BACKGROUND: The role of circumcision in male HPV acquisition is not clear. METHODS: Male university students (aged 18-20 years) were recruited from 2003 to 2009 and followed up triannually. Shaft/scrotum, glans, and urine samples were tested for 37 α human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes. Cox proportional hazards methods were used to evaluate the association between circumcision and HPV acquisition. Logistic regression was used to assess whether the number of genital sites infected at incident HPV detection or site of incident detection varied by circumcision status. RESULTS: In 477 men, rates of acquiring clinically relevant HPV types (high-risk types plus types 6 and 11) did not differ significantly by circumcision status (hazard ratio for uncircumcised relative to circumcised subjects: 0.9 [95% confidence interval{CI}: 0.7-1.2]). However, compared with circumcised men, uncircumcised men were 10.1 (95% CI: 2.9-35.6) times more likely to have the same HPV type detected in all 3 genital specimens than in a single genital specimen and were 2.7 (95% CI: 1.6-4.5) times more likely to have an HPV-positive urine or glans specimen at first detection. CONCLUSIONS: Although the likelihood of HPV acquisition did not differ by circumcision status, uncircumcised men were more likely than circumcised men to have infections detected at multiple genital sites, which may have implications for HPV transmission.
BACKGROUND: The role of circumcision in male HPV acquisition is not clear. METHODS: Male university students (aged 18-20 years) were recruited from 2003 to 2009 and followed up triannually. Shaft/scrotum, glans, and urine samples were tested for 37 α human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes. Cox proportional hazards methods were used to evaluate the association between circumcision and HPV acquisition. Logistic regression was used to assess whether the number of genital sites infected at incident HPV detection or site of incident detection varied by circumcision status. RESULTS: In 477 men, rates of acquiring clinically relevant HPV types (high-risk types plus types 6 and 11) did not differ significantly by circumcision status (hazard ratio for uncircumcised relative to circumcised subjects: 0.9 [95% confidence interval{CI}: 0.7-1.2]). However, compared with circumcised men, uncircumcised men were 10.1 (95% CI: 2.9-35.6) times more likely to have the same HPV type detected in all 3 genital specimens than in a single genital specimen and were 2.7 (95% CI: 1.6-4.5) times more likely to have an HPV-positive urine or glans specimen at first detection. CONCLUSIONS: Although the likelihood of HPV acquisition did not differ by circumcision status, uncircumcised men were more likely than circumcised men to have infections detected at multiple genital sites, which may have implications for HPV transmission.
Authors: Aaron A R Tobian; Xiangrong Kong; Patti E Gravitt; Kevin P Eaton; Godfrey Kigozi; David Serwadda; Amy E Oliver; Fred Nalugoda; Frederick Makumbi; Michael Z Chen; Maria J Wawer; Thomas C Quinn; Ronald H Gray Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2011-04-01 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Xavier Castellsagué; F Xavier Bosch; Nubia Muñoz; Chris J L M Meijer; Keerti V Shah; Silvia de Sanjose; José Eluf-Neto; Corazon A Ngelangel; Saibua Chichareon; Jennifer S Smith; Rolando Herrero; Victor Moreno; Silvia Franceschi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-04-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Nubia Muñoz; F Xavier Bosch; Silvia de Sanjosé; Rolando Herrero; Xavier Castellsagué; Keerti V Shah; Peter J F Snijders; Chris J L M Meijer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-02-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: C E Greer; C M Wheeler; M B Ladner; K Beutner; M Y Coyne; H Liang; A Langenberg; T S Yen; R Ralston Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1995-08 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Bethany A Weaver; Qinghua Feng; King K Holmes; Nancy Kiviat; Shu-Kuang Lee; Christine Meyer; Mike Stern; Laura A Koutsky Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2004-01-29 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Rachel L Winer; Shu-Kuang Lee; James P Hughes; Diane E Adam; Nancy B Kiviat; Laura A Koutsky Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2003-02-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Bruce K Patterson; Alan Landay; Joan N Siegel; Zareefa Flener; Dennis Pessis; Antonio Chaviano; Robert C Bailey Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Sten H Vermund; José A Tique; Holly M Cassell; Megan E Pask; Philip J Ciampa; Carolyn M Audet Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2013-06-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Lauren E Wilson; Patti Gravitt; Aaron A R Tobian; Godfrey Kigozi; David Serwadda; Fred Nalugoda; Stephen Watya; Maria J Wawer; Ronald H Gray Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2012-10-30 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Isabel Heidegger; Renate Pichler; Barbara Müller; Helmut Klocker; David Oswald; Bernhard Haid; Bettina Zelger; Wolfgang Horninger; Josef Oswald Journal: World J Urol Date: 2013-10-22 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Ginesa Albero; Luisa L Villa; Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce; William Fulp; Mary R Papenfuss; Alan G Nyitray; Beibei Lu; Xavier Castellsagué; Martha Abrahamsen; Danélle Smith; F Xavier Bosch; Jorge Salmerón; Manuel Quiterio; Anna R Giuliano Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2013-01-17 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Ginesa Albero; Xavier Castellsagué; Hui-Yi Lin; William Fulp; Luisa L Villa; Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce; Mary Papenfuss; Martha Abrahamsen; Jorge Salmerón; Manuel Quiterio; Alan G Nyitray; Beibei Lu; F Xavier Bosch; Anna R Giuliano Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2014-02-10 Impact factor: 3.090