| Literature DB >> 21992515 |
Iftikhar Alam1, Anis Larbi, Graham Pawelec, Parvez I Paracha.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The elderly population is increasing worldwide, which warrants their nutritional status assessment more important. The present study was undertaken to establish the nutritional status of the least-studied elderly population in Pakistan.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21992515 PMCID: PMC3207878 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-10-111
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr J ISSN: 1475-2891 Impact factor: 3.271
General and anthropometric characteristics of the study subjects
| Mean age (yrs) | 68.9 (8.80); Range: 50 - 98 yr |
|---|---|
| Education (% number of subjects ) | |
| | 24 |
| | 8 |
| | 17 |
| | |
| % number of economically active2 | 41 |
| % number living with families | 82 |
| % number whose wives had died | 48 |
| % number in four BMI groups 3 | |
| | 13.1% |
| | 3.1% |
| | 73.0% |
| | 10.8% |
| Mean (SD) % BF in four BMI groups | |
| | 38.4 (7.21) |
| | 32.2 (5.18) |
| | 25.6 (5.52) |
| | 15.1 ( 6.41) |
1Non-conventional refers to the particular education system imparted in local Madrassas (the religious education system in Pakistan).2Economically active refers here to an engagement in a job or service for earning purpose.3BMI categories as per WHO (2003)
Percent of overweight (OW) and obesity (OB) by body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC) and waist-hip ratio (WHR) cut-offs
| Age (yrs) | N | BMI | WC | WHR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50-60 | 59 | 0.7 | 0 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 4.7 | 1.1 |
| 60.1-70 | 260 | 6.2 | 2.4 | 3.8 | 1.1 | 23.2 | 6 |
| 70.1-80 | 154 | 3.1 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 9.3 | 1.5 |
| 80.1-90 | 65 | 0.4 | 0 | 0.7 | 0 | 4.7 | 0.7 |
| >90 | 7 | 0.2 | 0 | 0.4 | 0 | 1.6 | 0.2 |
| Overall | 526 | 10.6 | 3.3 | 7.7 | 1.7 | 43.5 | 9.5 |
BMI = Body Mass Index; WC = Waist Circumference; WHR = Waist to hip ratio; OW = Overweight; OB = Obese
Mean (SD) of nutrient intake in four BMI categories
| Nutrients | Obese (OB) | Over-weight (OW) | Normal weight (NW) | Under-weight (UW) | p-value1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Energy (Kcal) | 2266 (312.2) | 2058 (219.5) | 1651 (311) | 817 (312) | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Protein (g) | 41.8 (6.68) | 42.3 (6.79) | 43.4 (6.41) | 27.0 (7.06) | 0.002 | 0.0421 | <0.0001 |
| Fiber (g) | 6.8 (1.62) | 7.6 (2.06) | 9.4 (1.60) | 3.5 (1.14) | 0.0481 | 0.0041 | <0.0001 |
| Calcium (mg) | 342.4 (79.1) | 392.2 (91.6) | 451.4 (111.1) | 270 (83.1) | <0.0001 | 0.0052 | <0.0001 |
| Iron (mg) | 11.2 (2.48) | 12.7 (3.5) | 13.1 (2.81) | 7.2 (2.90) | 0.0139 | 0.0139 | <0.0001 |
| Zinc (mg) | 7.3 (1.31) | 7.2 (1.7) | 7.5 (1.58) | 4.4 (1.18) | 0.1421 | 0.0411 | <0.0001 |
| Vit A (RE) | 283.6 (97.2) | 298.3 (113.1) | 314.9 (194) | 219 (106.5) | 0.0439 | 0.0501 | 0.0006 |
| Vit C (mg) | 32.3 (17.3) | 25.9 (13.7) | 44.4 (12.3) | 14.2 (8.16) | 0.0431 | 0.0411 | <0.0001 |
1. p-values were calculated using Dennett's test in JMP. The normal weight castigatory was considered as reference. Alpha value for significance was 0.05
Figure 1Percent (%) Number of elderly in four BMI categories with adequate intake of nutrients. The adequate intake is defined as intake 67.3 - 100% of the recommended intake
Figure 2Correlation Matrix. The correlation analysis was performed for age, anthropometric measurements (BMI, WC, WHR,), %BF, energy and protein. The alpha level of significance is 0.05.