Literature DB >> 21993042

Electromyostimulation--a systematic review of the influence of training regimens and stimulation parameters on effectiveness in electromyostimulation training of selected strength parameters.

Andre Filipovic1, Heinz Kleinöder, Ulrike Dörmann, Joachim Mester.   

Abstract

Our first review from our 2-part series investigated the effects of percutaneous electromyostimulation (EMS) on maximal strength, speed strength, jumping and sprinting ability, and power, revealing the effectiveness of different EMS methods for the enhancement of strength parameters. On the basis of these results, this second study systematically reviews training regimens and stimulation parameters to determine their influence on the effectiveness of strength training with EMS. Out of about 200 studies, 89 trials were selected according to predefined criteria: subject age (<35 years), subject health (unimpaired), EMS type (percutaneus stimulation), and study duration (>7 days). To evaluate these trials, we first defined appropriate categories according to the type of EMS (local or whole-body) and type of muscle contraction (isometric, dynamic, isokinetic). Unlike former reviews, this study differentiates between 3 categories of subjects based on their level of fitness (untrained subjects, trained subjects, and elite athletes) and on the types of EMS methods used (local, whole-body, combination). Special focus was on trained and elite athletes. Untrained subjects were investigated for comparison purposes. The primary purpose of this study was to point out the preconditions for producing a stimulus above the training threshold with EMS that activates strength adaptations to give guidelines for implementing EMS effectively in strength training especially in high-performance sports. As a result, the analysis reveals a significant relationship (p < 0.05) between a stimulation intensity of ≥50% maximum voluntary contraction (MVC; 63.2 ± 19.8%) and significant strength gains. To generate this level of MVC, it was possible to identify guidelines for effectively combining training regimens (4.4 ± 1.5 weeks, 3.2 ± 0.9 sessions per week, 17.7 ± 10.9 minutes per session, 6.0 ± 2.4 seconds per contraction with 20.3 ± 9.0% duty cycle) with relevant stimulation parameters (impulse width 306.9 ± 105.1 microseconds, impulse frequency 76.4 ± 20.9 Hz, impulse intensity 63.7 ± 15.9 mA) to optimize training for systematically developing strength abilities (maximal strength, speed strength, jumping and sprinting ability, power).

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21993042     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318212e3ce

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  34 in total

Review 1.  Aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation in the treatment of deconditioned patients in the acute care setting: the role of skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Michael Quittan
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2016-01-12

2.  Effects of electrostimulation and plyometric training program combination on jump height in teenage athletes.

Authors:  Emilio J Martínez-López; Elisa Benito-Martínez; Fidel Hita-Contreras; Amador Lara-Sánchez; Antonio Martínez-Amat
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Chronic effects of superimposed electromyostimulation during cycling on aerobic and anaerobic capacity.

Authors:  Sebastian Mathes; Niklas Lehnen; Tobias Link; Wilhelm Bloch; Joachim Mester; Patrick Wahl
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Effects of a Whole-Body Electrostimulation Program on Strength, Sprinting, Jumping, and Kicking Capacity in Elite Soccer Players.

Authors:  Andre Filipovic; Marijke Grau; Heinz Kleinöder; Philipp Zimmer; Wildor Hollmann; Wilhelm Bloch
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Could superimposed electromyostimulation be an effective training to improve aerobic and anaerobic capacity? Methodological considerations for its development.

Authors:  Francisco J Amaro-Gahete; Alejandro de la O; Lucas Jurado-Fasoli; Jonatan R Ruiz; Ángel Gutiérrez
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Motor point map of upper body muscles.

Authors:  M Behringer; A Franz; M McCourt; J Mester
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Russian Stimulation/Functional Electrical Stimulation in the Treatment of Foot Drop Resulting from Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Case Series.

Authors:  Tina J Wang; Kyungje Sung; Marilyn Wilburn; Jace Allbright
Journal:  Innov Clin Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-01

8.  Effects of Loaded Squat Exercise with and without Application of Superimposed EMS on Physical Performance.

Authors:  Nicolas Wirtz; Christoph Zinner; Ulrike Doermann; Heinz Kleinoeder; Joachim Mester
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 2.988

9.  Effects of an Impulse Frequency Dependent 10-Week Whole-body Electromyostimulation Training Program on Specific Sport Performance Parameters.

Authors:  Joshua Berger; Oliver Ludwig; Stephan Becker; Marco Backfisch; Wolfgang Kemmler; Michael Fröhlich
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 2.988

10.  The effects of whole-body muscle stimulation on body composition and strength parameters: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Luiz Rodrigues-Santana; José Carmelo Adsuar; Hugo Louro; Jorge Pérez-Gómez; Miguel Angel Hernández-Mocholí; Jorge Carlos-Vivas; Rossana Gomez-Campos; Luis Felipe Castelli Correia de Campos
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.