| Literature DB >> 21992622 |
Alessio De Luca1, Laura Stefani, Gianni Pedrizzetti, Stefano Pedri, Giorgio Galanti.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Regular training, in particular endurance exercise, induces structural myocardial adaptation, so-called "athlete's heart". In addition to the 2D standard echo parameters, assessment of myocardial function is currently possible by deformation parameters (strain, rotation and twist). Aim of study is to assess the role of rotation and twist parameters for better characterize the heart performance in trained elite young athletes from different kind of sports. Eventually, verify early on any possible impact due to the regular sport activity not revealed by the standard parameters.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21992622 PMCID: PMC3222600 DOI: 10.1186/1476-7120-9-27
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Ultrasound ISSN: 1476-7120 Impact factor: 2.062
Figure 1Example of endocardial circumferential strain at basal level of LV assessed by X-Strain software (ESAOTE, Italy).
Figure 2Example of endocadial basal rotation of LV assessed by X-Strain Software (ESAOTE, Italy).
Standard 2D-echocardiography data of the three groups of athletes
| Cycling | Soccer | Basket | Controls | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17.6 ± 0.5 | 16.5 ± 2.5 | 17.0 ± 2.5 | 22.8 ± 3.2∞ | |
| 76.4 ± 11.5 | 71.05 ± 13.4¶ | 81.82 ± 12.4 | 73.2 ± 8.9 | |
| 9.47 ± 0.9 | 9.38 ± 1.0 | 9.16 ± 0.9 | 8.92 ± 0.9 | |
| 9.49 ± 0.8 | 9.25 ± 0.7 | 8.93 ± 0.9 | 8.76 ± 1.0# | |
| 51.7 ± 2.6 | 50.2 ± 4.0 | 50.5 ± 3.6 | 47 ± 3.1♥ Δ ¶ | |
| 33.6 ± 1.7 | 31.9 ± 3.1 | 32.0 ± 3.3 | 30.2 ± 2.2♦ | |
| 114.5 ± 18.5¶ | 105.9 ± 16.9 | 100.7 ± 14.3 | 87.4 ± 9.8£ * $ | |
| 0.36 ± 0.05 | 0.37 ± 0.06 | 0.35 ± 0.05 | 0.38 ± 0.07 | |
| 63.8 ± 2.5 | 65.6 ± 4.6 | 65.6 ± 5.1 | 61.4 ± 1.3Ω Φ | |
| 79.2 ± 14.5 | 97.1 ± 11.7£ | 95.9 ± 15.3♥ | 86.4 ± 13.2 | |
| 42.9 ± 6.7§ | 49.0 ± 17.5 | 53.0 ± 11.4♦ | 58.4 ± 12.5 | |
| 158.8 ± 12.4 | 157.5 ± 18.9 | 175.1 ± 24.1 | 160.4 ± 54 | |
| 70.7 ± 8.7 | 70.2 ± 7.1 | 66.3 ± 8.7 | 84 ± 26.4∞ |
Legend: IVS: interventricular septum, PW: posterior wall, LVDD: left ventricle diastolic diameter, LVSD: left ventricle systolic diameter, EF: ejection fraction, CMi: cardiac mass index, WRT: wall ratio thickness, DT: deceleration time, IVRT: isovolumic relaxation time.
Significant differences: *p = .004 vs. soccer, §p = .001 vs. controls, ♦p = .03 vs. cycling, ∞p < .001 vs. other groups, ♥p = .001 vs. cycling, Δp = .02 vs. soccer; ¶p = .01 vs. basket; £p < .001 vs. cycling, $p = .04 vs. basket; Ωp = .01 vs. soccer;Φp < .01 vs. basket; ¥p = .006 vs. basket, ‡p = .007 vs. controls; #p = .05 vs. controls.
Peak systolic strains, rotation and twist of subendocardial and subepicardial layers among the three groups of athletes
| Cycling | Soccer | Basket | Controls | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| -23.02 ± 4.6 | -23.40 ± 2.6 | -21.82 ± 3.5 | -23.63 ± 3.5 | |
| -37.64 ± 8.5¥ | -33.82 ± 8.0 | -32.15 ± 9.3 | -29.49 ± 7.4 | |
| -16.72 ± 3.2 | -17.84 ± 2.8 | -17.96 ± 2.9 | -18.08 ± 2.3 | |
| -7.32 ± 2.1£ | -6.29 ± 2.4 | -6.19 ± 1.5 | -5.69 ± 1.0 | |
| 8.86 ± 3.2 | 7.65 ± 2.1 | 7.29 ± 2.0 | 7.79 ± 1.8 | |
| 16.18 ± 4.1 | 13.94 ± 2.7 | 13.48 ± 3.4 | 12.89 ± 2.4 | |
| -13.50 ± 3.3 | -14.53 ± 2.5 | -13.87 ± 2.6 | -13.28 ± 1.6 | |
| -15.55 ± 4.7 | -12.75 ± 3.9 | -11.06 ± 3.2Δ | -14.56 ± 6.5 | |
| -11.70 ± 2.0¶ | -13.43 ± 2.4 | -13.72 ± 2.9 | -14.73 ± 3.3 | |
| -4.34 ± 1.2 | -3.52 ± 1.1∞ | -3.71 ± 1.2? | -2.53 ± 0.7 | |
| 5.00 ± 1.7♦ | 4.26 ± 1.3 | 3.81 ± 1.5Δ | 5.10 ± 2.3 | |
| 9.51 ± 2.4 | 7.78 ± 1.7 | 7.52 ± 1.5 | 7.63 ± 2.1 | |
| 6.67 ± 3.8 | 6.17 ± 2.2 | 5.96 ± 2.4 | 5.48 ± 1.47 |
Legend:. *p = .04 vs. soccer; †p = .03 vs. basket; ♦p = .04 vs. basket; ‡p = .006 vs. basket; #p = .01 vs. soccer; Φp = .02 vs. basket, §p = .005 vs. basket, £p = .04 vs. controls, ¥p = .02 vs. controls, ?p = .01 vs. controls, ∞p = .03 vs. controls, ♥p < .001 vs. controls, Δp = .05 vs. controls, ¶p = .005 vs. controls. Circum-ε: circumferential strain; Longit-ε: longitudinal strain.
Figure 3LV rotation and twist histogram for epicardial and endocardial layers.
Segmental LV longitudinal peak systolic strain in all considered groups
| Basal | Medium | Apical | Bas-Ap P | Bas-Med P | Med-Ap P | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -14.96 ± 5.0 | -15.40 ± 3.9 | -19.83 ± 6.4 | |||||
| -16.00 ± 5.5 | -14.81 ± 4.8 | -19.35 ± 5.6 | |||||
| -14.71 ± 4.6 | -17.43 ± 2.9 | -20.78 ± 5.4 | |||||
| -16.94 ± 4.5 | -18.55 ± 3.4 | -18.66 ± 6.4 | |||||
| -15.44 ± 4.2 | -16.30 ± 3.0 | -20.59 ± 6.8 | |||||
| -17.97 ± 4.8 | -18.74 ± 3.8 | -18.74 ± 6.7 | |||||
| -23.72 ± 3.7 | -29.44 ± 3.5 | -15.88 ± 4.0 | |||||
| -17.10 ± 10.6 | -23.0 ± 6.9 | -16.91 ± 8.6 | |||||
| -11.33 ± 3.4 | -12.54 ± 3.4 | 11.69 ± 6.0 | |||||
| -11.67 ± 5.6 | -12.08 ± 4.2 | -10.88 ± 4.8 | |||||
| -13.22 | -15.44 ± 3.0 | -13.05 ± 4.6 | |||||
| -13.27 ± 4.9 | -14.66 ± 3.5 | -10.96 ± 4.1 | |||||
| -15.92 ± 4.3 | -15.45 ± 2.8 | -11.95 ± 3.8 | |||||
| -14.93 ± 7.0 | -12.77 ± 7.9 | -11.32 ± 3.6 | |||||
| -12.24 ± 5.0 | -15.80 ± 2.8 | -15.48 ± 3.7 | |||||
| -14.74 ± 8.4 | -16.50 ± 8.4 | - 10.93 ± 5.9 | N.S. | N.S. | N.S. | ||
Figure 4Correlation CMi/twist in cyclists.