Literature DB >> 21990601

Relative cost comparison of embolic materials used for treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms.

Scott D Simon1, Adam S Reig, Robert F James, Prasad Reddy, Robert A Mericle.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Embolization of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms can be associated with excessive expense, especially for large/giant aneurysms. Depending on the material used, endovascular treatment may be cost prohibitive. The goal of this study was to evaluate the relative cost of various embolic agents.
METHODS: Utilizing software available at http://www.angiocalc.com, theoretical aneurysm volumes were calculated using aneurysm diameters ranging from 3 to 25 mm increasing in 1 mm increments. For each volume, the software calculated the length of coil needed to fill each size of aneurysm to a consistent, standardized and desirable packing density (25% coil:aneurysm volume). Each theoretical aneurysm was embolized by filling volume in a consistent, standardized, step-wise fashion. The cost of liquid embolics was calculated by adding the cost of 1.5 ml vials of Onyx HD 500 required to fill each volume. The embolic agents were then grouped into seven categories depending on the coil type and the cost of each aneurysm size was averaged.
RESULTS: The average embolization with small outer diameter (0.010 inches) helical coils ranged between $714 for a 3 mm aneurysm to $113,009 for a 25 mm aneurysm, and between $2855 and $157,245 for small diameter spherical coils. Large outer diameter (>0.010 inches) helical coils cost between $2195 and $34,034 and large diameter spherical coils cost between $2195 and $86,957. Bioactive coils ranged between $1984 and $172,179, liquid embolic $5950 and $35,700, and hydrocoils $1295 and $32,873.
CONCLUSIONS: Larger outer diameter helical coils, hydrocoils and liquid embolics provide a relative cost savings compared with standard, spherical or bioactive coils when aneurysm size, shape, packing density and embolic agent were controlled and standardized. This cost differential increases as the size of the aneurysm increases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21990601     DOI: 10.1136/jnis.2009.001719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg        ISSN: 1759-8478            Impact factor:   5.836


  5 in total

Review 1.  Embolic Agents: Coils.

Authors:  Nicholas Xiao; Robert J Lewandowski
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  Assessing the aneurysm occlusion efficacy of a shear-thinning biomaterial in a 3D-printed model.

Authors:  Grant Schroeder; Masoud Edalati; Gregory Tom; Nicole Kuntjoro; Mark Gutin; Melvin Gurian; Edoardo Cuniberto; Elisabeth Hirth; Alessia Martiri; Maria Teresa Sposato; Selda Aminzadeh; James Eichenbaum; Parvin Alizadeh; Avijit Baidya; Reihaneh Haghniaz; Rohollah Nasiri; Naoki Kaneko; Abraham Mansouri; Ali Khademhosseini; Amir Sheikhi
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2022-03-18

3.  A Cross-Sectional Survey of Interventional Radiologists and Vascular Surgeons Regarding the Cost and Reimbursement of Common Devices and Procedures.

Authors:  Angela Wang; Stephanie L Dybul; Parag J Patel; Sean M Tutton; Cheong J Lee; Sarah B White
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 3.464

4.  Balloon-assisted coil embolization (BACE) of a wide-necked renal artery aneurysm using the intracranial scepter C compliant occlusion balloon catheter.

Authors:  Jeeban Paul Das; Hamed Asadi; Hong Kuan Kok; Emma Phelan; Alan O'Hare; Michael J Lee
Journal:  CVIR Endovasc       Date:  2018-10-03

5.  Nanocomposite Hydrogel with Tantalum Microparticles for Rapid Endovascular Hemostasis.

Authors:  Hassan Albadawi; Izzet Altun; Jingjie Hu; Zefu Zhang; Anshuman Panda; Han-Jun Kim; Ali Khademhosseini; Rahmi Oklu
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 16.806

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.