Todd Hollon1, Daniel A Orringer2. 1. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA. 2. New York University, New York, NY, USA. Daniel.Orringer@nyulangone.org.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Label-free Raman-based imaging techniques create the possibility of bringing chemical and histologic data into the operation room. Relying on the intrinsic biochemical properties of tissues to generate image contrast and optical tissue sectioning, Raman-based imaging methods can be used to detect microscopic tumor infiltration and diagnose brain tumor subtypes. METHODS: Here, we review the application of three Raman-based imaging methods to neurosurgical oncology: Raman spectroscopy, coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS) microscopy, and stimulated Raman histology (SRH). RESULTS: Raman spectroscopy allows for chemical characterization of tissue and can differentiate normal and tumor-infiltrated tissue based on variations in macromolecule content, both ex vivo and in vivo. To improve signal-to-noise ratio compared to conventional Raman spectroscopy, a second pulsed excitation laser can be used to coherently drive the vibrational frequency of specific Raman active chemical bonds (i.e. symmetric stretching of -CH2 bonds). Coherent Raman imaging, including CARS and stimulated Raman scattering microscopy, has been shown to detect microscopic brain tumor infiltration in fresh brain tumor specimens with submicron image resolution. Advances in fiber-laser technology have allowed for the development of intraoperative SRH as well as artificial intelligence algorithms to facilitate interpretation of SRH images. With molecular diagnostics becoming an essential part of brain tumor classification, preliminary studies have demonstrated that Raman-based methods can be used to diagnose glioma molecular classes intraoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate how label-free Raman-based imaging methods can be used to improve the management of brain tumor patients by detecting tumor infiltration, guiding tumor biopsy/resection, and providing images for histopathologic and molecular diagnosis.
INTRODUCTION: Label-free Raman-based imaging techniques create the possibility of bringing chemical and histologic data into the operation room. Relying on the intrinsic biochemical properties of tissues to generate image contrast and optical tissue sectioning, Raman-based imaging methods can be used to detect microscopic tumor infiltration and diagnose brain tumor subtypes. METHODS: Here, we review the application of three Raman-based imaging methods to neurosurgical oncology: Raman spectroscopy, coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS) microscopy, and stimulated Raman histology (SRH). RESULTS: Raman spectroscopy allows for chemical characterization of tissue and can differentiate normal and tumor-infiltrated tissue based on variations in macromolecule content, both ex vivo and in vivo. To improve signal-to-noise ratio compared to conventional Raman spectroscopy, a second pulsed excitation laser can be used to coherently drive the vibrational frequency of specific Raman active chemical bonds (i.e. symmetric stretching of -CH2 bonds). Coherent Raman imaging, including CARS and stimulated Raman scattering microscopy, has been shown to detect microscopic brain tumor infiltration in fresh brain tumor specimens with submicron image resolution. Advances in fiber-laser technology have allowed for the development of intraoperative SRH as well as artificial intelligence algorithms to facilitate interpretation of SRH images. With molecular diagnostics becoming an essential part of brain tumor classification, preliminary studies have demonstrated that Raman-based methods can be used to diagnose glioma molecular classes intraoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate how label-free Raman-based imaging methods can be used to improve the management of brain tumor patients by detecting tumor infiltration, guiding tumor biopsy/resection, and providing images for histopathologic and molecular diagnosis.
Authors: Minbiao Ji; Spencer Lewis; Sandra Camelo-Piragua; Shakti H Ramkissoon; Matija Snuderl; Sriram Venneti; Amanda Fisher-Hubbard; Mia Garrard; Dan Fu; Anthony C Wang; Jason A Heth; Cormac O Maher; Nader Sanai; Timothy D Johnson; Christian W Freudiger; Oren Sagher; Xiaoliang Sunney Xie; Daniel A Orringer Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2015-10-14 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Senada Koljenović; Lin-P'ing Choo-Smith; Tom C Bakker Schut; Johan M Kros; Herbert J van den Berge; Gerwin J Puppels Journal: Lab Invest Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 5.662
Authors: Christian W Freudiger; Wei Min; Brian G Saar; Sijia Lu; Gary R Holtom; Chengwei He; Jason C Tsai; Jing X Kang; X Sunney Xie Journal: Science Date: 2008-12-19 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Charles H Camp; Young Jong Lee; John M Heddleston; Christopher M Hartshorn; Angela R Hight Walker; Jeremy N Rich; Justin D Lathia; Marcus T Cicerone Journal: Nat Photonics Date: 2014 Impact factor: 38.771
Authors: Elen Tolstik; Nairveen Ali; Shuxia Guo; Paul Ebersbach; Dorothe Möllmann; Paula Arias-Loza; Johann Dierks; Irina Schuler; Erik Freier; Jörg Debus; Hideo A Baba; Peter Nordbeck; Thomas Bocklitz; Kristina Lorenz Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-05-11 Impact factor: 6.208
Authors: Nicolas Neidert; Jakob Straehle; Daniel Erny; Vlad Sacalean; Amir El Rahal; David Steybe; Rainer Schmelzeisen; Andreas Vlachos; Peter Christoph Reinacher; Volker Arnd Coenen; Boris Mizaikoff; Dieter Henrik Heiland; Marco Prinz; Jürgen Beck; Oliver Schnell Journal: Neurosurg Rev Date: 2021-12-16 Impact factor: 3.042
Authors: David Reinecke; Niklas von Spreckelsen; Christian Mawrin; Adrian Ion-Margineanu; Gina Fürtjes; Stephanie T Jünger; Florian Khalid; Christian W Freudiger; Marco Timmer; Maximilian I Ruge; Roland Goldbrunner; Volker Neuschmelting Journal: Acta Neuropathol Commun Date: 2022-08-06 Impact factor: 7.578