormal, and likely diagnostic, tissue will be available to the pathologist to render a final diagnosis on permanent sections. The preliminary evaluation of tissue at the time of intraoperative FS also guides the pathologist in the ordering of ancillary studies, some of which need to be performed on fresh or frozen tissues and must be sent at the time of the intraoperative consultation. This brief review will specifically focus on the role of the pathologist who is called to perform a FS for a neurosurgical specimen. We will discuss (1) the goals of the neurosurgeon for the intraoperative consultation, (2) how to achieve optimal communication between neurosurgeon and pathologist at the time of the FS, (3) what constitutes reasonable and unreasonable expectations by the neurosurgeon for the FS, (4) choices of techniques that can be used by the pathologist, (5) what tissue should be triaged, and (6) common discrepancies between FS and permanent section diagnoses in central nervous system disorders. The published literature on FS and permanent section discrepancies will be briefly reviewed so that pathologists will understand that some difficulties are inherent in neurosurgical specimens and are not specific to their practice, or to a given pathologist. Hopefully, this knowledge will enhance pathologists' confidence as they negotiate how best to handle this time-sensitive, and sometimes angst-producing, task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21993270     DOI: 10.1097/PAP.0b013e3182169934

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Anat Pathol        ISSN: 1072-4109            Impact factor:   3.875


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Rapid frozen sections in neuropathology].

Authors:  J Haybaeck; G von Campe; J A Hainfellner
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  Rapid Intraoperative Diagnosis of Pediatric Brain Tumors Using Stimulated Raman Histology.

Authors:  Todd C Hollon; Spencer Lewis; Balaji Pandian; Yashar S Niknafs; Mia R Garrard; Hugh Garton; Cormac O Maher; Kathryn McFadden; Matija Snuderl; Andrew P Lieberman; Karin Muraszko; Sandra Camelo-Piragua; Daniel A Orringer
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 3.  Role of optical spectroscopic methods in neuro-oncological sciences.

Authors:  Maryam Bahreini
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2015

4.  Sensitive and rapid detection of TERT promoter and IDH mutations in diffuse gliomas.

Authors:  Bill H Diplas; Heng Liu; Rui Yang; Landon J Hansen; Alexis L Zachem; Fangping Zhao; Darell D Bigner; Roger E McLendon; Yuchen Jiao; Yiping He; Matthew S Waitkus; Hai Yan
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 5.  Label-free brain tumor imaging using Raman-based methods.

Authors:  Todd Hollon; Daniel A Orringer
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 4.506

6.  A Comparison between the Diagnostic Accuracy of Frozen Section and Permanent Section Analyses in Central Nervous System

Authors:  Razie Amraei; Afshin Moradi; Hanieh Zham; Mahsa Ahadi; Maryam Baikpour; Azadeh Rakhshan
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2017-03-01

7.  Rapid intraoperative histology of unprocessed surgical specimens via fibre-laser-based stimulated Raman scattering microscopy.

Authors:  Daniel A Orringer; Balaji Pandian; Yashar S Niknafs; Todd C Hollon; Julianne Boyle; Spencer Lewis; Mia Garrard; Shawn L Hervey-Jumper; Hugh J L Garton; Cormac O Maher; Jason A Heth; Oren Sagher; D Andrew Wilkinson; Matija Snuderl; Sriram Venneti; Shakti H Ramkissoon; Kathryn A McFadden; Amanda Fisher-Hubbard; Andrew P Lieberman; Timothy D Johnson; X Sunney Xie; Jay K Trautman; Christian W Freudiger; Sandra Camelo-Piragua
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 25.671

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of frozen section of central nervous system lesions: a 10-year study.

Authors:  Maliheh Khoddami; Ali Akbarzadeh; Afshin Mordai; Farahnaz Bidari-Zerehpoush; Hamid Alipour; Sara Samadzadeh; Bijan Alipour
Journal:  Iran J Child Neurol       Date:  2015

9.  Label-free delineation of brain tumors by coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy in an orthotopic mouse model and human glioblastoma.

Authors:  Ortrud Uckermann; Roberta Galli; Sandra Tamosaityte; Elke Leipnitz; Kathrin D Geiger; Gabriele Schackert; Edmund Koch; Gerald Steiner; Matthias Kirsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Rapid Label-Free Analysis of Brain Tumor Biopsies by Near Infrared Raman and Fluorescence Spectroscopy-A Study of 209 Patients.

Authors:  Roberta Galli; Matthias Meinhardt; Edmund Koch; Gabriele Schackert; Gerald Steiner; Matthias Kirsch; Ortrud Uckermann
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 6.244

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.